Re: Linking rtmpdump frontends against the shared lib

2010-07-08 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 08.07.2010 13:43, schrieb Fabian Greffrath: Or is it PROGS instead of $(PROGS)? To answer my question: No, it's not. ;) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/m

Re: Linking rtmpdump frontends against the shared lib

2010-07-08 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 08.07.2010 13:12, schrieb Howard Chu: Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 08.07.2010 12:54, schrieb Fabian Greffrath: Thank you very much. I'll integrate this one into our package. In the Makefile there is still one s/progs/$(PROGS)/ required for the install rule to work. Thanks, fixed. Or is it

Re: Linking rtmpdump frontends against the shared lib

2010-07-08 Thread Howard Chu
Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 08.07.2010 12:54, schrieb Fabian Greffrath: Thank you very much. I'll integrate this one into our package. In the Makefile there is still one s/progs/$(PROGS)/ required for the install rule to work. Thanks, fixed. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. ht

Re: Linking rtmpdump frontends against the shared lib

2010-07-08 Thread Howard Chu
Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 08.07.2010 12:45, schrieb Howard Chu: It does. Go re-read the make documentation. Dependencies for a target are all considered as a unit, no matter how many lines you split them onto. Sorry, I am wrong, you are right. Heh. Well, I'm a co-author of GNU Make after al

Re: Linking rtmpdump frontends against the shared lib

2010-07-08 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 08.07.2010 12:54, schrieb Fabian Greffrath: Thank you very much. I'll integrate this one into our package. In the Makefile there is still one s/progs/$(PROGS)/ required for the install rule to work. - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mail

Re: Linking rtmpdump frontends against the shared lib

2010-07-08 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 08.07.2010 12:45, schrieb Howard Chu: It does. Go re-read the make documentation. Dependencies for a target are all considered as a unit, no matter how many lines you split them onto. Sorry, I am wrong, you are right. Just after I pressed the "Send" button I realized I should google for "g

Re: Linking rtmpdump frontends against the shared lib

2010-07-08 Thread Howard Chu
Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 08.07.2010 12:33, schrieb Howard Chu: This patch doesn't do what you want; it links both the static and the shared library into each executable. No, it doesn't, please have another look. I have put all references to $(LIBRTMP) for all executables on separate lines, s

Re: Linking rtmpdump frontends against the shared lib

2010-07-08 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 08.07.2010 12:33, schrieb Howard Chu: This patch doesn't do what you want; it links both the static and the shared library into each executable. No, it doesn't, please have another look. I have put all references to $(LIBRTMP) for all executables on separate lines, so $^ does just substitu

Re: Linking rtmpdump frontends against the shared lib

2010-07-08 Thread Howard Chu
Fabian Greffrath wrote: Dear Howard, I have added a patch to the rtmpdump Debian package that makes the frontends link against the shared lib instead of static linking: My rationale is to a

Linking rtmpdump frontends against the shared lib

2010-07-08 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Dear Howard, I have added a patch to the rtmpdump Debian package that makes the frontends link against the shared lib instead of static linking: My rationale is to avoid code duplication i