Re: Bug#614726: FFmpeg 0.6 transition
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:39:19 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > urgent amide/0.9.2-1.1 > urgent soundtouch/1.5.0-4 > urgent portaudio19/19+svn20101113-3 > urgent pcre3/8.12-3 pcre3 now migrated on its own > urgent zoneminder/1.24.2-9 will be 10 days old tonight > urgent audacity/1.3.12-14 > urgent gst-plugins-bad0.10/0.10.19-2.1 > # link ocaml and ffmpeg transitions, not good > remove liquidsoap/0.9.2-3 ocaml-soundtouch/0.1.5-1 liq-contrib/08.11-1 > # ftbfs on armel, unmaintained (#598933) > remove ktoon/0.8.1-4.1 we can keep ktoon as long as we keep libavutil49 > # ftbfs (#615563) > remove cherokee/1.0.8-5 same > # ftbfs (#615654) > remove ihu/0.6.0-2 > # obsolete binary needs decrufting > force soundtouch/1.5.0-4 > and one I forgot: # #612473 - siretart says mplayer-gui is going away anyway force mplayer/2:1.0~rc4.dfsg1-1 > hint ffmpeg/4:0.6.1-5 soundtouch/1.5.0-4 gst-plugins-bad0.10/0.10.19-2.1 > Test run result at http://release.debian.org/~jcristau/britney/update_output.txt Cheers, Julien ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#614726: FFmpeg 0.6 transition
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 12:39:19 (CET), Julien Cristau wrote: > the ffmpeg transition got entangled with soundtouch (libsoundtouch1c2 → > libsoundtouch0), vtk (5.4 → 5.6), and now with gdal (through > openscenegraph). While soundtouch is close to ready, a number of vtk's > reverse deps FTBFS, and afaik gdal has barely started, so I'm looking at > separating these out. > > So I'm thinking of temporarily keeping libavutil49 in testing, with > something like this: > > diff --git a/britney b/britney > index 3069203..1fc7d33 100755 > --- a/britney > +++ b/britney > @@ -137,6 +137,10 @@ pkg_lists () { >for di_pkg_file in > $suite_dir/{main,contrib,non-free}/debian-installer/binary-$arch/Packages.gz; > do >test -f $di_pkg_file && zcat $di_pkg_file | dedupe_pkg_list > >>$1/$suite/Packages_$arch >done > + # XXX ugly hack, close your eyes. > + if [ -f $FTP_MIRROR/dists/testing/main/binary-$arch/Packages.gz ]; > then > + zcat $FTP_MIRROR/dists/testing/main/binary-$arch/Packages.gz | > grep-dctrl -FPackage libavutil49 -a -X -FSource ffmpeg | sed -e > 's/^Source:.*/Source: ffmpeg0.5/' >>$1/$suite/Packages_$arch > + fi >done >done >$FAUXPKG_SCRIPT generate $1/testing $1/unstable Well, TBH, it doesn't look that bad to me. > I'm hoping since libavutil has versioned symbols having two versions in > testing for a little while won't be too much of a problem. In fact, I already tested this. Loading both libavutil49 and libavutil50 into the same process works fine. > A test run with the following set of hints looks like it would work, > once the missing builds for audacity and gst-plugins-bad0.10 are in: > > urgent amide/0.9.2-1.1 > urgent soundtouch/1.5.0-4 > urgent portaudio19/19+svn20101113-3 > urgent pcre3/8.12-3 > urgent zoneminder/1.24.2-9 > urgent audacity/1.3.12-14 > urgent gst-plugins-bad0.10/0.10.19-2.1 > # link ocaml and ffmpeg transitions, not good > remove liquidsoap/0.9.2-3 ocaml-soundtouch/0.1.5-1 liq-contrib/08.11-1 > # ftbfs on armel, unmaintained (#598933) > remove ktoon/0.8.1-4.1 > # ftbfs (#615563) > remove cherokee/1.0.8-5 > # ftbfs (#615654) > remove ihu/0.6.0-2 > # obsolete binary needs decrufting > force soundtouch/1.5.0-4 > > hint ffmpeg/4:0.6.1-5 soundtouch/1.5.0-4 gst-plugins-bad0.10/0.10.19-2.1 > > Thoughts? I didn't check if that is all what's required, but the approach looks very promising to me. In particular, I miss libavg in the list above. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#614726: FFmpeg 0.6 transition
Hi, the ffmpeg transition got entangled with soundtouch (libsoundtouch1c2 → libsoundtouch0), vtk (5.4 → 5.6), and now with gdal (through openscenegraph). While soundtouch is close to ready, a number of vtk's reverse deps FTBFS, and afaik gdal has barely started, so I'm looking at separating these out. So I'm thinking of temporarily keeping libavutil49 in testing, with something like this: diff --git a/britney b/britney index 3069203..1fc7d33 100755 --- a/britney +++ b/britney @@ -137,6 +137,10 @@ pkg_lists () { for di_pkg_file in $suite_dir/{main,contrib,non-free}/debian-installer/binary-$arch/Packages.gz; do test -f $di_pkg_file && zcat $di_pkg_file | dedupe_pkg_list >>$1/$suite/Packages_$arch done + # XXX ugly hack, close your eyes. + if [ -f $FTP_MIRROR/dists/testing/main/binary-$arch/Packages.gz ]; then + zcat $FTP_MIRROR/dists/testing/main/binary-$arch/Packages.gz | grep-dctrl -FPackage libavutil49 -a -X -FSource ffmpeg | sed -e 's/^Source:.*/Source: ffmpeg0.5/' >>$1/$suite/Packages_$arch + fi done done $FAUXPKG_SCRIPT generate $1/testing $1/unstable I'm hoping since libavutil has versioned symbols having two versions in testing for a little while won't be too much of a problem. A test run with the following set of hints looks like it would work, once the missing builds for audacity and gst-plugins-bad0.10 are in: urgent amide/0.9.2-1.1 urgent soundtouch/1.5.0-4 urgent portaudio19/19+svn20101113-3 urgent pcre3/8.12-3 urgent zoneminder/1.24.2-9 urgent audacity/1.3.12-14 urgent gst-plugins-bad0.10/0.10.19-2.1 # link ocaml and ffmpeg transitions, not good remove liquidsoap/0.9.2-3 ocaml-soundtouch/0.1.5-1 liq-contrib/08.11-1 # ftbfs on armel, unmaintained (#598933) remove ktoon/0.8.1-4.1 # ftbfs (#615563) remove cherokee/1.0.8-5 # ftbfs (#615654) remove ihu/0.6.0-2 # obsolete binary needs decrufting force soundtouch/1.5.0-4 hint ffmpeg/4:0.6.1-5 soundtouch/1.5.0-4 gst-plugins-bad0.10/0.10.19-2.1 Thoughts? Cheers, Julien ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: FFmpeg 0.6 transition
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 21:12 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [debian-devel dropped from Cc as it didn't seem relevant to the mail] > > On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 12:06 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > It is here: http://release.debian.org/transitions/ffmpeg.html > > > > AFAIUI all packages marked red in the list above need to be rebuilt > > (i.e., binNMUed). > > I've scheduled an initial set of packages on most architectures (not > alpha, hppa or mips due to the size of their queues); let's see how that > goes. > > For reference, I've explicitly /not/ scheduled cherokee (#612482) or > libavg (#580678). So, a status update. We've now scheduled binNMUs for all the reverse dependencies other than those with pre-existing FTBFS issues; ignoring packages where we're just waiting for mips, the current issues are: * amide - FTBFS (no-add-needed, #614725) [ * blender, dvswitch - waiting for cmake ] * cherokee - RC-buggy and FTBFS (#612482); looking like a removal candidate * elmerfem - FTBFS (no-add-needed, #614952) * ffmpeg2theora - FTBFS (no-add-needed, #614996) * freej - FTBFS (#614458) * gdcm - FTBFS (no-add-needed, #614953) * kino - FTBFS (no-add-needed, #614954) * ktoon - FTBFS (#614446) [ * libavg - FTBFS (#580678); not in testing ] * libvalhalla - FTBFS due to build-dependency issues (#614989) * mediatomb - FTBFS (no-add-needed, #614956) * openmovieeditor - FTBFS (no-add-needed, #614957) * openscenegraph - FTBFS (#614467) * qutecom - not getting built on armel due to a dependency chain that ends up in the rasqal ickiness * smilutils - FTBFS (no-add-needed, #614958) * xine-lib - FTBFS due to X changes (#610635) Regards, Adam ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#614726: FFmpeg 0.6 transition
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 14:29:33 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Hi, > > First of all, congratulations on the release! > > FYI: I just accepted mehdis offer from debconf 10 to upload ffmpeg just > after the squeeze release. I've got a lot of pings and flames that this > wasn't included in squeeze, we discussed this to death in NYC, and > therefore just went ahead. > Filing as a bug so I can mark blockers. Cheers, Julien ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: FFmpeg 0.6 transition
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 22:21 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 17.02.2011, 21:12 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > > I've scheduled an initial set of packages on most architectures (not > > alpha, hppa or mips due to the size of their queues); let's see how that > > goes. [...] > You don't need to binNMU audacity, because I just uploaded 1.3.12-11. Thanks for letting us know. Sadly I started at the top of the alphabetically sorted list; the audacity binNMUs have already built on three architectures. Regards, Adam ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: FFmpeg 0.6 transition
Am Donnerstag, den 17.02.2011, 21:12 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > [debian-devel dropped from Cc as it didn't seem relevant to the mail] > > On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 12:06 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > On Di, Feb 15, 2011 at 09:31:33 (CET), Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > > > > BTW, where has mehdi's excellent transition tracker gone? > > > > It is here: http://release.debian.org/transitions/ffmpeg.html > > > > AFAIUI all packages marked red in the list above need to be rebuilt > > (i.e., binNMUed). > > I've scheduled an initial set of packages on most architectures (not > alpha, hppa or mips due to the size of their queues); let's see how that > goes. > > For reference, I've explicitly /not/ scheduled cherokee (#612482) or > libavg (#580678). You don't need to binNMU audacity, because I just uploaded 1.3.12-11. -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: FFmpeg 0.6 transition
[debian-devel dropped from Cc as it didn't seem relevant to the mail] On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 12:06 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Di, Feb 15, 2011 at 09:31:33 (CET), Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > > BTW, where has mehdi's excellent transition tracker gone? > > It is here: http://release.debian.org/transitions/ffmpeg.html > > AFAIUI all packages marked red in the list above need to be rebuilt > (i.e., binNMUed). I've scheduled an initial set of packages on most architectures (not alpha, hppa or mips due to the size of their queues); let's see how that goes. For reference, I've explicitly /not/ scheduled cherokee (#612482) or libavg (#580678). Regards, Adam ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: FFmpeg 0.6 transition
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.release as well. On Di, Feb 15, 2011 at 09:31:33 (CET), Reinhard Tartler wrote: > BTW, where has mehdi's excellent transition tracker gone? It is here: http://release.debian.org/transitions/ffmpeg.html AFAIUI all packages marked red in the list above need to be rebuilt (i.e., binNMUed). -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: FFmpeg 0.6 transition
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.release,gmane.linux.debian.alioth.multimedia-maintainers as well. On So, Feb 06, 2011 at 14:29:33 (CET), Reinhard Tartler wrote: > FYI: I just accepted mehdis offer from debconf 10 to upload ffmpeg just > after the squeeze release. I've got a lot of pings and flames that this > wasn't included in squeeze, we discussed this to death in NYC, and > therefore just went ahead. Okay, FFmpeg 0.6 has now built on all architectures and is AFAIUI by itself ready for wheezy. For successful migration, I'd suggest to binNMU the following packages, which is a list of source packages, which produce a binary package that depends on libavutil49 (superseeded by libavutil50): amide aqualung audacious-plugins audacity avbin blender cherokee dvswitch electricsheep elmerfem ffmpeg ffmpeg2theora ffprobe forked-daapd freej gdcm gnash imageshack-uploader k3b kino ktoon kwwidgets libavg libphash libvalhalla lynkeos.app mediatomb mlt moon motion mpd mrpt netgen opencv openmovieeditor openscenegraph paraview performous qmmp qutecom smilutils taoframework unicap vtk vtkedge xine-lib xine-lib-1.2 (experimental only) zoneminder BTW, where has mehdi's excellent transition tracker gone? -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: FFmpeg 0.6 transition
Am Sonntag, den 06.02.2011, 14:29 +0100 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: > FYI: I just accepted mehdis offer from debconf 10 to upload ffmpeg just > after the squeeze release. I've got a lot of pings and flames that this > wasn't included in squeeze, we discussed this to death in NYC, and > therefore just went ahead. > > The following source packages are affected by this upload: > [...] You forgot audacity in this list. I will do an upload containing other changes too. > Most of them should be dealt with a binNMU, but for some (mplayer, vlc, > etc.) new upstream releases are already in the pipe. I'd suggest to wait > a few days before firing binNMUs. I would like to upload vlc from experimental to unstable, but this depends on iceweasel 3.6, which is in experimental. -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
FFmpeg 0.6 transition
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.release as well. Hi, First of all, congratulations on the release! FYI: I just accepted mehdis offer from debconf 10 to upload ffmpeg just after the squeeze release. I've got a lot of pings and flames that this wasn't included in squeeze, we discussed this to death in NYC, and therefore just went ahead. The following source packages are affected by this upload: alsa-plugins namide avbin cherokee dvswitch elmerfem ffmpeg-php ffmpeg2theora ffmpegthumbnailer ffms2 ffprobe forked-daapd freej gdcm gimp-gap gmerlin-avdecoder gmerlin-encoders gmic gnash gnusound gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg guvcview idjc igstk imageshack-uploader iulib kdenlive kino ktoon kwwidgets libavg libphash libquicktime libvalhalla lightspark linphone lynkeos.app moc moon motion mpd mplayer mt-daapd netgen opencv openmovieeditor openscenegraph paraview performous picard potamus qmmp qutecom renpy smilutils sox synfig taoframework unicap vlc vtk xine-lib xine-lib-1.2 xjadeo xmms2 zoneminder Most of them should be dealt with a binNMU, but for some (mplayer, vlc, etc.) new upstream releases are already in the pipe. I'd suggest to wait a few days before firing binNMUs. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers