Re: packaging jack...

2010-04-18 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Puh, here goes another lengthy mail... On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 20:31:46 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 09:25, torbenh torb...@gmx.de wrote: adi said that you somehow seem to believe that there cant be virtual packages containing libraries. this is not true. if you

Re: packaging jack...

2010-04-18 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 22:02:14 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I think others have tried pointing it out to me already, and it begins to get through my thick skull: Even if both ABI and API is compatible across implementations, it is _application_ ABI and API - the daemon use a _different

Processing of aeolus_0.8.4-2_amd64.changes

2010-04-18 Thread Archive Administrator
aeolus_0.8.4-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: aeolus_0.8.4-2.dsc aeolus_0.8.4-2.diff.gz aeolus_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) ___

aeolus_0.8.4-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-04-18 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: aeolus_0.8.4-2.diff.gz to main/a/aeolus/aeolus_0.8.4-2.diff.gz aeolus_0.8.4-2.dsc to main/a/aeolus/aeolus_0.8.4-2.dsc aeolus_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb to main/a/aeolus/aeolus_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: aeolus_0.8.4-2.dsc - source sound

Bug#553630: marked as done ([aeolus] FTBFS with binutils-gold)

2010-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 18 Apr 2010 10:47:09 + with message-id e1o3s1t-0004ty...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#553630: fixed in aeolus 0.8.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #553630, regarding [aeolus] FTBFS with binutils-gold to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processing of lash_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.changes

2010-04-18 Thread Archive Administrator
lash_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lash_0.5.4.0-1.dsc lash_0.5.4.0.orig.tar.gz lash_0.5.4.0-1.debian.tar.gz lash-doc_0.5.4.0-1_all.deb liblash-dev_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.deb lashd_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.deb lash-bin_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.deb

lash_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-04-18 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: lash-bin_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.deb to main/l/lash/lash-bin_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.deb lash-doc_0.5.4.0-1_all.deb to main/l/lash/lash-doc_0.5.4.0-1_all.deb lash_0.5.4.0-1.debian.tar.gz to main/l/lash/lash_0.5.4.0-1.debian.tar.gz lash_0.5.4.0-1.dsc to main/l/lash/lash_0.5.4.0-1.dsc

Re: lash_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-04-18 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Hello Jonas, thank you for your amazing work. best regards mira ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206-18+lenny1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-04-18 Thread Archive Administrator
Warnings: Could not copy ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206.orig.tar.gz to holding; will attempt to find in DB later ignoring ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206.orig.tar.gz, since it's already in the archive. Notes: Mapping stable-security to proposed-updates. Accepted:

Bug#578278: aeolus - FTBFS: error: unrecognized command line option -march=native

2010-04-18 Thread Bastian Blank
Source: aeolus Version: 0.8.4-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.60.0 (23 Feb 2010) on lxdebian.bfinv.de [...] make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-aeolus_0.8.4-2-s390-o0VTgy/aeolus-0.8.4/source' g++ -g -O2 -O3

Possible problems in your Debian packages

2010-04-18 Thread DDPOMail robot
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === bristol: = Missing build(s) on kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 This might need manual action from your side. See

Re: packaging jack...

2010-04-18 Thread David Henningsson
Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: stop right here. the library and the daemon are tied together. the protocol between jackd and libjack is NOT fixed. (basically i consider it a mistake to even have libjack and jackd in different packages) but

RE:hi 9

2010-04-18 Thread Best Value Auto Sales
hi9 Dear friends, I'm sorry, wasted your valuable time, we are chinese a major international trading electronics wholesale company. Our company's electronic products have the best quality, cheapest price and best service. If you have time to buy 5 products that can free you of the

Re: Possible problems in your Debian packages

2010-04-18 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 22:16:28 (CEST), DDPOMail robot wrote: This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === bristol: = Missing build(s) on kfreebsd-amd64