Re: flumotion (ITA)
On 12-03-07 at 12:41pm, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2012-03-07 10:54, Loïc Minier wrote: >> if you find the CDBS documentation, please tell me so i can check >> myself... > the only documentation i know of lives in denmark and expressed > willingness to "have a look" :-) Ouch! :-D I apologize that my girlfriend came home early last night, so I did not get the quality time alone with my laptop as expected :-P I'll hopefully make up for it tonight! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: flumotion (ITA)
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > now update-rc.d doesn't restart anything. Oh right, it's just update-rc.d that you changed; nevermind > if you find the CDBS documentation, please tell me so i can check > myself... the only documentation i know of lives in denmark and > expressed willingness to "have a look" :-) haha -- yeah, CDBS doc is best accessed with `rgrep /usr/share/cdbs` :-) -- Loïc Minier ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: flumotion (ITA)
Am 07.03.2012 12:41, schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig: if you find the CDBS documentation, please tell me so i can check myself... the only documentation i know of lives in denmark and expressed willingness to "have a look" :-) Not perfectly up-to-date, but a beginning: http://cdbs-doc.duckcorp.org/ Also, there is a doc/ directory in the cdbs sources in which you can run "make". ;) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: flumotion (ITA)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 salut! On 2012-03-07 10:54, Loïc Minier wrote: > I've had a look at the changes; thanks for moving to latest packaging thanks for reviewing! > standards (3.0 (quilt), git-bp, pycompat and such) and thanks for > adding the history of uploads by importing the .dsc files. > > I checked your new changes, and most seem good, concerning: > 4fe1e976fd8b49ff2511f7170a13d5ff6de6d2ac > update-rc.d is automagically called by dh_installinit > > IIRC, the byte-compilation was happening by some stanza inserted in > #DEBHELPER# back then, and it was good to restart flumotion after the > byte-compilation had taken place. Otherwise, dh_installinit might > insert the restart snippet before or after byte-compilation, but not > consistenly restart flumotion after byte-compilation. Nowadays, I'm > not sure how to ensure that the daemon is started with the .py files > already byte-compiled. afaics, there is no problem. the original code was something like: DH_MAGIC call update-rc.d restart the init.d script this got me lintian _errors_ due to duplicate calls of update-rc.d. close inspection of final postinst script revealed, that DH_MAGIC adds an update-rc.d stanza and starts byte-compilation, so we get: call update-rc.d do byte-compilation call update-rc.d restart the init.d script now update-rc.d doesn't restart anything. it only makes sure that the init.d script is called at various runlevels (or however this is called nowadays) therefore, removing the 2nd call to update-rc.d is not harmful, esp. since the code that restarts flumotion after byte-compilation is still there. > The other packaging changes also relate to packaging style, and made > sense in my reading, but I didn't check every single change against the > CDBS documentation or such. if you find the CDBS documentation, please tell me so i can check myself... the only documentation i know of lives in denmark and expressed willingness to "have a look" :-) fgasmdr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9XSUsACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvRo0wCeMLaeO9J/BvnVH3Yq/1/HOzzA I3wAoJVaCwvnqQf8lLSn/tsNZLlm2tzy =LZRZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: flumotion (ITA)
Hey, On Tue, Mar 06, 2012, forum::für::umläute wrote: > the "flumotion" package has been in a bad state for some years now. > i talked with it's current maintainer (CC: Loïc Minier) at IRC and he > said he would not spend much more time on this package, and would be ok, > if i adapted the package. yeah; thanks a lot for stepping up to take it! > git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/flumotion I've had a look at the changes; thanks for moving to latest packaging standards (3.0 (quilt), git-bp, pycompat and such) and thanks for adding the history of uploads by importing the .dsc files. I checked your new changes, and most seem good, concerning: 4fe1e976fd8b49ff2511f7170a13d5ff6de6d2ac update-rc.d is automagically called by dh_installinit IIRC, the byte-compilation was happening by some stanza inserted in #DEBHELPER# back then, and it was good to restart flumotion after the byte-compilation had taken place. Otherwise, dh_installinit might insert the restart snippet before or after byte-compilation, but not consistenly restart flumotion after byte-compilation. Nowadays, I'm not sure how to ensure that the daemon is started with the .py files already byte-compiled. The other packaging changes also relate to packaging style, and made sense in my reading, but I didn't check every single change against the CDBS documentation or such. > PS: the package has not gone through a regular orphanage/ITA cycle. is > this necessary? Nope; I wont complain :-) Thanks! -- Loïc Minier ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: flumotion (ITA)
On 12-03-06 at 12:50pm, forum::für::umläute wrote:
> the "flumotion" package has been in a bad state for some years now. i
> talked with it's current maintainer (CC: Loïc Minier) at IRC and he
> said he would not spend much more time on this package, and would be
> ok, if i adapted the package.
>
> given the nature of fluotion ("Fluendo Streaming Server - manager,
> worker and admin"), i'd rather do this under the hood of
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers.
> i hope this is ok with all of you (if not, i can move the package-git
> to collab-maint)
Great! I'd be happy to help maintain it.
> so far i have imported the packaging history into a new git, and
> imported the latest upstream release.
> i upgraded - to the best of my knowledge - the cdbs buildsystem,
> converted the copyright to DEP-5 and whatnot (for details see
> debian/changelog)
>
> it's all pushed to:
> git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/flumotion
>
> if somebody would like to have a look and/or upload, i'd be greatful.
I'll have a look at it later today...!
> PS: the package has not gone through a regular orphanage/ITA cycle. is
> this necessary?
No need. The important part is that the former maintainer is ok with
the handover.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
flumotion (ITA)
hi all,
the "flumotion" package has been in a bad state for some years now.
i talked with it's current maintainer (CC: Loïc Minier) at IRC and he
said he would not spend much more time on this package, and would be ok,
if i adapted the package.
given the nature of fluotion ("Fluendo Streaming Server - manager,
worker and admin"), i'd rather do this under the hood of
pkg-multimedia-maintainers.
i hope this is ok with all of you (if not, i can move the package-git to
collab-maint)
so far i have imported the packaging history into a new git, and
imported the latest upstream release.
i upgraded - to the best of my knowledge - the cdbs buildsystem,
converted the copyright to DEP-5 and whatnot (for details see
debian/changelog)
it's all pushed to:
git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/flumotion
if somebody would like to have a look and/or upload, i'd be greatful.
mfgar
IOhannes
PS: the package has not gone through a regular orphanage/ITA cycle. is
this necessary?
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
