since the last upload:
- Updated to latest upstream version 0.6
- Updated Standards-Version to 3.9.5
Thanks and best regards,
Joachim Bauch
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740626
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg
Hi,
On 31.03.2014 12:05, Alessio Treglia wrote:
You've come to the right please, I (and maybe some more of us) am
going to give you some guidance.
[...]
thanks for the information and links, creating the git repository and
doing the initial changes. That helped a lot.
I now updated a couple
Hi,
On 03.04.2014 17:06, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am Montag, den 31.03.2014, 08:26 -0400 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
I wonder in what ways libde265 compares to the HEVC decoder we
currently have in libavcodec? Which one is faster? Does one of them
support more HEVC streams? What extra benefit
Hi,
On 03.04.2014 16:49, Joachim Bauch wrote:
[...]
What are the next steps that need to be done for the package to get it
included in Debian? Could you please review the latest changes?
I just updated the source package on mentors.debian.net [1] and created
an ITP bug [2]. Is there anything
Dear all,
I'm still looking for someone to sponsor and upload my package of
libde265.
Source code in Git:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/libde265.git;a=summary
Source package on mentors.debian.net:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/libde265
ITP bug:
Hi Thorsten,
thanks for the feedback to the package. Please find my comments about
LGPLv3 / GPLv3 below.
On 30.07.2014 14:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
According to the file headers (dec265/* and libde265/* both say they are
part of libde265) you
Hi Thorsten,
thanks for the detailed feedback, please see my comments below.
On 30.07.2014 16:05, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
ok, so I would suggest to change the header of those application files
from This file is part of libde265. to something like This file is
part of a sample application to
Hi Fabian,
On 04.08.2014 09:18, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 31.07.2014, 12:02 +0200 schrieb Joachim Bauch:
- Fixed debian/watch to download release tarball, not source tarball.
I don' understand this change. If the release tarball does not contain
the sources, this is most
Dear team,
On 31.07.2014 12:02, Joachim Bauch wrote:
[...]
I understand. We created a new release that contains all your feedback.
@Alessio: could you (or any other uploader) please review my changes
and create/upload a new package of libde265?
I updated the git repository on alioth
Hi Sebastian,
thanks for the detailed feedback.
On 08.08.2014 16:29, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
If Alessio (or someone else) doesn't beat me, here are some points that I'd
like to see fixed before I'd upload it:
[...]
All reported issues have been changed in the repository on alioth.
*
On 08.08.2014 17:21, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
[...]
Please update the date in the changelog trailer to match today's date
(run dch -r again) and then I'll build and upload.
Done.
Best regards,
Joachim
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
On 08.08.2014 17:35, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Uploaded.
Great, thanks!
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Hi Thorsten,
On 30.07.2014 14:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
According to the file headers (dec265/* and libde265/* both say they are
part of libde265) you mix GPLv3- and LGPLv3-code and say that the result
is LGPLv3 (in Readme.md). This is not
Hi all,
there is a new upstream release of libde265 for which I just updated
the packaging on Alioth:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/libde265.git/
Could somebody please review my changes and upload the new package if
all is fine?
Thanks and best regards,
Joachim
Hi Sebastian,
On 16.09.2014 17:46, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
[...]
Thank you for updating the package. Here are remarks:
thanks for the feedback.
* Please do not override binary-without-manpage from lintian. They are
valid warnings. Overrides are there if lintian reports false postives.
Hi Sebastian,
On 16.09.2014 19:33, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Thanks, uploaded!
thanks for uploading.
Joachim
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Sebastian,
On 11.01.2016 17:44, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Thanks for the update. I pushed some changes to switch to automatic dbg
> packages.
thanks.
> The build currently contains
[...]
> I suspect the symbol file needs an update for the new C++11 std::string
> implementation, i.e.
Hi all,
there is a bugfix release of libde265 for which I just updated the
packaging on Alioth:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/libde265.git/
Could somebody please review my changes and upload the new package if
all is fine?
Thanks and best regards,
Joachim
signature.asc
Hi Andreas,
On 08.01.2016 00:08, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> the next version of FFmpeg is planned to be released this month
> (and it might be called 3.0 instead of 2.9).
>
> Since I haven't heard back from you during the past two month
> I'm wondering what the status of
and best regards,
Joachim Bauch
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Hi Sebastian,
thanks for your feedback, I uploaded a new version to mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libheif/libheif_0.0.1+20180206084258+git9d8f256-1.dsc
Additional comments see below.
On 03.02.2018 14:47, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> That fails to build:
>
> | g++
Hi IOhannes,
On 06.02.2018 23:21, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
> On 02/06/2018 10:21 AM, Joachim Bauch wrote:
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>> thanks for your feedback, I uploaded a new version to mentors:
>> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libheif/l
Hi Sebastian,
On 07.02.2018 09:38, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> with the package name changed to libheif1, the package looks good from my
> perspective. One minor nitpick: please remove the dot at the end of the short
> description of libheif1 and add something like "- shared library" at the end.
Hi Sebastian,
On 06.02.2018 10:21, Joachim Bauch wrote:
> thanks for your feedback, I uploaded a new version to mentors:
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libheif/libheif_0.0.1+20180206084258+git9d8f256-1.dsc
a new version based on feedback from IOhannes is available at
Hi Sebastian,
On 13.02.2018 15:45, Joachim Bauch wrote:
> On 07.02.2018 09:38, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> with the package name changed to libheif1, the package looks good from my
>> perspective. One minor nitpick: please remove the dot at the end of the short
>> descriptio
25 matches
Mail list logo
