On 2011-02-02 22:35, Miguel Colon wrote:
So looks like a transition to me, and we probably need to readjust
ardour's build dependency (to libsoundtouch-dev). I can take care of
this if agreed upon.
Hello, yes it's a transition I was the one that made renamed it.
Perhaps Alessio wants to
Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev, but
this is not built by the archive as soundtouch provides
libsoundtouch-dev but not libsoundtouch1-dev. Is this just a typo in
soundtouch packaging, or do we have a more serious problem?
--
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:54:37PM +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev, but
this is not built by the archive as soundtouch provides
libsoundtouch-dev but not libsoundtouch1-dev. Is this just a typo in
soundtouch packaging, or
Am Mittwoch, den 02.02.2011, 15:23 +0100 schrieb Adrian Knoth:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:54:37PM +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev, but
this is not built by the archive as soundtouch provides
libsoundtouch-dev but not
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 04:10:51PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/soundtouch/news/20110116T154758Z.html
says:
* Rename libsoundtouch1c2 to libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch1-dev to
libsoundtouch0-dev so we comply with policy.
- Obsolete c2
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 04:10:51PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 02.02.2011, 15:23 +0100 schrieb Adrian Knoth:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:54:37PM +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev,
but this is not built by the
So looks like a transition to me, and we probably need to readjust
ardour's build dependency (to libsoundtouch-dev). I can take care of
this if agreed upon.
Hello, yes it's a transition I was the one that made renamed it.
Perhaps Alessio wants to provide further clarification.
Last time I
