2011/11/4 Reinhard Tartler :
> On Fr, Nov 04, 2011 at 15:52:10 (CET), Rodrigo Exterckötter Tjäder wrote:
>
>> Perhaps it would also be good if mplayer and mplayer2 used the
>> alternatives system so that both could provide the mplayer binary?
>
> The two projects are not strictly command line compa
On Fr, Nov 04, 2011 at 15:52:10 (CET), Rodrigo Exterckötter Tjäder wrote:
> Perhaps it would also be good if mplayer and mplayer2 used the
> alternatives system so that both could provide the mplayer binary?
The two projects are not strictly command line compatible and also the
config is AFAIUI
Perhaps it would also be good if mplayer and mplayer2 used the
alternatives system so that both could provide the mplayer binary?
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 623737 upstream
Bug #623737 [mplayer2] Allow install mplayer2 and mplayer together.
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded 623737 http://devel.mplayer2.org/ticket/11
Bug #623737 [mplayer2] Allow install mplayer2 and mplayer together.
Set Bug forw
tags 623737 upstream
forwarded 623737 http://devel.mplayer2.org/ticket/11
stop
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 17:13:48 (CEST), Jose A. Fernandez Gonzalez wrote:
> Subject: Allow install mplayer2 and mplayer together.
> Package: mplayer2
> Version: 2.0-54-gd33877a-1
> Severity: normal
>
> mplayer2 should
Subject: Allow install mplayer2 and mplayer together.
Package: mplayer2
Version: 2.0-54-gd33877a-1
Severity: normal
mplayer2 should not be renamed or provide a symlink "mplayer" because they
are different applications from different projects (and both projects are
still alive).
Both packages can
