Re: libde265_0.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-08-11 Thread Joachim Bauch
Hi Thorsten, On 30.07.2014 14:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: unfortunately I have to reject your package. According to the file headers (dec265/* and libde265/* both say they are part of libde265) you mix GPLv3- and LGPLv3-code and say that the result is LGPLv3 (in Readme.md). This is not

Re: libde265_0.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-08-11 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Joachim, On Mon, 11 Aug 2014, Joachim Bauch wrote: all your concerns have been addressed as discussed in the upload of libde265 0.8-1 which is now pending in the NEW queue: great, thanks alot and marked for accept. Thorsten ___

Re: libde265_0.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-08-08 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Joachim, On Thu, 7 Aug 2014, Joachim Bauch wrote: just a quick follow-up on my last mail. As this is my first package I'm not sure if there is anything else I should do, or if I should just wait until someone finds some time to upload it. you need to prod your sponsor more often. Otherwise

Re: libde265_0.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-08-08 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Joachim On 2014-08-07 09:49:27, Joachim Bauch wrote: Dear team, On 31.07.2014 12:02, Joachim Bauch wrote: [...] I understand. We created a new release that contains all your feedback. @Alessio: could you (or any other uploader) please review my changes and create/upload a new

Re: libde265_0.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-08-08 Thread Joachim Bauch
Hi Sebastian, thanks for the detailed feedback. On 08.08.2014 16:29, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: If Alessio (or someone else) doesn't beat me, here are some points that I'd like to see fixed before I'd upload it: [...] All reported issues have been changed in the repository on alioth. *

Re: libde265_0.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-08-08 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2014-08-08 17:11:27, Joachim Bauch wrote: All reported issues have been changed in the repository on alioth. Great :) Please let me know if there is anything you want to have changed, or are happy to upload it now ;-) Please update the date in the changelog trailer to match today's date

Re: libde265_0.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-08-08 Thread Joachim Bauch
On 08.08.2014 17:21, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: [...] Please update the date in the changelog trailer to match today's date (run dch -r again) and then I'll build and upload. Done. Best regards, Joachim ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Re: libde265_0.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-08-08 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2014-08-08 17:24:37, Joachim Bauch wrote: On 08.08.2014 17:21, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: [...] Please update the date in the changelog trailer to match today's date (run dch -r again) and then I'll build and upload. Done. Uploaded. -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description:

Re: libde265_0.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-08-08 Thread Joachim Bauch
On 08.08.2014 17:35, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: Uploaded. Great, thanks! ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: libde265_0.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-08-07 Thread Joachim Bauch
Dear team, On 31.07.2014 12:02, Joachim Bauch wrote: [...] I understand. We created a new release that contains all your feedback. @Alessio: could you (or any other uploader) please review my changes and create/upload a new package of libde265? I updated the git repository on alioth with

Re: libde265_0.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-08-04 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am Donnerstag, den 31.07.2014, 12:02 +0200 schrieb Joachim Bauch: - Fixed debian/watch to download release tarball, not source tarball. I don' understand this change. If the release tarball does not contain the sources, this is most probably wrong. - Fabian

Re: libde265_0.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-08-04 Thread Joachim Bauch
Hi Fabian, On 04.08.2014 09:18, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 31.07.2014, 12:02 +0200 schrieb Joachim Bauch: - Fixed debian/watch to download release tarball, not source tarball. I don' understand this change. If the release tarball does not contain the sources, this is most

Re: libde265_0.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-07-31 Thread Joachim Bauch
Hi Thorsten, thanks for the detailed feedback, please see my comments below. On 30.07.2014 16:05, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: ok, so I would suggest to change the header of those application files from This file is part of libde265. to something like This file is part of a sample application to

libde265_0.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-07-30 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. According to the file headers (dec265/* and libde265/* both say they are part of libde265) you mix GPLv3- and LGPLv3-code and say that the result is LGPLv3 (in Readme.md). This is not possible as the result must be GPLv3. Can you

Re: libde265_0.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-07-30 Thread Joachim Bauch
Hi Thorsten, thanks for the feedback to the package. Please find my comments about LGPLv3 / GPLv3 below. On 30.07.2014 14:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: unfortunately I have to reject your package. According to the file headers (dec265/* and libde265/* both say they are part of libde265) you

Re: libde265_0.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-07-30 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Joachim, On Wed, 30 Jul 2014, Joachim Bauch wrote: The decoder library libde265 which is LGPLv3 is compiled only from the sources in folder libde265 (and subfolders). The folders dec265 (and sherlock265) contain example applications that use the decoder (through dynamic linking of the