Re: separate discussion and development lists

2010-08-20 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:10:45AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 21:21:02 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Is/was DeMuDi a derivative work like debian-multimedia? If so I agree it is easiest to avoid it. If DeMuDi is/was a Debian-internal initiative similar to

Re: separate discussion and development lists

2010-08-20 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:08:20PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 17/08/10 11:58, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 20:15:40 (CEST), Andreas Tille wrote: On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:10:45AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: I've had a small private followup conversation with

Re: separate discussion and development lists

2010-08-20 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:30:11PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:58:43PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: I've had a small private followup conversation with Andreas about this. He basically came up with the suggestion to turn debian-multime...@lists.debian.org from a

Re: separate discussion and development lists

2010-08-17 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 20:15:40 (CEST), Andreas Tille wrote: On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:10:45AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Perhaps? My biggest concern is that with 3 lists, it becomes more and more challenging to decide to which list to post. Replies to -vcs mails currently go to

Re: separate discussion and development lists

2010-08-17 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 17/08/10 11:58, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 20:15:40 (CEST), Andreas Tille wrote: On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:10:45AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Perhaps? My biggest concern is that with 3 lists, it becomes more and more challenging to decide to which list to post.

Re: separate discussion and development lists

2010-08-17 Thread Thomas Maass
Am Dienstag, den 17.08.2010, 12:08 -0400 schrieb Felipe Sateler: On 17/08/10 11:58, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 20:15:40 (CEST), Andreas Tille wrote: On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:10:45AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Perhaps? My biggest concern is that with 3 lists, it

Re: separate discussion and development lists

2010-08-17 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:58:43PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: I've had a small private followup conversation with Andreas about this. He basically came up with the suggestion to turn debian-multime...@lists.debian.org from a *development* oriented mailing list to a *user* focused list.

Re: separate discussion and development lists

2010-08-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:08:20PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: debian-multime...@lists.debian.org from a *development* oriented mailing list to a *user* focused list. This way users can share their thoughts, concerns and kudos. I thought this was the idea the whole time? Yes. Every

Re: separate discussion and development lists

2010-08-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:30:11PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote: Anyway, make this the place for users and keep pkg-multimedia-maintainers for internal discussion. Also note that we should change the maintainer address in the following packages:

Re: separate discussion and development lists

2010-08-17 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:44:17PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: Also note that we should change the maintainer address in the following packages: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-multime...@lists.debian.org If we want to make debian-multimedia a place for users

Re: separate discussion and development lists

2010-08-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:49:58PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote: Not sure if we're talking the same: currently, 17 (16 if you count the fixed gigedit package in experimental) contain debian-multime...@lists.debian.org as the maintainer field. If I correctly understand the proposal, then this

Re: separate discussion and development lists

2010-08-17 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:36:09PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:49:58PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote: Not sure if we're talking the same: currently, 17 (16 if you count the fixed gigedit package in experimental) contain debian-multime...@lists.debian.org as the

Re: separate discussion and development lists

2010-08-14 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 21:21:02 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:06:45PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 13/08/10 13:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 13/08/10 08:01, Andreas Tille wrote: BTW, I have

Re: separate discussion and development lists

2010-08-14 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 14/08/10 04:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 21:21:02 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:06:45PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 13/08/10 13:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 13/08/10

separate discussion and development lists (was: Debian Multimedia Blend)

2010-08-13 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 13/08/10 08:01, Andreas Tille wrote: BTW, I have another issue: This mailing list recieves a lot of packaging related information which I#m not really interested in. However, de just have this mailinglist debian-multime...@l.d.o. Do you see a chance that we move discussion like this about

Re: separate discussion and development lists (was: Debian Multimedia Blend)

2010-08-13 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 13/08/10 08:01, Andreas Tille wrote: BTW, I have another issue: This mailing list recieves a lot of packaging related information which I#m not really interested in. However, de just have this mailinglist

Re: separate discussion and development lists

2010-08-13 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 13/08/10 13:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 13/08/10 08:01, Andreas Tille wrote: BTW, I have another issue: This mailing list recieves a lot of packaging related information which I#m not really interested in. However, de just

Re: separate discussion and development lists

2010-08-13 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:06:45PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 13/08/10 13:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 13/08/10 08:01, Andreas Tille wrote: BTW, I have another issue: This mailing list recieves a lot of packaging related