On 01/07/2011 01:19 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:16:53PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/06/2011 08:51 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:17:49AM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
also the LAU and LAD list...
What are those acronyms?
Linux
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 10:27:10AM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/07/2011 01:19 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:16:53PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/06/2011 08:51 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:17:49AM +0100, rosea.grammostola
On 01/03/2011 11:28 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 08:35:56PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/03/2011 03:52 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Target one is to integrate it in Debian.
If your interest is integration with the Debian infrastructure - and
particularly you
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:17:49AM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Playing a bit 'advocate of the devil'
1) I don't see other menu categories in the application menu with 3
levels (Wine entry maybe?)
Iceweasel is in Applications / Network / Web Browsing
It seems Science packages are
On 01/06/2011 08:51 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:17:49AM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Playing a bit 'advocate of the devil'
1) I don't see other menu categories in the application menu with 3
levels (Wine entry maybe?)
Iceweasel is in Applications / Network /
Please do consider using a wiki page for this.
Still makes sense to discuss entries here, but not to keep track of
the progress of it as a whole.
I'll take a look at it. Btw this menus plan fits in the whole 'Debian
Multimedia Blends process' maybe...
Making metapackages and menu
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:04:23PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Please do consider using a wiki page for this.
Still makes sense to discuss entries here, but not to keep track of
the progress of it as a whole.
I'll take a look at it. Btw this menus plan fits in the whole
'Debian
On 01/03/2011 02:40 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:04:23PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Please do consider using a wiki page for this.
Still makes sense to discuss entries here, but not to keep track of
the progress of it as a whole.
I'll take a look at it. Btw
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:48:00PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/03/2011 02:40 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Your introduction and last phrase on that page discourages me from
getting involved, however: Seems you insist on customizing on top of
Debian instead of integrating with Debian
On 01/03/2011 03:09 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:48:00PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/03/2011 02:40 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Your introduction and last phrase on that page discourages me from
getting involved, however: Seems you insist on customizing on
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 03:16:18PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/03/2011 03:09 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:48:00PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/03/2011 02:40 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Your introduction and last phrase on that page discourages me
On 01/03/2011 03:52 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 03:16:18PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/03/2011 03:09 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:48:00PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/03/2011 02:40 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Your
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 08:35:56PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/03/2011 03:52 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Target one is to integrate it in Debian.
If your interest is integration with the Debian infrastructure - and
particularly you want to improve the Debian menu system (rather than
On 12/24/2010 01:53 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Great that you put attention to this!
Thanks for your 0.02 ct
An extra menu package dosn't feel very Debian to me, though. Debian
logic is to propose a change to Debian Policy to have the improved
organisation apply universally, not only
On 12/24/2010 02:01 AM, i...@bandshed.net wrote:
Hi,
The problem is in my experience that even if you make a menu with
alternative additional sub menus most packagers create their launchers to
strict freedesktop.org standards and the end user or distributor has to
manually edit and allocate
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:34:54AM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 12/24/2010 01:53 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Great that you put attention to this!
Thanks for your 0.02 ct
Nooo, no, no: Denmark is neither US nor part of Euroland.
Those were my 5 øre ;-)
I tried to keep it as simple
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 03:07:47PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 12/24/2010 02:25 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I suggest as a next step to put it up at http://wiki.debian.org/
somewhere.
[snip]
I would like to get some more feedback from this list first. You could
think of more menu
On 12/24/2010 03:35 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 03:07:47PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 12/24/2010 02:25 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I suggest as a next step to put it up at http://wiki.debian.org/
somewhere.
[snip]
I would like to get some more feedback from
Hi,
The problem is in my experience that even if you make a menu with
alternative additional sub menus most packagers create their launchers to
strict freedesktop.org standards and the end user or distributor has to
manually edit and allocate launchers to the correct submenu. In AV Linux I
have
Hi,
When working with Multimedia / Proaudio on Linux | Debian, you have a
lot of small packages installed pretty soon (one task one tool). With as
consequence a very long list in the menu part for multimedia packages.
Ubuntu Studio tries to make the situation better by providing a
20 matches
Mail list logo
