What to do with Ladish

2010-08-20 Thread rosea grammostola
Hi,

Some time back there was a little discussion about packaging Ladish or
not (www.ladish.org). Ladish is a Linux audio session manager, which
stores projects, launched apps, jack connections etc.

At this time pretty some apps have Ladish support or will have it in the
next release, for example:

Rosegarden
Qtractor
Yoshimi
Hydrogen
Jack-mixer
Bristol
Ams

Even if Ladish will not be in Debian, it would be good imo to have those
apps with Ladish support enabled (dunno if that's possible), so people
who want to use Ladish don't have to re-package all those apps themselves.

Regards,

\r

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: What to do with Ladish

2010-08-20 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:47:19PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:

  Some time back there was a little discussion about packaging Ladish or
  not (www.ladish.org). Ladish is a Linux audio session manager, which
  stores projects, launched apps, jack connections etc.
 
 Why isn't it in debian yet?

By that time, it was ladish-0.1. We now have ladish-0.2, and apps need
to support it, read, implement special handlers for the ladish
callbacks/signals.

The newly created JACK session API aims more or less at the same, and
apps need to implement it. While there is already support for JACK
session in jackd1's SVN, there is none in jackd2. Nowhere.

OTOH, ladish requires a DBUS-enabled jackd, and this means jackd2 at the
moment.

Long story short: This is a moving target, pure development area. The
gladish screenshots look nice, but as long as there's no consensus about
session save API upstream, we trick users into lots of problems: apps
not supporting it, jackds not supporting it and so on.


Rosea: do you use gladish? I never tried it, I only saw some discussion
about it on IRC and the mailing lists. I might be mistaken, so if you
say it's a must have piece of software, then we clearly should get our
hands dirty and start packaging it. ;)


 I don't remember the details.

1e. ;) SCNR


-- 
mail: a...@thur.de  http://adi.thur.de  PGP/GPG: key via keyserver

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: What to do with Ladish

2010-08-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 01:46:18PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:47:19PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:

 Some time back there was a little discussion about packaging Ladish 
 or not (www.ladish.org). Ladish is a Linux audio session manager, 
 which stores projects, launched apps, jack connections etc.


Why isn't it in debian yet?


By that time, it was ladish-0.1. We now have ladish-0.2, and apps need 
to support it, read, implement special handlers for the ladish 
callbacks/signals.


The newly created JACK session API aims more or less at the same, and 
apps need to implement it. While there is already support for JACK 
session in jackd1's SVN, there is none in jackd2. Nowhere.


OTOH, ladish requires a DBUS-enabled jackd, and this means jackd2 at 
the moment.


Long story short: This is a moving target, pure development area. The 
gladish screenshots look nice, but as long as there's no consensus 
about session save API upstream, we trick users into lots of problems: 
apps not supporting it, jackds not supporting it and so on.


Sounds to me like it then makes sense to do the following for Debian:

 1) Package ladish but release it only for experimental
 2) For packages supporting ladish, enable it if available at build time
 3) Build ladish-supporting packages for experimental

That way those interested in maturing ladish have a way to test 
progress.



Rosea: do you use gladish? I never tried it, I only saw some discussion 
about it on IRC and the mailing lists. I might be mistaken, so if you 
say it's a must have piece of software, then we clearly should get our 
hands dirty and start packaging it. ;)




I don't remember the details.


1e. ;) SCNR


Huh?


 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: What to do with Ladish

2010-08-20 Thread Alessio Treglia
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
  1) Package ladish but release it only for experimental

ACK

  2) For packages supporting ladish, enable it if available at build time

ACK

  3) Build ladish-supporting packages for experimental

ACK


-- 
Alessio Treglia ales...@alessiotreglia.com
Debian  Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers