Dear Glen,
Am 21.11.2010 14:23, schrieb i...@bandshed.net:
I'm not sure if libraw1394 falls under your jurisdiction or not but the
No, it does not: http://packages.qa.debian.org/libr/libraw1394.html
latest release (November 1) supports daisy chaining multiple firewire
A bug requesting
Am 20.11.2010 12:37, schrieb Alessio Treglia:
Oh god, I made a mistake.
I get a lot of confusion while trying to re-upload the package, maybe
I've switched to the wrong git branch.
You've messed up the changelog, IMHO it's not that bad and can be
fixed in the next upload. ;)
What's a bit
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 20.11.2010 12:37, schrieb Alessio Treglia:
Oh god, I made a mistake.
I get a lot of confusion while trying to re-upload the package, maybe
I've switched to the wrong git branch.
You've messed up the changelog,
Am 22.11.2010 09:48, schrieb Alessio Treglia:
Yes, it is: I ap
Sorry?
As alternative, we could upload a 2.7-4+squeeze1 release to t-p-u,
what do you think?
Yes, even better. This would save us another upload to unstable to
re-enable the bpa-stdin.patch.
- Fabian
Jonas,
first of all, thanks for helping me out here.
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
If uncertain if some release is sane, then ask _before_ releasing! :-)
Yes, I know, I was sure, the problem is: I was wrong :)
--
Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 22.11.2010 09:48, schrieb Alessio Treglia:
Yes, it is: I ap
Sorry?
I ap...ologize :)
As alternative, we could upload a 2.7-4+squeeze1 release to t-p-u,
what do you think?
Yes, even better. This would save
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:48:52AM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 20.11.2010 12:37, schrieb Alessio Treglia:
Oh god, I made a mistake.
I get a lot of confusion while trying to re-upload the package, maybe
I've
Am 22.11.2010 10:18, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
This is bad: t-p-u does not get the same exposure and automated
testing time before sliding into testing. This means a higher burden
on the Release team for such uploads, and likely less interest in
acceptance due to the weaker testing process!
Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:31:51 +0100
with message-id aanlktinxmdypko1kr=b=wpk9vnwh-kjbuvn11z3sa...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Fixed in sid
has caused the Debian Bug report #603807,
regarding faad segfaults on amd64 due to incorrect pointer size
to be marked as done.
This means
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 2:23 PM, i...@bandshed.net wrote:
Hi
I'm not sure if libraw1394 falls under your jurisdiction or not but the
latest release (November 1) supports daisy chaining multiple firewire
devices on the new firewire stack when used with Kernel 2.6.36. Testing by
AV Linux
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:12:11PM +0100, rosea grammostola wrote:
I've seen some Squeeze exception requests for this that have been flatly
denied (as Squeeze for multimedia slides hopelessly further into
obsolescence)
Sure, still lots to improve, but there are some good developments
Fabian,
Please don't misunderstand, Your (the pkg-multimedia team's) work here is
nothing short of incredible during the past Squeeze development phase, I
as a user/3rd party distributor am certainly aware of that as much as
anyone else, I also know that the freeze is beyond the control of
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:55:10 (CET), Adrian Knoth wrote:
So for the very group of audio producers, Squeeze (and unstable) is
already outdated, that's where i...@bandshed is right. OTOH, this
statement doesn't necessarily holds true for all the other packages we
maintain, e.g., video
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:21:53PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
So for the very group of audio producers, Squeeze (and unstable) is
already outdated
Is experimental up-to-date?
Not in my case, mostly because as a DM I cannot upload to experimental
without prior DD upload. At least I think
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:58:42PM +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:21:53PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
So for the very group of audio producers, Squeeze (and unstable) is
already outdated
Is experimental up-to-date?
Not in my case, mostly because as a DM I cannot
kmidimon_0.7.4-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
kmidimon_0.7.4-1.dsc
kmidimon_0.7.4.orig.tar.bz2
kmidimon_0.7.4-1.debian.tar.gz
kmidimon_0.7.4-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host kassia.debian.org)
kmidimon_0.7.4-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kmidimon_0.7.4-1.dsc
kmidimon_0.7.4.orig.tar.bz2
kmidimon_0.7.4-1.debian.tar.gz
kmidimon_0.7.4-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Accepted:
kmidimon_0.7.4-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/k/kmidimon/kmidimon_0.7.4-1.debian.tar.gz
kmidimon_0.7.4-1.dsc
to main/k/kmidimon/kmidimon_0.7.4-1.dsc
kmidimon_0.7.4-1_i386.deb
to main/k/kmidimon/kmidimon_0.7.4-1_i386.deb
kmidimon_0.7.4.orig.tar.bz2
to
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package sooperlooper
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #596392 (http://bugs.debian.org/596392)
# *
libffado_2.0.99+svn1924-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
libffado_2.0.99+svn1924-1.dsc
libffado_2.0.99+svn1924.orig.tar.bz2
libffado_2.0.99+svn1924-1.debian.tar.gz
ffado-mixer-qt4_2.0.99+svn1924-1_all.deb
libffado_2.0.99+svn1924-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libffado_2.0.99+svn1924-1.dsc
libffado_2.0.99+svn1924.orig.tar.bz2
libffado_2.0.99+svn1924-1.debian.tar.gz
ffado-mixer-qt4_2.0.99+svn1924-1_all.deb
libffado-dev_2.0.99+svn1924-1_i386.deb
Accepted:
ffado-dbus-server_2.0.99+svn1924-1_i386.deb
to main/libf/libffado/ffado-dbus-server_2.0.99+svn1924-1_i386.deb
ffado-mixer-qt4_2.0.99+svn1924-1_all.deb
to main/libf/libffado/ffado-mixer-qt4_2.0.99+svn1924-1_all.deb
ffado-tools_2.0.99+svn1924-1_i386.deb
to
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:39:37PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
So for the very group of audio producers, Squeeze (and unstable) is
already outdated
Is experimental up-to-date?
Not in my case, mostly because as a DM I cannot upload to experimental
without prior DD upload. At least I
On 11/22/2010 06:33 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote:
It's then possible to package Ardour3 for experimental, and I think I
will do once alpha1 will be released.
Alpha software... do you also provide a 'debug' package for it?
\r
___
Od: Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de
We already knew this back in July: multimedia upstream's pace is so much
faster than Debian's release cycle that we need to come up with a better
solution. CUT (constantly usable testing) seemed to be such an option,
though I've never heard about
jackd2_1.9.6~dfsg.1-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
jackd2_1.9.6~dfsg.1-3.dsc
jackd2_1.9.6~dfsg.1-3.debian.tar.gz
jackd2_1.9.6~dfsg.1-3_i386.deb
libjack-jackd2-0_1.9.6~dfsg.1-3_i386.deb
jackd2-firewire_1.9.6~dfsg.1-3_i386.deb
Hi,
I don't pretend to be as 'in the loop' as you guys but speaking to Paul
Davis on Ardour IRC a few weeks ago it seemed Ardour was going to migrate
to a self contained binary model (like Renoise or EnergyXT has). If this
coincides with an alpha A3 release then the dependencies etc will be
Accepted:
jackd2-firewire_1.9.6~dfsg.1-3_i386.deb
to main/j/jackd2/jackd2-firewire_1.9.6~dfsg.1-3_i386.deb
jackd2_1.9.6~dfsg.1-3.debian.tar.gz
to main/j/jackd2/jackd2_1.9.6~dfsg.1-3.debian.tar.gz
jackd2_1.9.6~dfsg.1-3.dsc
to main/j/jackd2/jackd2_1.9.6~dfsg.1-3.dsc
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:00:47AM -0800, i...@bandshed.net wrote:
Hi,
Hi!
I don't pretend to be as 'in the loop' as you guys but speaking to Paul
Davis on Ardour IRC a few weeks ago it seemed Ardour was going to migrate
to a self contained binary model (like Renoise or EnergyXT has).
Adi, Well hmmm
I can't elaborate much more than that unfortunately, it was not discussed
in specifics but a standalone binary (like the others you mentioned) was
the general idea, Seablade also said something similar on the Ardour forum
recently again without any detail.
A sincere and heartfelt
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:43:48AM -0800, i...@bandshed.net wrote:
#Experimental
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ experimental main non-free contrib
deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ experimental main non-free contrib
However there doesn't seem to be any of the pkg-multimedia
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz wrote:
There are many packages that are crucial for audio on desktop like lash,
qjackctl, libjackasyn.
Back to this since libjackasyn [1] seems unuseful at all: it is
superseded by jack, orphaned and, plus, upstream
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 22.11.2010 10:18, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
This is bad: t-p-u does not get the same exposure and automated
testing time before sliding into testing. This means a higher burden
on the Release team for such
bristol_0.60.7-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
bristol_0.60.7-2.dsc
bristol_0.60.7-2.debian.tar.gz
bristol_0.60.7-2_i386.deb
bristol-data_0.60.7-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Accepted:
bristol-data_0.60.7-2_all.deb
to main/b/bristol/bristol-data_0.60.7-2_all.deb
bristol_0.60.7-2.debian.tar.gz
to main/b/bristol/bristol_0.60.7-2.debian.tar.gz
bristol_0.60.7-2.dsc
to main/b/bristol/bristol_0.60.7-2.dsc
bristol_0.60.7-2_i386.deb
to
faad2_2.7-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
faad2_2.7-6.dsc
faad2_2.7-6.diff.gz
libfaad-dev_2.7-6_amd64.deb
libfaad2_2.7-6_amd64.deb
faad2-dbg_2.7-6_amd64.deb
faad_2.7-6_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Reject Reasons:
'dpkg-source -x' failed for faad2_2.7-6.dsc [return code: 29].
[dpkg-source output:] gpg: Signature made Tue Nov 23 00:50:35 2010 UTC using
DSA key ID E5F13196
[dpkg-source output:] gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
[dpkg-source output:] dpkg-source:
faad2_2.7-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
faad2_2.7-6.dsc
faad2_2.7-6.diff.gz
libfaad-dev_2.7-6_amd64.deb
libfaad2_2.7-6_amd64.deb
faad2-dbg_2.7-6_amd64.deb
faad_2.7-6_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Accepted:
faad2-dbg_2.7-6_amd64.deb
to main/f/faad2/faad2-dbg_2.7-6_amd64.deb
faad2_2.7-6.diff.gz
to main/f/faad2/faad2_2.7-6.diff.gz
faad2_2.7-6.dsc
to main/f/faad2/faad2_2.7-6.dsc
faad_2.7-6_amd64.deb
to main/f/faad2/faad_2.7-6_amd64.deb
libfaad-dev_2.7-6_amd64.deb
to
Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 01:32:13 +
with message-id e1pkhjx-0005hg...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#603807: fixed in faad2 2.7-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #603807,
regarding faad segfaults on amd64 due to incorrect pointer size
to be marked as done.
This means that
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:12:02AM +, ales...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
First build with JACK session support.
- libjack-dev
+ libjack-jackd2-dev (= 1.9.6~dfsg.1-3~)
JACK session support is a JACK v2 only thing?
If not, I believe we should instead invent a new virtual package
41 matches
Mail list logo
