Re: [SCM] mma packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.7, created. upstream/1.7

2011-02-02 Thread Miguel Colon
Hello: Assuming you did a gbp-pull and git-buildpackage is configured correctly it should work. Also when I created the missing tag a while ago I confirmed that upstream/1.7 contain the correct source when compared to a tarball I downloaded from upstream and I also merged upstream/1.7 to master

Re: [SCM] mma packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.7, created. upstream/1.7

2011-02-02 Thread Joel Roth
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 08:09:44AM +, Miguel Colon wrote: Hello: Assuming you did a gbp-pull and git-buildpackage is configured correctly it should work. Also when I created the missing tag a while ago I confirmed that upstream/1.7 contain the correct source when compared to a tarball I

Re: [SCM] mma packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.7, created. upstream/1.7

2011-02-02 Thread Miguel Colon
Hello: That should work. Try to pull the commit I just made to make sure. It should complain at dh_installchangelogs now. Cheers, Miguel On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Joel Roth jo...@pobox.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 08:09:44AM +, Miguel Colon wrote: Hello: Assuming you did a

Re: [SCM] mma packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.7, created. upstream/1.7

2011-02-02 Thread Joel Roth
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:45:50AM +, Miguel Colon wrote: Hello: That should work. Try to pull the commit I just made to make sure. It should complain at dh_installchangelogs now. Great. It goes much further. A few lintian warnings remain. W: mma source: changelog-should-mention-nmu

Re: [SCM] mma packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.7, created. upstream/1.7

2011-02-02 Thread Miguel Colon
Hello: Sure, I fixed a few things since I only planned to make 1 commit but made a mistake since I forgot about the dh_install limitations. Anyway since you seem to be doing well on your own now I was gonna leave it at this but I noticed that you added a new manpage on the source. When using

Re: [SCM] mma packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.7, created. upstream/1.7

2011-02-01 Thread Joel Roth
Michael and others, I wonder if I made a mistake in merging the upstream version. When I try building this package, I get a huge raft of errors. Could someone see if these are common or readily solved? thanks, Joel -- Joel Roth ___