Hello,
I have been redirected here from Debian-KDE mailing list. I was asking
for someone who packages kmid2, the port to KDE4 of kmid. It seems that
the original RFP (bug #578750) has been ignored since the past May 2010,
and that the original packager has left Kmid probably for personal
Please do consider using a wiki page for this.
Still makes sense to discuss entries here, but not to keep track of
the progress of it as a whole.
I'll take a look at it. Btw this menus plan fits in the whole 'Debian
Multimedia Blends process' maybe...
Making metapackages and menu
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:04:23PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Please do consider using a wiki page for this.
Still makes sense to discuss entries here, but not to keep track of
the progress of it as a whole.
I'll take a look at it. Btw this menus plan fits in the whole
'Debian
On 01/03/2011 02:40 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:04:23PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Please do consider using a wiki page for this.
Still makes sense to discuss entries here, but not to keep track of
the progress of it as a whole.
I'll take a look at it. Btw
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:48:00PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/03/2011 02:40 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Your introduction and last phrase on that page discourages me from
getting involved, however: Seems you insist on customizing on top of
Debian instead of integrating with Debian
On 01/03/2011 03:09 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:48:00PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/03/2011 02:40 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Your introduction and last phrase on that page discourages me from
getting involved, however: Seems you insist on customizing on
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 03:16:18PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/03/2011 03:09 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:48:00PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/03/2011 02:40 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Your introduction and last phrase on that page discourages me
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 03:46:28AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I am uncertain how happy others here are about other changes that I
would wanna do - starting with enabling build-dependency
auto-resolving a.k.a. that debian/control.in file discussed tonight
regarding a PureData package. So I
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 04:20:16PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 03:46:28AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I am uncertain how happy others here are about other changes that I
would wanna do - starting with enabling build-dependency
auto-resolving a.k.a. that
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 04:52:15PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
What many problems are you referring to?
I was reffering to the use of the auto-updating Build-Depends via
DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL (and #311724), but I noticed now that you
use @cdbs@ without the DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_* thing.
Package: ices2
Version: 2.0.1-9
Severity: normal
A dist-upgrade today upgraded ices2. The new dependencies pulled in
dnet-common, libdnet, libroar0, and muroard which caused the machine
to set the ethernet address to aa:0:4:0:a:4 from its previous address.
This of course caused the network to be
Hi all,
I've just pushed many changes to the deadbeef repo, and I think it is now
almost ready for upload.
I managed to remove most of the bundled library (the other are not present
in Debian) and modified the patches to not phisically remove the additional
code.
I also switched to CDBS
On 01/03/2011 03:52 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 03:16:18PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/03/2011 03:09 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:48:00PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/03/2011 02:40 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Your
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 08:35:56PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/03/2011 03:52 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Target one is to integrate it in Debian.
If your interest is integration with the Debian infrastructure - and
particularly you want to improve the Debian menu system (rather than
reassign 608807 libdnet
severity 608807 important
retitle 608807 libdnet: library should only suggest dnet-common
thanks
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 09:54:16AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
A dist-upgrade today upgraded ices2. The new dependencies pulled in
dnet-common, libdnet, libroar0, and muroard
reflum,
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 09:54 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
Package: ices2
Version: 2.0.1-9
Severity: normal
A dist-upgrade today upgraded ices2. The new dependencies pulled in
dnet-common, libdnet, libroar0, and muroard which caused the machine
to set the ethernet address to
Hi Philipp,
Thanks for your clarification,
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 12:46:21AM +0100, Philipp Schafft wrote:
I suggest to:
close the bug as invalid (it's not ices2's problem) as the install does
exactly what it is suppost to do: it try to set up the system in a way
all features works
OR
reassign 608807 libdnet
severity 608807 important
retitle 608807 libdnet: library should only suggest dnet-common
thanks
[sent again - now cc'ed cont...@bugs.debian.org to actually take effect]
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website:
Hi Multimedia Packaging Wizards and Wizardrettes!
I'm a long-time Debian user. I mainly work in perl. I'm
author of nama, a text/graphic UI for multitrack recording
based on Ecasound, and maintain a couple of CPAN modules.
I've got an alioth account, bolangi-guest, and have
been involved in the
19 matches
Mail list logo
