request for membership, ITA

2010-08-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
dear pkg-multimedia team! i'm the upstream author of several multimedia related packages, some of which are already in debian (most prominently gem and pd-zexy). most (of not all) of these packages are centered around the computer music language puredata. all of them have originally been

Re: request for membership, ITA

2010-08-12 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-11 17:59, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:38:32PM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: dear pkg-multimedia team! i'm the upstream author of several multimedia related packages, some of which are already in debian (most prominently gem and pd-zexy). Yeah, more

Re: request for membership, ITA

2010-08-12 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-11 16:04, Felipe Sateler wrote: I have just added you to the team on alioth. Welcome! cool thank you. First import the packages in the team's git repository (and be sure to enable the commit notifications to the pkg-multimedia-commits list). Also, read our wiki page for some

Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

2010-08-16 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-16 03:31, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I'm not a pd expert, but if I install some extensions, I expect to be able to use them right away, without having to invoke pd with special args. I'm getting the impression that we are not living up to that expectation. You can use them

Re: Licensing of gmerlin-avdecoder regression tests

2010-08-16 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-16 13:21, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: As I understand it, in principle we are safe if we can ensure that 4-clause BSD only affects code parts that are not compiled into any of the binary code that we redistribute. Ideal for us (and for other distributors, I guess) would be if those

Re: gmerlin-avdecoder redux

2010-08-16 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
be compatible with GPL: On 2010-08-16 16:47, Romain Beauxis wrote: Le lundi 16 août 2010 07:36:05, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit : the Debian packages currently - exclude the libw32dll stuff (see other post) - exclude the GSM610stuff (see other post) I fail to see why this piece of code had

pd-zexy

2010-08-17 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
ok, i think the pd-zexy package is almost ready for release. i rephrased the README.Debian, hopefully it's clearer now debian/changelog has better wording for quiltification maintainer is now pkg-multimedia-maintainers@ (at least in debian/control.in; how do i update debian/control from that;

Re: pd-zexy

2010-08-17 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-17 14:56, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:55:37PM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: ok, i think the pd-zexy package is almost ready for release. i rephrased the README.Debian, hopefully it's clearer now debian/changelog has better wording for quiltification

Re: pd-zexy

2010-08-17 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-17 15:45, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 17.08.2010 15:34, schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig: but i guess that (c) is clear enough. According to lintian (C) is not considered as a valid way to express the copyright ownership. The word Copyright or the © symbol should be used instead

Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

2010-08-17 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-17 17:39, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:16:09PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 15:35:10 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: README.txt and LICENSE.txt are part of the Pd library format. They this should read: are part of a Pd library

Re: pd-zexy

2010-08-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-17 18:36, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: So I dare ignore your but above and (parallel to continuing below my but was really mostly their, as the discussion on debian/copyright and the discussion on how the upstream copyright headers look like intermingled. they should be discussed

Re: pd-zexy (debian/copyright)

2010-08-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-17 18:36, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: So I dare ignore your but above and (parallel to continuing below discussion) I will start working on copyright-check and rewriting debian/copyright using DEP5 machine-readable format. If you disagree with that, please shout, so I can stop

Re: pd-zexy (upstream copyright)

2010-08-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-18 14:27, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: thanks for the hint. i noticed that upstream's README.txt includes several more authors, which do not appear in any source file and definitely not (yet) in debian/changelog Please have a look at the changes I pushed just now, especially the

Re: pd-zexy (upstream copyright)

2010-08-19 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-18 20:38, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: After I stomped the topmost one about source URL (puredata.info was down earlier today, apparently), there are now 2 FIXMEs left. Upper one is obviously a typo, so not a show-stopper. I would suggest you fix it upstream for your next release,

Re: pd-zexy (upstream copyright)

2010-08-19 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-19 10:23, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2010-08-18 20:38, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: After I stomped the topmost one about source URL (puredata.info was down earlier today, apparently), there are now 2 FIXMEs left. ah i was so busy answering your questions, that i forgot to rephrase

Re: pd-zexy (upstream copyright)

2010-08-19 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-19 10:53, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: debian/copyright still needs to be maintained by hand. There is not yet any DEP5 validators or parsers, only the work-in-progress definition itself, at http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ - so hava a go at reading that :-) thanks for the

Re: pd-zexy compilation improvements

2010-08-23 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-22 20:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Indeed this looks weird. If you consider it sane to use this approach then I guess it won't matter much. But striving towards the ultimate, if this is a dirty hack then please elaborate on possible alternative approaches - even if tricky to

Re: pd-zexy compilation improvements

2010-08-23 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-22 20:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: We should simply suppress the sse flag on 32bit x86, in my opinion. Or if it really hurts, we should either a) offer to variants or b) convince upstream to implement support for both and detect at runtime if optimized code whould be used or not.

Re: pd-zexy compilation improvements

2010-08-23 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-23 09:25, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2010-08-22 20:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: anyhow, i had a look at the debian policy, and it says (in chapter 10.2 Libraries on todays http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html): If the package is architecture: any

Re: pd-zexy compilation improvements

2010-08-23 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-23 09:58, Reinhard Tartler wrote: If they are indeed in non-standard paths such that the dynamic linker doesn't see it without setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH or similar, then you're right. But.. nevertheless, it complies with it... even on amd64? There are some architectures that are

Re: first package: pd-wiimote

2010-09-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-09-06 17:49, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Every tarball should have a file in it that contains the license. Having that be a standard name like LICENSE.txt makes it really easy to find for people who are doing things like packaging Pd libraries for Debian. Also, the LICENSE.txt is

Re: Puredata package

2010-09-15 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-09-14 22:41, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Honestly, I think he's heard it enough about it from IOhannes and me. I think it would be helpful if others could start the discussion with him. even though paul is really not very responsive these days i would hate to do anything with one

Re: RFS: v4l2loopback (ITP:598241)

2010-09-28 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-09-28 14:14, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2010-09-28 13:46, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Yeah! I need this very functionality. Awesome! cool. btw, i have a gstreamer element gst-v4l2loopback to interface with the loopback module in my packaging pipeline as well. fgamsdr IOhannes

Re: RFS: v4l2loopback (ITP:598241)

2010-09-29 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-09-28 14:14, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: How about teaming up instead? sure, why not. so should i just move the git repository from collab-maint into pkg-multimedia? fgamsdr IOhannes smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

new package: pd-iemnet (ITP:#599229)

2010-10-19 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
hi all, me and roman have packaged a new pd-library called pd-iemnet (ITP:#599229), that adds networking infrastructure on the transport layer to Pd. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-iemnet.git git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/pd-iemnet.git it would be great if somebody

Re: new package: pd-iemnet (ITP:#599229)

2010-10-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-10-19 15:54, Reinhard Tartler wrote: A few things that you might want to check and fix: Now running lintian... argh, usually i always run lintian -I -E --pedantic before pushing. seems like i forgot it this time... W: pd-iemnet:

Re: [SCM] pd-iemnet/master: watch file sourceforge

2010-10-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-10-20 11:17, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 09:04:28AM +, zmoelnig-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: watch file sourceforge --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/watch @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +version=3 +http://sf.net/pure-data/iemnet-(.*)\.tar\.gz Please consider to

Re: new package: pd-iemnet (ITP:#599229)

2010-10-25 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-10-20 11:06, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2010-10-19 15:54, Reinhard Tartler wrote: anyhow, now that i have run lintian in pedantic/... mode, i have also fixed the warnings about: since i believe that everything is fixed now, could somebody have a look again and eventually upload

Re: [SCM] pd-iemnet/master: watch file sourceforge

2010-10-28 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-10-27 21:31, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Mi, Okt 20, 2010 at 11:04:28 (CEST), zmoelnig-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 615adb5ed59a6770c787fb4492a1ec1b84a41724 Author: IOhannes m zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at Date:

Re: Comments regarding pd-arraysize_0.1-1_amd64.changes

2010-11-04 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-11-04 22:51, Felipe Sateler wrote: Yeah, it is annoying for sure. The problem is that this particular object is widely used and has been distributed and used like this since 2003ish. Can't it be distributed within puredata itself? hmm, i'd rather have the puredata package follow

Re: Bug#602558: pd-zexy: Built with -mfpmath=sse -msse which desupports athlons, anything else older than pentium3

2010-11-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-11-05 21:40, Robert Jacobs wrote: Subject: pd-zexy: Built with -mfpmath=sse -msse which desupports athlons, anything else older than pentium3 Package: pd-zexy Version: 2.2.3-1 Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** My desktop (still an athlon tbird)

Re: Comments regarding pd-arraysize_0.1-1_amd64.changes

2010-11-08 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-11-07 19:57, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: i think this is to be discussed on this list. i don't know whether it's good practice, and esp. i don't know whether its worse practice than creating a debian package for 2 smallish files. It is not good practice, it is a special case based

Re: Comments regarding pd-arraysize_0.1-1_amd64.changes

2010-11-08 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-11-07 19:57, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: i would sugggest to use a Suggests: pd-pddp at the most. First off, its key to mention to those not familiar with Pd: the help patches are fully functional scripts, not just static documentation. So yes, thanks for making the clear to

Re: pd-zexy_2.2.3-2 (please)

2010-11-08 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-27 12:22, IOhannes zmölnig wrote: i think the current git for pd-zexy includes 2 fixes that would justify a new upload: - fixes kFreeBSD / hurd issue (build-system guessing the wrong module.extension) - fixes policy-violation (sse-binaries on x86) if you agree it would be

Re: pd-zexy_2.2.3-2 (please)

2010-11-09 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-11-09 01:01, Felipe Sateler wrote: I will look at pd-zexy package now. Uploaded. thanks. Comment from lintian to fix upstream: I: pd-zexy: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/lib/pd/extra/zexy/zexy.pd_linux treshold threshold i think i'll have to add a lintian override for

note on v4l2loopback (was Re: pd-zexy_2.2.3-2 (please))

2010-11-09 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-11-08 13:04, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: (re) posted which packages need my help. There was a V4L2 kernel module too, I recall... ah sorry i forgot about that. i eventually found an agreement with Nobuhiro Iwamatsu (the maintainer of the vloopback (v4l1loopback) package), who sponsored

pristine-tar (was Re: pd-zexy_2.2.3-2 (please))

2010-11-09 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-11-09 11:52, Felipe Sateler wrote: No problem. BTW, there seems to be something odd with the pristine-tar data in the repository, the generated tarball does not fit the one currently in the archive (that's why we got 2 REJECTED messages). Which one is wrong? hmm, it seems they are

Re: new Pd packages looking for sponsors

2010-11-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-11-09 22:51, Felipe Sateler wrote: pd-pan Please update the changelog when updating the package. The timestamp helps people tell when was the last time someone worked on a package. Also the long description is too short hmm, this confuses me a bit. i thought that the changelog

Re: Thoughts on pd object packaging - use of cdbs might be preferable?

2010-11-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-11-11 09:09, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/standard-pd-object.mk What do you think? That looks very handy, but I think the given library template is well tuned. well, i think the template library Makefile fails on the the kfreebsd and hurd platforms (at

Re: new package: jacktrip

2010-11-29 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-11-29 11:37, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:51:29AM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: On 11/26/2010 12:24 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: so according to my tests it worked... Great. Sorry for my noise, then :-) cool, does this mean the package is ready for

Bug#605827: pd-iemnet: FTBFS on non-Linux: undefined references

2010-12-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-12-03 21:26, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Source: pd-iemnet Version: 0.1-1 Severity: important Hi, your package FTBFS on non-Linux with undefined references: thanks for reporting. this hould be fixed in the next upload. @pkg-multimedia-maintainers: i have updated the git repository

Re: Bug#605827: pd-iemnet: FTBFS on non-Linux: undefined references

2010-12-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-12-06 18:23, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2010-12-03 21:26, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Source: pd-iemnet Version: 0.1-1 Severity: important Hi, your package FTBFS on non-Linux with undefined references: thanks for reporting. this hould be fixed in the next upload. @pkg

Re: Bug#605827: pd-iemnet: FTBFS on non-Linux: undefined references

2010-12-07 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-12-06 18:34, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: i just noticed that i forgot the fixes: #605827 clause in the git commits. should i just regenerate the changelog, add the fixes clause and commit and then wait for somebody to upload the package? i found a loophole the push a sensible commit

q: excluding upstream files from tarball

2010-12-14 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
i have a question on how the exclusion of files from the upstream tarball can be handled and maintained. as far as i understand, you just use $ git-import-orig --filter=*proprietary* /path/to/upstream_1.0.tar.gz which will exclude all files matching *proprietary* from the debian upstream tarball

Re: q: excluding upstream files from tarball

2010-12-16 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 darn, i wrote a long reply to this but then we had a power failure and the mail is gone On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 05:54:36PM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: shouldn't all this exclusion be documented somewhere, e.g. in debian/README.source

gmerlin new upstream!

2011-01-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi all, burkhard plaum has finally released a new version of gmerlin/gavl/gmerlin-avdecoder. i see that alessio already started with updating gavl. i tried to do the same with gmerlin and gmerling-avdecoder, and pushed my changes (so far, far from

Re: [SCM] gmerlin-avdecoder/master: disable building of GSM610 code

2011-01-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-10 13:32, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:14:15PM +, zmoelnig-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit c7e3544823a44941ab82bec39652605874a2c4b8

Re: gmerlin new upstream!

2011-01-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-10 14:53, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Instead of filtering during import, do it earlier on using CDBS: debian/rules get-orig-source That should get you both the pristine tarball and next to that the repackaged one. thanks. for

Re: gmerlin new upstream contains BSD-4-clause licensed code :-(

2011-01-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-10 18:18, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 05:51:53PM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Please elaborate, instead of expecting us all to be online: The URL

Re: gmerlin new upstream contains BSD-4-clause licensed code :-(

2011-01-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-10 18:34, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: well, i think this can be easily handled, by just excluding the bg_sem.h from the dfsg~orig and fixing the files that include bg_sem.h to be more clear: the given file is basically: snip

Re: [SCM] gmerlin packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.0.0_dfsg, created. upstream/1.0.0_dfsg

2011-01-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-11 00:12, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:01 PM, zmoelnig-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The annotated tag, upstream/1.0.0_dfsg has been created at 3169115de337545bb0cd0b6b881855729e05feb8 (tag) tagging

Re: [SCM] gmerlin/master: Revert Switch libgmerlin-dev's Architecture to all.

2011-01-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-11 09:42, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2011-01-11 00:06, ales...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: Package: libgmerlin-dev -Architecture: all +Architecture: any Section: libdevel -Depends: libgmerlin0 (= ${source:Version

Re: [SCM] gmerlin packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.0.0_dfsg, created. upstream/1.0.0_dfsg

2011-01-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-11 11:04, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 9:33 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote: aye, done. it seems like the pristine-tar branch did not get automatically updated when using the git-import-orig. It does

Re: [SCM] gmerlin/master: Bumped standards to 3.9.1

2011-01-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-11 11:48, Alessio Treglia wrote: Please don't touch debian/control, make your changes to debian/control.in. We'll regenerate debian/control later. ouch yes. fgmasdr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10

Re: [SCM] gmerlin/master: put internal binaries into /usr/lib/gmerlin

2011-01-12 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-12 16:39, zmoelnig-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +Author: IOhannes m zmölnig +Description: move gmerlin_visualizer_slave into /usr/lib/gmerlin/bin +as this program is not to be started from the cmdline but

Re: [SCM] gmerlin/master: move images from libgmerlin-doc to gmerlin-doc

2011-01-12 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-12 16:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 03:39:53PM +, zmoelnig-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: move images from libgmerlin-doc to gmerlin-doc the images are only used by the main documentation, not in

build-depend version with dfsg

2011-01-12 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 while packaging gmerlin-avdecoder i noticed a slight problem with the build-depends: it used to be libgmerlin-dev (= 1.0.0) but since gmerlin has to be repackaged (to be dfsg compliant), the actually installed version is 1.0.0~dfsg-1 now i don't

gmerlin-avdecoder ready?

2011-01-12 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 afaict, gmerlin-avdecoder is ready! anybody interested, please check out: git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/gmerlin-avdecoder the package depends on the new version of libgmerlin which is not yet uploaded (nor 100% ready afaict), but to me

Re: gmerlin-avdecoder ready?

2011-01-12 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-12 20:54, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: afaict, gmerlin-avdecoder is ready! at least, once alessio finishes his commits :-) fgmasdf# IOhannes anybody interested, please check out: git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/gmerlin

Re: gmerlin-avdecoder ready?

2011-01-13 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-12 21:12, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 08:54:20PM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: the package depends on the new version of libgmerlin which is not yet uploaded (nor 100% ready afaict), but to me that's the only

Re: gmerlin-avdecoder ready?

2011-01-13 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-12 22:04, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 09:14:40PM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote: The clean target in debian/rules needs some work: Looks like new upstream release ships with automade files. Then sure it needs

Re: gmerlin-avdecoder ready?

2011-01-13 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-13 14:30, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: That ~bpo up thre is an indication of complication. given that a core dependency of gmerlin-avdeocer (namely: gavl) uses dh-autoreconf as well, i guess we can just use it. fgasdf IOhannes -BEGIN

Re: [SCM] gmerlin-avdecoder/master: use dh-autoreconf for re-configuring sources

2011-01-13 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-13 15:26, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 2:42 PM, zmoelnig-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index d216d4b..3425301 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -21,6

Re: [SCM] gmerlin-avdecoder/master: use dh-autoreconf for re-configuring sources

2011-01-13 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-13 16:25, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2011-01-13 15:26, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 2:42 PM, zmoelnig-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index d216d4b..3425301 100755

Re: [SCM] gmerlin-avdecoder/master: use dh-autoreconf for re-configuring sources

2011-01-13 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-13 16:30, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2011-01-13 16:25, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2011-01-13 15:26, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 2:42 PM, zmoelnig-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: diff --git a/debian/rules b

Re: gmerlin-avdecoder ready?

2011-01-13 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-13 14:44, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: given that a core dependency of gmerlin-avdeocer (namely: gavl) uses dh-autoreconf as well, i guess we can just use it. so after playing around with dh-autoreconf, i see that it basically does what

Re: [SCM] gmerlin-avdecoder/master: clean up on 'clean'

2011-01-17 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-16 22:19, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: the problem is: - - we strip some directories to get dfsg-clean code - - we patch autotools to reflect these changes - - when doing clean, the quilt-patches are not applied, thus autotools do not know

Re: [SCM] gmerlin packaging annotated tag, debian/1.0.0_dfsg-1, created. debian/1.0.0_dfsg-1

2011-01-17 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-17 00:52, ales...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The annotated tag, debian/1.0.0_dfsg-1 has been created at 8b8ded6e2904fabf074556866ae817d132037ccf (tag) tagging 98a7f526e6b2cd5d51a9dbc77c7c95141d9f956b (commit) replaces

new package: gmerlin-encoders

2011-01-17 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi all, since we now (almost) have the newest versions of gavl, gmerlin and gmerlin-avdecoder in debian, i thought i give the last of the gmerlin-packages a try: gmerlin-encoders. the package is an addon to gmerlin, adding a number of

Re: gmerlin-avdecoder ready (2nd try)

2011-01-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-17 22:13, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: AFAIK, gmerlin-avdecoder does not require gmerlin, only libgavl of the gmerlin suite. At least when I packaged gmerlin-avdecoder for Fink, that was the case. yes and no. afaik, if

Re: gmerlin-avdecoder ready (2nd try)

2011-01-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-18 01:12, Alessio Treglia wrote: Reviewed and uploaded, thanks! cooll, however i noticed something bad: gmerlin-avdecoder will build a binary-package libgmerlin-avdec1. now gmerlin has a recommends line, in order to make use of this

Re: gmerlin-avdecoder ready (2nd try)

2011-01-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-18 09:54, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2011-01-18 01:12, Alessio Treglia wrote: Reviewed and uploaded, thanks! cooll, however i noticed something bad: gmerlin-avdecoder will build a binary-package libgmerlin-avdec1. now gmerlin

Re: [SCM] gmerlin/master: Finalize changelog.

2011-01-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 alessio, On 2011-01-18 11:42, ales...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit d915827543dfe3b8f132f1dbee5c931b5db6ee93 Author: Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org Date: Tue Jan 18 11:42:16

Re: [SCM] gmerlin-encoders/master: split gmerlin-encoders into several binary packages

2011-01-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-18 12:07, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:05 PM, zmoelnig-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: +Replaces: gmerlin-encoders ( 1.0.0-1) +Breaks: gmerlin-encoders ( 1.0.0-1) Please remove these, I'd prefer to ask

Re: [SCM] gmerlin-encoders/master: split gmerlin-encoders into several binary packages

2011-01-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-18 12:18, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:16 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote: i guess the same applies to gmerlin-avdecoder then? Of course, I'm asking FTP-masters to remove them right now. done

Re: Adoptiong ecasound

2011-01-31 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-01-31 10:36, Joel Roth wrote: otoh, i guess this would not have pulled in automatic ruby/python dependencies, as the shebang does. Do the existing shebangs in the ruby/python test scripts accomplish this? oh, i thought you said

pd-iemmatrix

2011-02-08 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 pd-iemmatrix is another library for puredata, this time adding 100 objects for manipulating 2 dimensional matrices with a vocabulary similar to that of octave/matlab. the package uses CDBS. the package has a single lintian Warning:

pd-readanyfs~

2011-02-09 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Roman and me proudly present another pd-library, this time it is pd-readanysf~, an object to read a large number of audiofiles (and streams). it uses gavl/gmerlin-avdecoder (maintained by pkg-multimedia!) as decoding backend. the pacakging VCS can be

Re: pd-readanyfs~

2011-02-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-02-10 12:48, Felipe Sateler wrote: Please split the patch into several, one for each fix. It makes it darn :-) i made it one big patch because they most likely won't apply if one of them is missing anyhow (they all work on the same few

Re: pd-readanyfs~

2011-02-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-02-10 12:48, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:52, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote: ping, pong the witch is dead. took a bit longer, as i discovered that alessio was not given proper credit. fgmasdr IOhannes

Re: Bug#612887: please avoid the dependency on several sound servers

2011-03-08 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-03-06 18:19, Felipe Sateler wrote: ALSA need not be in another package, since a system without alsa would be really weird. i have plenty of systems without alsa, which i don't consider to be weird (even though i probably won't install cmus

Bug#620994: [pd-pdogg] ogg not capitalized in descriptions

2011-04-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-04-05 20:23, Filipus Klutiero wrote: Package: pd-pdogg Version: 0.25-1 Severity: minor The short description reads: a collection of ogg/vorbis objects for Pd Ogg is a proper noun and must be capitalized. It also appears in the

request for upload of pd-pdogg (was Re: Bug#620994: [pd-pdogg] ogg not capitalized in descriptions)

2011-04-19 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 while fixing the capitalization of the description of pd-pdogg, i noticed that there is also an FTBFS (#609433). i fixed both (FTBFS is fixed with an upstream bugfix release, which was uploaded today, so it doesn't show up in uscan yet), and pushed

please upload: pd-cxc

2011-04-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 some of the pd-packages have an FTBFS bug reported. i fixed all of those packages (i knew of), and would appreciate if somebody could upload the package, as given in the subject (i admit i don't type this entire letter for each of the packages).

please upload: pd-ekext

2011-04-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 some of the pd-packages have an FTBFS bug reported. i fixed all of those packages (i knew of), and would appreciate if somebody could upload the package, as given in the subject (i admit i don't type this entire letter for each of the packages).

please upload: pd-bsaylor

2011-04-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 some of the pd-packages have an FTBFS bug reported. i fixed all of those packages (i knew of), and would appreciate if somebody could upload the package, as given in the subject (i admit i don't type this entire letter for each of the packages).

please upload: pd-markex

2011-04-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 some of the pd-packages have an FTBFS bug reported. i fixed all of those packages (i knew of), and would appreciate if somebody could upload the package, as given in the subject (i admit i don't type this entire letter for each of the packages).

please upload: pd-maxlib

2011-04-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 some of the pd-packages have an FTBFS bug reported. i fixed all of those packages (i knew of), and would appreciate if somebody could upload the package, as given in the subject (i admit i don't type this entire letter for each of the packages).

please upload: pd-mjlib

2011-04-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 some of the pd-packages have an FTBFS bug reported. i fixed all of those packages (i knew of), and would appreciate if somebody could upload the package, as given in the subject (i admit i don't type this entire letter for each of the packages).

please upload: pd-sigpack

2011-04-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 some of the pd-packages have an FTBFS bug reported. i fixed all of those packages (i knew of), and would appreciate if somebody could upload the package, as given in the subject (i admit i don't type this entire letter for each of the packages).

please upload: pd-smlib

2011-04-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 some of the pd-packages have an FTBFS bug reported. i fixed all of those packages (i knew of), and would appreciate if somebody could upload the package, as given in the subject (i admit i don't type this entire letter for each of the packages).

please upload: pd-windowing

2011-04-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 some of the pd-packages have an FTBFS bug reported. i fixed all of those packages (i knew of), and would appreciate if somebody could upload the package, as given in the subject (i admit i don't type this entire letter for each of the packages).

please upload: pd-pdogg

2011-04-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 some of the pd-packages have an FTBFS bug reported. i fixed all of those packages (i knew of), and would appreciate if somebody could upload the package, as given in the subject (i admit i don't type this entire letter for each of the packages).

pd-cyclone: versioning scheme?

2011-04-21 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 looking through potential problems of packages in my area of interest, i stumbled across pd-cyclone, which seems to have an incorrect debian/watch file: debian package is 0.1~alpha55-2 while uscan finds the upstream 0.1-alpha53-src to be more recent..

Re: pd-cyclone: versioning scheme?

2011-04-21 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-04-21 12:56, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On 11-04-21 at 11:10am, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: looking through potential problems of packages in my area of interest, i stumbled across pd-cyclone, which seems to have an incorrect debian/watch

Re: please upload: pd-pdogg

2011-04-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
I see that some bugs (buils system, mostly) will require uploading all (or most) of the pd externals. Can we do something to avoid that? hmm, i'm not sure if i understand what you mean: i thought bugs can only be fixed by providing fixed versions. if a package is FTBFS because of broken

Re: please upload: pd-pdogg

2011-04-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 06:26:37PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On 11-04-24 at 12:16pm, Felipe Sateler wrote: This is the key part: for most pd externals, the makefile is essentially the same. Does it make sense to centralize that? What do others think? Do you mean using CDBS for

Re: hold uploading pd-cxc, pd-ekext, pd-bsaylor, pd-markex, pd-mjlib, pd-sigpack, pd-smlib, pd-windowing, and pd-pdogg

2011-04-26 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-04-25 23:10, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: go ahead. But you also changed other things as well. apart from the ominous change from Depend to Suggest, the other other changes were fixes for lintian warnings and adding Vcs-stanzas to

Re: hold uploading pd-cxc, pd-ekext, pd-bsaylor, pd-markex, pd-mjlib, pd-sigpack, pd-smlib, pd-windowing, and pd-pdogg

2011-04-26 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-04-26 10:31, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: So, instead of saying that it is easy to roll back I suggest that you roll it back yourself, IOhannes, since you did the change that is clearly disliked - technically correct or not. done. fgmasdr

Re: hold uploading pd-cxc, pd-ekext, pd-bsaylor, pd-markex, pd-mjlib, pd-sigpack, pd-smlib, pd-windowing, and pd-pdogg

2011-04-26 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-04-26 12:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On 11-04-26 at 01:14pm, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2011-04-26 10:31, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: So, instead of saying that it is easy to roll back I suggest that you roll it back yourself, IOhannes

  1   2   >