Bug#587898: differentiate Descriptions

2010-07-06 Thread Fabian Greffrath

Am 06.07.2010 01:01, schrieb jida...@jidanni.org:

All I know is when the user does
$ apt-cache -a show ffmpeg
he notes that yours and Marillat's version are worded differently, but
he can't tell from the surface what the real differences are.


We don't consider it our job to differentiate from inofficial 
third-party packages. It's rather the other way round.




___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#587898: differentiate Descriptions

2010-07-05 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 19:01:50 (EDT), jida...@jidanni.org wrote:

 All I know is when the user does
 $ apt-cache -a show ffmpeg
 he notes that yours and Marillat's version are worded differently, but
 he can't tell from the surface what the real differences are.

as said, please propose a patch, I know that I suck at wording, so this
is very low on my todo list.

I'm going to just close this bug with the next upload with fixing the
grammar issue you've pointed out in the initial mail of this bugreport.

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#587898: differentiate Descriptions

2010-07-05 Thread jidanni
RT I'm going to just close this bug with the next upload with fixing the
RT grammar issue you've pointed out in the initial mail of this bugreport.

I don't know the technical issues. All I know is one package works, the
other doesn't and both packages have cheery descriptions. Closing the
bug is your right however, so I'll step out of the discussion at this point.



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers