Re: jackd1, jackd2, jackd3, tschack

2010-04-17 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
Hi guys, I'm new to the list but joined to see if I could help with the {j,tsch}ack{1,2,3} issue. :-) On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:37:45PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote: jackd2 shouldn't be considered the successor of jackd1, but an alternative

Re: packaging jack...

2010-04-17 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: stop right here. the library and the daemon are tied together. the protocol between jackd and libjack is NOT fixed. (basically i consider it a mistake to even have libjack and jackd in different packages) but it might make sense to have that.

Re: packaging jack...

2010-04-17 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: When you register with libjack, it will start the daemon if it is not already running. So, you can't have the library without the daemon.[*] That sounds like trouble: if such application is invoked inside a chroot, it causes a mess! Debian

Re: packaging jack - details on plan B

2010-04-23 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
Hi guys, I'm new to the details of deb packaging... so I may be replying to the wrong snippets... but: Package: libjack-jackd2-0 Provides: libjack-0.116.0 Conflicts: libjack0 Yes, something like that. 4. Release jackd1 to experimental, with libjack0 providing virtual package

Re: packaging jack - details on plan B

2010-04-23 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
Hi Jonas, On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: [3] Going backwards has never been promised, though. A program compiled against 0.118.0 will work with 0.34.0. However, the use of weak symbols for new features may make this available. Isn't it exactly going backwards if

Re: packaging jack - details on plan B

2010-04-23 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 02:32:45PM -0500, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: [1] http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/SuggestedPackagingApproach Note that this is a wiki and the suggestions come from only one person. True, but Nedko (the author

Re: packaging jack - cross-distro coordination

2010-04-24 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 02:39:16AM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote: We instantly switch to jackd2. End of the story. Thanks for a clear cut message. I can accept that. For Squeeze, I'm OK with this, too. -gabriel

Re: packaging jack - details on plan B

2010-04-26 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com To: Gabriel M. Beddingfield gabrb...@gmail.com Cc: Jack-Devel jack-de...@lists.jackaudio.org Subject: Re: [Jack-Devel] packaging jack - details on plan B (fwd) On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Gabriel M. Beddingfield gabrb...@gmail.com wrote: Jack Devs: Please see

Re: packaging jack - details on plan B

2010-04-26 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Gabriel M. Beddingfield gabrb...@gmail.com wrote: ABI back-compatibility has never been assured - if a program was linked against JACK API M.N.m and the runtime installation is a version earlier than

Re: Bug#580262: idjc: Mixer reports segmentation fault

2010-05-04 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Stefan Bischoff wrote: Mixer reports a segmentation fault mixer crashed something bad happened and IDJC could not continue Unfortunately, if /anything/ crashes in idjcmixer... you get this same error message. So, some manner of backtrace is really necc. in order to

Re: Rekindle jack implementation swapping discussion (was Re: Request to join the Debian Multimedia Team)

2010-05-29 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
On Sat, 29 May 2010, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2010-April/009046.html That contained Adrian putting his foot down to stop the debate and say: we switch to jackd2 now. No one disagreed. But, he went on to say we could

-dbg packages... policy?

2010-07-12 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
Hi guys, Does Debian have any sort of policy about when there should and should not be a -dbg package? As an upstream author, I personally prefer having -dbg packages for all packages. Thanks, Gabriel ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing

Re: Rtkit in pkg-multimedia.

2010-11-02 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, rosea.grammostola wrote: Uh, rtkit? Is that something else then Rtirq http://www.rncbc.org/drupal/node/107 Yes, it is something else. RtKit is pulseaudio's solution to giving normal users RT-priviledge. It is not specific to an -rt kernel. RTIRQ, on the other hand,

Re: Rtkit in pkg-multimedia.

2010-11-02 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, rosea.grammostola wrote: RtKit is pulseaudio's solution to giving normal users RT-priviledge. It is not specific to an -rt kernel. RT via pulseaudio? Hmm ok. No, RT via DBUS. It's not directly related to pulseaudio, but it was created to solve some of PA's problems

Re: Packaging 'stretchplayer'

2010-11-28 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
Hi Arnout, On Sunday, November 28, 2010 11:44:42 am Arnout Engelen wrote: I started on packaging stretchplayer (ITP 605256) - which was fairly easy because upstream (Gabriel M. Beddingfield) already had an ubuntu package ready. Thank you! W: stretchplayer source: source-nmu-has-incorrect

Re: Packaging 'stretchplayer'

2010-11-28 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
On Sunday, November 28, 2010 12:49:44 pm Paul Tagliamonte wrote: There was an odd license on it, too, iirc. Looks like it's regular GPLv2+ now Cool. I remember reading something about a stipulation of using it with Jesus or something like that. That might have just been the Readme. I

Re: [SCM] stretchplayer/master: add a simple manpage

2010-11-29 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Arnout Engelen wrote: I should, of course, send this manpage to Gabriel so he can include it in the upstream package - haven't gotten around to that yet though. I grabbed it from your git. I'll add it upstream. Thank you! -gabriel

Re: source code request

2011-01-10 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
On Monday, January 10, 2011 10:22:27 pm george germain wrote: libffado2 version: 2.0.99+svn1924-1 maybe send a tarball or link 2 one? ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/libf/libffado/ ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Re: Bug#629105: hydrogen: Purports to handle SVG files

2011-06-03 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote: In the file manager Thunar, Hydrogen is presented as a handler for SVG files. Is this caused by the line MimeType=text/xml; in /usr/share/applications/hydrogen.desktop ? Perhaps SVG is a subset of XML? So, in claiming to handle XML,

[PATCH] Correct typo in cmake build type (was RelWithoutDebInfo)

2011-07-24 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
The build type RelWithoutDebInfo does not exist. It should be RelWithDebInfo. --- debian/changelog |6 +- debian/rules |2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 7d56460..67d50fc 100644 --- a/debian/changelog