Re: requesting sponsor for pd-cyclone
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 16:26 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 14:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:50 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:33, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Nov 13, 2010, at 8:37 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:17, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:19 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:15:05AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: pd-cyclone is a huge library of all sorts of objects that are clones of objects in Max/MSP4.5, Pd's proprietary cousin. It also includes utilities for importing Max files. pd-cyclone is a long-form dh package that is a wrapper to a very complicated Make build system. pd-cxc is in git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages. It builds on my i386, but it did not build on the launchpad amd64 build machine, it died on this error, which has stumped me: dpkg-genchanges -B -mUbuntu/amd64 Build Daemon bui...@titanium.ppa ../pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1~maverick_amd64.changes dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent packages dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory It looks odd to me that you use no debhelper tools in the binary-arch target - only in the binary-indep one. Thanks, that was the key. This now builds on i386 and amd64 and is ready to go. The git repository is not fixed. I am not sure I understand. What I see on git.debian.org is the same as what I have on my machine, and I used git-buildpackage to make the source package to submit to Launchpad: http://launchpad.net/~eighthave/+archive/libdirs/+sourcepub/1362005/+listing-archive-extra Oh it was fixed, my bad. But there is a large commit that changes many things at once (d634143), and the change was hidden there. Also, why do you use long-form debhelper? Because I didn't see a way to do it with short-form. This library has a very elaborate build system that I've tried for years to figure out. Instead I've found the best way is to wrap it into something more understandable, and long-form seemed the easiest way to do that. Indeed, the makefile is quite convoluted. It also can't handle it when the user passes CFLAGS and other variables. Also, it sets -j4 unconditionally. On further inspection, the package seems to bundle the pddp source. Are riddle, sickle and ViCious more code copies? We should not use code copies. We need to avoid using them. This is how cyclone is released. The code in 'pddp', 'riddle', and 'ViCious' are unused. The 'pddp' code shared some code with pd-pddp, but not all. The code in 'sickle' is fully part of pd-cyclone and used. OK. Are you willing to look into a switch to cdbs (using long-form debhelper does not make much sense, and I personally prefer cdbs over dh)? I have pushed a cdbs branch to the git repository for you to look at. If you are willing to give cdbs a try, we can merge into the master branch and I can continue the review and upload. I just checked out it, it looks more straightforward to use cdbs for pd-cyclone, so I say go for it! One thing I noticed is that there isn't a Build-Depend on cdbs. .hc ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsor for pd-cyclone
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 20:19, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 16:26 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 14:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:50 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:33, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Nov 13, 2010, at 8:37 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:17, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:19 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:15:05AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: pd-cyclone is a huge library of all sorts of objects that are clones of objects in Max/MSP4.5, Pd's proprietary cousin. It also includes utilities for importing Max files. pd-cyclone is a long-form dh package that is a wrapper to a very complicated Make build system. pd-cxc is in git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages. It builds on my i386, but it did not build on the launchpad amd64 build machine, it died on this error, which has stumped me: dpkg-genchanges -B -mUbuntu/amd64 Build Daemon bui...@titanium.ppa ../pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1~maverick_amd64.changes dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent packages dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory It looks odd to me that you use no debhelper tools in the binary-arch target - only in the binary-indep one. Thanks, that was the key. This now builds on i386 and amd64 and is ready to go. The git repository is not fixed. I am not sure I understand. What I see on git.debian.org is the same as what I have on my machine, and I used git-buildpackage to make the source package to submit to Launchpad: http://launchpad.net/~eighthave/+archive/libdirs/+sourcepub/1362005/+listing-archive-extra Oh it was fixed, my bad. But there is a large commit that changes many things at once (d634143), and the change was hidden there. Also, why do you use long-form debhelper? Because I didn't see a way to do it with short-form. This library has a very elaborate build system that I've tried for years to figure out. Instead I've found the best way is to wrap it into something more understandable, and long-form seemed the easiest way to do that. Indeed, the makefile is quite convoluted. It also can't handle it when the user passes CFLAGS and other variables. Also, it sets -j4 unconditionally. On further inspection, the package seems to bundle the pddp source. Are riddle, sickle and ViCious more code copies? We should not use code copies. We need to avoid using them. This is how cyclone is released. The code in 'pddp', 'riddle', and 'ViCious' are unused. The 'pddp' code shared some code with pd-pddp, but not all. The code in 'sickle' is fully part of pd-cyclone and used. OK. Are you willing to look into a switch to cdbs (using long-form debhelper does not make much sense, and I personally prefer cdbs over dh)? I have pushed a cdbs branch to the git repository for you to look at. If you are willing to give cdbs a try, we can merge into the master branch and I can continue the review and upload. I just checked out it, it looks more straightforward to use cdbs for pd-cyclone, so I say go for it! One thing I noticed is that there isn't a Build-Depend on cdbs. OK. I'm kind of swamped right now, I think around tuesday I'll be able to get around to this. I'm sorry for the delays in uploading some packages. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsor for pd-cyclone
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 14:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:50 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:33, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Nov 13, 2010, at 8:37 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:17, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:19 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:15:05AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: pd-cyclone is a huge library of all sorts of objects that are clones of objects in Max/MSP4.5, Pd's proprietary cousin. It also includes utilities for importing Max files. pd-cyclone is a long-form dh package that is a wrapper to a very complicated Make build system. pd-cxc is in git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages. It builds on my i386, but it did not build on the launchpad amd64 build machine, it died on this error, which has stumped me: dpkg-genchanges -B -mUbuntu/amd64 Build Daemon bui...@titanium.ppa ../pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1~maverick_amd64.changes dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent packages dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory It looks odd to me that you use no debhelper tools in the binary-arch target - only in the binary-indep one. Thanks, that was the key. This now builds on i386 and amd64 and is ready to go. The git repository is not fixed. I am not sure I understand. What I see on git.debian.org is the same as what I have on my machine, and I used git-buildpackage to make the source package to submit to Launchpad: http://launchpad.net/~eighthave/+archive/libdirs/+sourcepub/1362005/+listing-archive-extra Oh it was fixed, my bad. But there is a large commit that changes many things at once (d634143), and the change was hidden there. Also, why do you use long-form debhelper? Because I didn't see a way to do it with short-form. This library has a very elaborate build system that I've tried for years to figure out. Instead I've found the best way is to wrap it into something more understandable, and long-form seemed the easiest way to do that. Indeed, the makefile is quite convoluted. It also can't handle it when the user passes CFLAGS and other variables. Also, it sets -j4 unconditionally. On further inspection, the package seems to bundle the pddp source. Are riddle, sickle and ViCious more code copies? We should not use code copies. We need to avoid using them. This is how cyclone is released. The code in 'pddp', 'riddle', and 'ViCious' are unused. The 'pddp' code shared some code with pd-pddp, but not all. The code in 'sickle' is fully part of pd-cyclone and used. OK. Are you willing to look into a switch to cdbs (using long-form debhelper does not make much sense, and I personally prefer cdbs over dh)? I have pushed a cdbs branch to the git repository for you to look at. If you are willing to give cdbs a try, we can merge into the master branch and I can continue the review and upload. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsor for pd-cyclone
On Nov 19, 2010, at 5:30 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 14:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:50 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:33, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Nov 13, 2010, at 8:37 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:17, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:19 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:15:05AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: pd-cyclone is a huge library of all sorts of objects that are clones of objects in Max/MSP4.5, Pd's proprietary cousin. It also includes utilities for importing Max files. pd-cyclone is a long-form dh package that is a wrapper to a very complicated Make build system. pd-cxc is in git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages. It builds on my i386, but it did not build on the launchpad amd64 build machine, it died on this error, which has stumped me: dpkg-genchanges -B -mUbuntu/amd64 Build Daemon bui...@titanium.ppa ../pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1~maverick_amd64.changes dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including arch- independent packages dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory It looks odd to me that you use no debhelper tools in the binary-arch target - only in the binary-indep one. Thanks, that was the key. This now builds on i386 and amd64 and is ready to go. The git repository is not fixed. I am not sure I understand. What I see on git.debian.org is the same as what I have on my machine, and I used git-buildpackage to make the source package to submit to Launchpad: http://launchpad.net/~eighthave/+archive/libdirs/+sourcepub/1362005/+listing-archive-extra Oh it was fixed, my bad. But there is a large commit that changes many things at once (d634143), and the change was hidden there. Also, why do you use long-form debhelper? Because I didn't see a way to do it with short-form. This library has a very elaborate build system that I've tried for years to figure out. Instead I've found the best way is to wrap it into something more understandable, and long-form seemed the easiest way to do that. Indeed, the makefile is quite convoluted. It also can't handle it when the user passes CFLAGS and other variables. Also, it sets -j4 unconditionally. On further inspection, the package seems to bundle the pddp source. Are riddle, sickle and ViCious more code copies? We should not use code copies. We need to avoid using them. This is how cyclone is released. The code in 'pddp', 'riddle', and 'ViCious' are unused. The 'pddp' code shared some code with pd-pddp, but not all. The code in 'sickle' is fully part of pd-cyclone and used. .hc I am open to changing it to short-form, but I don't see a clear way to do it I don't really prefer short form, but it is just a matter of using override_dh_foo targets. It looks like it's going to be a busy week. I'll continue checking pd packages (hopefully) late next week. No problem, thanks for uploading all these packages! .hc “We must become the change we want to see. - Mahatma Gandhi ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsor for pd-cyclone
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 14:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:50 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:33, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Nov 13, 2010, at 8:37 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:17, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:19 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:15:05AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: pd-cyclone is a huge library of all sorts of objects that are clones of objects in Max/MSP4.5, Pd's proprietary cousin. It also includes utilities for importing Max files. pd-cyclone is a long-form dh package that is a wrapper to a very complicated Make build system. pd-cxc is in git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages. It builds on my i386, but it did not build on the launchpad amd64 build machine, it died on this error, which has stumped me: dpkg-genchanges -B -mUbuntu/amd64 Build Daemon bui...@titanium.ppa ../pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1~maverick_amd64.changes dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent packages dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory It looks odd to me that you use no debhelper tools in the binary-arch target - only in the binary-indep one. Thanks, that was the key. This now builds on i386 and amd64 and is ready to go. The git repository is not fixed. I am not sure I understand. What I see on git.debian.org is the same as what I have on my machine, and I used git-buildpackage to make the source package to submit to Launchpad: http://launchpad.net/~eighthave/+archive/libdirs/+sourcepub/1362005/+listing-archive-extra Oh it was fixed, my bad. But there is a large commit that changes many things at once (d634143), and the change was hidden there. Also, why do you use long-form debhelper? Because I didn't see a way to do it with short-form. This library has a very elaborate build system that I've tried for years to figure out. Instead I've found the best way is to wrap it into something more understandable, and long-form seemed the easiest way to do that. Indeed, the makefile is quite convoluted. It also can't handle it when the user passes CFLAGS and other variables. Also, it sets -j4 unconditionally. On further inspection, the package seems to bundle the pddp source. Are riddle, sickle and ViCious more code copies? We should not use code copies. We need to avoid using them. This is how cyclone is released. The code in 'pddp', 'riddle', and 'ViCious' are unused. The 'pddp' code shared some code with pd-pddp, but not all. The code in 'sickle' is fully part of pd-cyclone and used. .hc I am open to changing it to short-form, but I don't see a clear way to do it I don't really prefer short form, but it is just a matter of using override_dh_foo targets. It looks like it's going to be a busy week. I'll continue checking pd packages (hopefully) late next week. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsor for pd-cyclone
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:50 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:33, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Nov 13, 2010, at 8:37 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:17, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:19 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:15:05AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: pd-cyclone is a huge library of all sorts of objects that are clones of objects in Max/MSP4.5, Pd's proprietary cousin. It also includes utilities for importing Max files. pd-cyclone is a long-form dh package that is a wrapper to a very complicated Make build system. pd-cxc is in git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages. It builds on my i386, but it did not build on the launchpad amd64 build machine, it died on this error, which has stumped me: dpkg-genchanges -B -mUbuntu/amd64 Build Daemon bui...@titanium.ppa ../pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1~maverick_amd64.changes dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent packages dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory It looks odd to me that you use no debhelper tools in the binary-arch target - only in the binary-indep one. Thanks, that was the key. This now builds on i386 and amd64 and is ready to go. The git repository is not fixed. I am not sure I understand. What I see on git.debian.org is the same as what I have on my machine, and I used git-buildpackage to make the source package to submit to Launchpad: http://launchpad.net/~eighthave/+archive/libdirs/+sourcepub/1362005/+listing-archive-extra Oh it was fixed, my bad. But there is a large commit that changes many things at once (d634143), and the change was hidden there. Also, why do you use long-form debhelper? Because I didn't see a way to do it with short-form. This library has a very elaborate build system that I've tried for years to figure out. Instead I've found the best way is to wrap it into something more understandable, and long-form seemed the easiest way to do that. Indeed, the makefile is quite convoluted. It also can't handle it when the user passes CFLAGS and other variables. Also, it sets -j4 unconditionally. On further inspection, the package seems to bundle the pddp source. Are riddle, sickle and ViCious more code copies? We should not use code copies. We need to avoid using them. This is how cyclone is released. The code in 'pddp', 'riddle', and 'ViCious' are unused. The 'pddp' code shared some code with pd-pddp, but not all. The code in 'sickle' is fully part of pd-cyclone and used. .hc I am open to changing it to short-form, but I don't see a clear way to do it I don't really prefer short form, but it is just a matter of using override_dh_foo targets. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsor for pd-cyclone
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:33, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Nov 13, 2010, at 8:37 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:17, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:19 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:15:05AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: pd-cyclone is a huge library of all sorts of objects that are clones of objects in Max/MSP4.5, Pd's proprietary cousin. It also includes utilities for importing Max files. pd-cyclone is a long-form dh package that is a wrapper to a very complicated Make build system. pd-cxc is in git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages. It builds on my i386, but it did not build on the launchpad amd64 build machine, it died on this error, which has stumped me: dpkg-genchanges -B -mUbuntu/amd64 Build Daemon bui...@titanium.ppa ../pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1~maverick_amd64.changes dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent packages dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory It looks odd to me that you use no debhelper tools in the binary-arch target - only in the binary-indep one. Thanks, that was the key. This now builds on i386 and amd64 and is ready to go. The git repository is not fixed. I am not sure I understand. What I see on git.debian.org is the same as what I have on my machine, and I used git-buildpackage to make the source package to submit to Launchpad: http://launchpad.net/~eighthave/+archive/libdirs/+sourcepub/1362005/+listing-archive-extra Oh it was fixed, my bad. But there is a large commit that changes many things at once (d634143), and the change was hidden there. Also, why do you use long-form debhelper? Because I didn't see a way to do it with short-form. This library has a very elaborate build system that I've tried for years to figure out. Instead I've found the best way is to wrap it into something more understandable, and long-form seemed the easiest way to do that. Indeed, the makefile is quite convoluted. It also can't handle it when the user passes CFLAGS and other variables. Also, it sets -j4 unconditionally. On further inspection, the package seems to bundle the pddp source. Are riddle, sickle and ViCious more code copies? We should not use code copies. We need to avoid using them. I am open to changing it to short-form, but I don't see a clear way to do it I don't really prefer short form, but it is just a matter of using override_dh_foo targets. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsor for pd-cyclone
On Nov 13, 2010, at 8:37 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:17, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:19 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:15:05AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: pd-cyclone is a huge library of all sorts of objects that are clones of objects in Max/MSP4.5, Pd's proprietary cousin. It also includes utilities for importing Max files. pd-cyclone is a long-form dh package that is a wrapper to a very complicated Make build system. pd-cxc is in git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages. It builds on my i386, but it did not build on the launchpad amd64 build machine, it died on this error, which has stumped me: dpkg-genchanges -B -mUbuntu/amd64 Build Daemon bui...@titanium.ppa ../pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1~maverick_amd64.changes dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including arch- independent packages dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory It looks odd to me that you use no debhelper tools in the binary- arch target - only in the binary-indep one. Thanks, that was the key. This now builds on i386 and amd64 and is ready to go. The git repository is not fixed. I am not sure I understand. What I see on git.debian.org is the same as what I have on my machine, and I used git-buildpackage to make the source package to submit to Launchpad: http://launchpad.net/~eighthave/+archive/libdirs/+sourcepub/1362005/+listing-archive-extra Also, why do you use long-form debhelper? Because I didn't see a way to do it with short-form. This library has a very elaborate build system that I've tried for years to figure out. Instead I've found the best way is to wrap it into something more understandable, and long-form seemed the easiest way to do that. I am open to changing it to short-form, but I don't see a clear way to do it .hc Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is related to the telescope. -Edsger Dykstra ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsor for pd-cyclone
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:17, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:19 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:15:05AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: pd-cyclone is a huge library of all sorts of objects that are clones of objects in Max/MSP4.5, Pd's proprietary cousin. It also includes utilities for importing Max files. pd-cyclone is a long-form dh package that is a wrapper to a very complicated Make build system. pd-cxc is in git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages. It builds on my i386, but it did not build on the launchpad amd64 build machine, it died on this error, which has stumped me: dpkg-genchanges -B -mUbuntu/amd64 Build Daemon bui...@titanium.ppa ../pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1~maverick_amd64.changes dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent packages dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory It looks odd to me that you use no debhelper tools in the binary-arch target - only in the binary-indep one. Thanks, that was the key. This now builds on i386 and amd64 and is ready to go. The git repository is not fixed. Also, why do you use long-form debhelper? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsor for pd-cyclone
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:15:05AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: pd-cyclone is a huge library of all sorts of objects that are clones of objects in Max/MSP4.5, Pd's proprietary cousin. It also includes utilities for importing Max files. pd-cyclone is a long-form dh package that is a wrapper to a very complicated Make build system. pd-cxc is in git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages. It builds on my i386, but it did not build on the launchpad amd64 build machine, it died on this error, which has stumped me: dpkg-genchanges -B -mUbuntu/amd64 Build Daemon bui...@titanium.ppa ../pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1~maverick_amd64.changes dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent packages dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory It looks odd to me that you use no debhelper tools in the binary-arch target - only in the binary-indep one. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsor for pd-cyclone
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:19 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:15:05AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: pd-cyclone is a huge library of all sorts of objects that are clones of objects in Max/MSP4.5, Pd's proprietary cousin. It also includes utilities for importing Max files. pd-cyclone is a long-form dh package that is a wrapper to a very complicated Make build system. pd-cxc is in git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages. It builds on my i386, but it did not build on the launchpad amd64 build machine, it died on this error, which has stumped me: dpkg-genchanges -B -mUbuntu/amd64 Build Daemon bui...@titanium.ppa ../pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1~maverick_amd64.changes dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent packages dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory It looks odd to me that you use no debhelper tools in the binary-arch target - only in the binary-indep one. Thanks, that was the key. This now builds on i386 and amd64 and is ready to go. .hc ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
requesting sponsor for pd-cyclone
pd-cyclone is a huge library of all sorts of objects that are clones of objects in Max/MSP4.5, Pd's proprietary cousin. It also includes utilities for importing Max files. pd-cyclone is a long-form dh package that is a wrapper to a very complicated Make build system. pd-cxc is in git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages. It builds on my i386, but it did not build on the launchpad amd64 build machine, it died on this error, which has stumped me: dpkg-genchanges -B -mUbuntu/amd64 Build Daemon bui...@titanium.ppa ../pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1~maverick_amd64.changes dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent packages dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory Here's the log: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/58968512/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-amd64.pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1~maverick_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz .hc ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
