Hi, All.
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 16:50, robert robert.hegem...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 09.05.2011, 00:03 Uhr, schrieb bouvi...@mp3-tech.org:
It seems that it was actually a mistake. I've been confused by the
library vs lesser naming, and did not noticed then that lesser was
only the v2.1 name.
2011/5/11 Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br:
Hi, All.
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 16:50, robert robert.hegem...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 09.05.2011, 00:03 Uhr, schrieb bouvi...@mp3-tech.org:
It seems that it was actually a mistake. I've been confused by the
library vs lesser naming, and did not noticed
Am 06.05.2011, 22:52 Uhr, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk:
There is either GNU Library General Public License version 2.0 or GNU
Lesser General Public License version 2.1.
It looks like Gabriel replaced 'Library' by 'Lesser' 3 years and 9 months
ago, I'm sure he had some reason for
Am 06.05.2011, 23:31 Uhr, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk:
On 11-05-06 at 04:55pm, Andres Mejia wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On 11-05-06 at 04:31pm, Andres Mejia wrote:
+This library is free software; you can redistribute it
Humm, apparently, something in the way ate your patch and I didn't receive
it.
On May 06 2011, Andres Mejia wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On 11-05-06 at 04:31pm, Andres Mejia wrote:
+ This library is free software; you can
On Friday 06 May 2011 5:50:59 pm Rogério Brito wrote:
Humm, apparently, something in the way ate your patch and I didn't receive
it.
Here it is again inline.
Description: Patch to simply print LGPL licence header when using lame --license
--- lame-3.98.4.orig/frontend/parse.c
+++
