Re: PackagingWithGit wiki update?
On Fr, Jan 08, 2010 at 14:14:28 (CET), Andreas Marschke wrote: > Am Freitag 08 Januar 2010 13:36:19 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš: >> > Od: Reinhard Tartler >> >> Hi Reinhard, >> >> > Does coupling git-buildpacage with pbuilder really make things easier? >> > I think this is unnecessarily confusing. Isn't it easier to first create >> > a soruce package with 'git-buildpackage -S' and run pbuilder on the >> > resulting package? >> >> Trying your way and having some errors here: >> $ git-buildpackage -S >> [snip] >> debuild: fatal error at line 1251: >> running debsign failed >> debuild -i -I returned 29 >> Couldn't run 'debuild -i -I -S' > Hi, > > I think you might want git-buildpackage -S --git-keyid=? or configure ~/.devscripts to pass '-us -uc' to debuild by default. There is a well commented template in /etc/devscripts.conf, btw. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: PackagingWithGit wiki update?
> Od: Andreas Marschke > I think you might want git-buildpackage -S --git-keyid=? I don't have a key so it is probably better to avoid debuild trying to sign the package as Reinhard suggested.. thank you mira ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: PackagingWithGit wiki update?
> Od: Reinhard Tartler Hi Reinhard, > >> Does coupling git-buildpacage with pbuilder really make things easier? > >> I think this is unnecessarily confusing. Isn't it easier to first create > >> a soruce package with 'git-buildpackage -S' and run pbuilder on the > >> resulting package? Your way is easer ... Thank you for help regards mira ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: PackagingWithGit wiki update?
Am Freitag 08 Januar 2010 13:36:19 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš: > > Od: Reinhard Tartler > > Hi Reinhard, > > > Does coupling git-buildpacage with pbuilder really make things easier? > > I think this is unnecessarily confusing. Isn't it easier to first create > > a soruce package with 'git-buildpackage -S' and run pbuilder on the > > resulting package? > > Trying your way and having some errors here: > $ git-buildpackage -S > [snip] > debuild: fatal error at line 1251: > running debsign failed > debuild -i -I returned 29 > Couldn't run 'debuild -i -I -S' Hi, I think you might want git-buildpackage -S --git-keyid=? Cheers, Andreas Marschke. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: PackagingWithGit wiki update?
2010/1/8 Reinhard Tartler : > Does coupling git-buildpacage with pbuilder really make things easier? > I think this is unnecessarily confusing. Isn't it easier to first create > a soruce package with 'git-buildpackage -S' and run pbuilder on the > resulting package? I do use debuild and pdebuild directly from git-buildpackage. I keep editing my ~/.gbp.conf depending what stage of packaging i'm in (debuild at first then pdebuild to check) For pdebuild I have the wrapper script that comes from the gbp documentation. -- Xtophe ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: PackagingWithGit wiki update?
On Fr, Jan 08, 2010 at 13:36:19 (CET), Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> Od: Reinhard Tartler > > Hi Reinhard, > >> Does coupling git-buildpacage with pbuilder really make things easier? >> I think this is unnecessarily confusing. Isn't it easier to first create >> a soruce package with 'git-buildpackage -S' and run pbuilder on the >> resulting package? > > Trying your way and having some errors here: > $ git-buildpackage -S > [snip] > debuild: fatal error at line 1251: > running debsign failed > debuild -i -I returned 29 > Couldn't run 'debuild -i -I -S' > > Should I edit /etc/git-buildpackage/gbp.conf file anyway? > Something like "sign-tags = False" look at the error message more closely. debuild complains here, not git-buildpackage. You can either use the parameters -uc -us to avoid debuild trying to sign the package, or set the following to your ~/.devscripts file: DEBUILD_DPKG_BUILDPACKAGE_OPTS="-us -uc -i" I'd suggest copying /etc/devscripts.conf to ~/.devscripts to have a template and go through the various, well commented options. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: PackagingWithGit wiki update?
> Od: Reinhard Tartler Hi Reinhard, > Does coupling git-buildpacage with pbuilder really make things easier? > I think this is unnecessarily confusing. Isn't it easier to first create > a soruce package with 'git-buildpackage -S' and run pbuilder on the > resulting package? Trying your way and having some errors here: $ git-buildpackage -S [snip] debuild: fatal error at line 1251: running debsign failed debuild -i -I returned 29 Couldn't run 'debuild -i -I -S' Should I edit /etc/git-buildpackage/gbp.conf file anyway? Something like "sign-tags = False" regards mira ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: PackagingWithGit wiki update?
On Fr, Jan 08, 2010 at 12:13:02 (CET), Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hi, > > I just switching from pbuilder to git -buildpackage and I found few pbuilder has a very different purpose to git-buildpackage. Mentioning them together is just confusing. > things which could be improved on PackagingWithGit wiki. > http://wiki.debian.org/PackagingWithGit That wiki page is not maintained by the pkg-multimedia team. In fact, it seems that not a single member of our team has ever touched this page. Perhaps you should discuss this with the previous authors of that page? Still, I find the page well written and understandable. We should point from our wiki pages to there. > 1) section pbuilder > # cp /usr/share/doc/git-buildpackage/examples/git-pbuilder > /usr/local/bin/ > > *git-pbuilder file changed name to gbp-pbuilder > *should it be copied to /usr/local/bin/ or rather to /usr/bin/ ? > > 2) same section > I suggesting to put here also some recommended > /etc/git-buildpackage/gbp.conf file > e.g. > builder = /usr/bin/gbp-pbuilder > cleaner = fakeroot debian/rules clean > pristine-tar = True Does coupling git-buildpacage with pbuilder really make things easier? I think this is unnecessarily confusing. Isn't it easier to first create a soruce package with 'git-buildpackage -S' and run pbuilder on the resulting package? -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
PackagingWithGit wiki update?
Hi, I just switching from pbuilder to git -buildpackage and I found few things which could be improved on PackagingWithGit wiki. http://wiki.debian.org/PackagingWithGit 1) section pbuilder # cp /usr/share/doc/git-buildpackage/examples/git-pbuilder /usr/local/bin/ *git-pbuilder file changed name to gbp-pbuilder *should it be copied to /usr/local/bin/ or rather to /usr/bin/ ? 2) same section I suggesting to put here also some recommended /etc/git-buildpackage/gbp.conf file e.g. builder = /usr/bin/gbp-pbuilder cleaner = fakeroot debian/rules clean pristine-tar = True any others? regards mira ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
