Re: [SCM] libmms/squeeze: Apply another patch backported from upstream git to fixup bswap.h macros. This patch does not change anything functionally, but it does make the code read correctly.

2011-02-22 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:43, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 22.02.2011 08:49, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: >> >> Makes sense, > > and so it's done ;) In csound, I number patches according to the following scheme: 0xxx: Patches taken from upstream development 1xxx: Patches interesting for upstream (

Re: [SCM] libmms/squeeze: Apply another patch backported from upstream git to fixup bswap.h macros. This patch does not change anything functionally, but it does make the code read correctly.

2011-02-22 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 22.02.2011 08:49, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: Makes sense, and so it's done ;) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: [SCM] libmms/squeeze: Apply another patch backported from upstream git to fixup bswap.h macros. This patch does not change anything functionally, but it does make the code read correctly.

2011-02-21 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:30:14 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 21.02.2011 17:21, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: >> I'd suggest to drop them. the order is defined by debian/patches/series >> anyway > > Generally I agree with you. But for the sake of the smallest possible > debdiff with the version

Re: [SCM] libmms/squeeze: Apply another patch backported from upstream git to fixup bswap.h macros. This patch does not change anything functionally, but it does make the code read correctly.

2011-02-21 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 21.02.2011 17:21, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: I'd suggest to drop them. the order is defined by debian/patches/series anyway Generally I agree with you. But for the sake of the smallest possible debdiff with the version currently in stable, I think I should keep the numbering of the present

Re: [SCM] libmms/squeeze: Apply another patch backported from upstream git to fixup bswap.h macros. This patch does not change anything functionally, but it does make the code read correctly.

2011-02-21 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 16:47:38 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 21.02.2011 16:37, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: >> the numbering looks very weird. Fabian, is that on purpose? perhaps we >> should remove the numbers from the filenames before the next upload? > > Yes, I admit it's weird. No, it's n

Re: [SCM] libmms/squeeze: Apply another patch backported from upstream git to fixup bswap.h macros. This patch does not change anything functionally, but it does make the code read correctly.

2011-02-21 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 21.02.2011 16:37, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: the numbering looks very weird. Fabian, is that on purpose? perhaps we should remove the numbers from the filenames before the next upload? Yes, I admit it's weird. No, it's not on purpose. ;) It is because each time I backported a patch from upst

Re: [SCM] libmms/squeeze: Apply another patch backported from upstream git to fixup bswap.h macros. This patch does not change anything functionally, but it does make the code read correctly.

2011-02-21 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 15:25:48 (CET), fabian-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: > diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series > index f086ba3..8e6f538 100644 > --- a/debian/patches/series > +++ b/debian/patches/series > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ > 0001-Remove-unneeded-bswap.h-from-publi