Re: [SCM] mma packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.7, created. upstream/1.7

2011-02-02 Thread Miguel Colon
Hello:

Assuming you did a gbp-pull and git-buildpackage is configured
correctly it should work. Also when I created the missing tag a while
ago I confirmed that upstream/1.7 contain the correct source when
compared to a tarball I downloaded from upstream and I also merged
upstream/1.7 to master and verified that everything was peachy. So the
git in alioth should be fine. Try doing a gbp-pull or cloning it
again.

You will get build errors during dh_install since files got renamed. I
could fix them but not sure if you already fixed it all.

Cheers,
Miguel

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Joel Roth jo...@pobox.com wrote:
 Michael and others,

 I wonder if I made a mistake in merging the upstream
 version.

 When I try building this package, I get a huge raft
 of errors.

 Could someone see if these are common or readily solved?

 thanks,

 Joel



 --
 Joel Roth

 ___
 pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
 pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: [SCM] mma packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.7, created. upstream/1.7

2011-02-02 Thread Joel Roth
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 08:09:44AM +, Miguel Colon wrote:
 Hello:
 
 Assuming you did a gbp-pull and git-buildpackage is configured
 correctly it should work. Also when I created the missing tag a while
 ago I confirmed that upstream/1.7 contain the correct source when
 compared to a tarball I downloaded from upstream and I also merged
 upstream/1.7 to master and verified that everything was peachy. So the
 git in alioth should be fine. Try doing a gbp-pull or cloning it
 again.
 
 You will get build errors during dh_install since files got renamed. I
 could fix them but not sure if you already fixed it all.

Thanks Miguel,

Looks better. With git-buildpackage, I now get as
far as dh_install:

dh_installdirs
dh_install
cp: cannot stat `./mma': No such file or directory


The following line in mma.install appears to be at fault.

mma usr/bin

The executable is actally called mma.py. I'd like to
do this:

mma.py usr/bin/mma

But according to 'man dh_install' the destination must be
a directory.
   
Any suggestions?

thanks again,

Joel



-- 
Joel Roth

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: [SCM] mma packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.7, created. upstream/1.7

2011-02-02 Thread Miguel Colon
Hello:

That should work. Try to pull the commit I just made to make sure.

It should complain at dh_installchangelogs now.

Cheers,
Miguel

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Joel Roth jo...@pobox.com wrote:
 On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 08:09:44AM +, Miguel Colon wrote:
 Hello:

 Assuming you did a gbp-pull and git-buildpackage is configured
 correctly it should work. Also when I created the missing tag a while
 ago I confirmed that upstream/1.7 contain the correct source when
 compared to a tarball I downloaded from upstream and I also merged
 upstream/1.7 to master and verified that everything was peachy. So the
 git in alioth should be fine. Try doing a gbp-pull or cloning it
 again.

 You will get build errors during dh_install since files got renamed. I
 could fix them but not sure if you already fixed it all.

 Thanks Miguel,

 Looks better. With git-buildpackage, I now get as
 far as dh_install:

        dh_installdirs
        dh_install
        cp: cannot stat `./mma': No such file or directory


 The following line in mma.install appears to be at fault.

    mma usr/bin

 The executable is actally called mma.py. I'd like to
 do this:

    mma.py usr/bin/mma

 But according to 'man dh_install' the destination must be
 a directory.

 Any suggestions?

 thanks again,

 Joel



 --
 Joel Roth

 ___
 pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
 pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: [SCM] mma packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.7, created. upstream/1.7

2011-02-02 Thread Joel Roth
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:45:50AM +, Miguel Colon wrote:
 Hello:
 
 That should work. Try to pull the commit I just made to make sure.
 
 It should complain at dh_installchangelogs now.


Great. It goes much further. A few lintian warnings remain.

W: mma source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
W: mma source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.7-1
W: mma source: no-human-maintainers
W: mma source: ancient-standards-version 3.7.3 (current is 3.9.1)
W: mma: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/mma-gb

Will study the patches you made.

Regards,

Joel


 
 Cheers,
 Miguel
-- 
Joel Roth

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: [SCM] mma packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.7, created. upstream/1.7

2011-02-02 Thread Miguel Colon
Hello:

Sure, I fixed a few things since I only planned to make 1 commit but
made a mistake since I forgot about the dh_install limitations.

Anyway since you seem to be doing well on your own now I was gonna
leave it at this but I noticed that you added a new manpage on the
source. When using quilt (3.0) all the changes should be done inside
the debian folder and the source left untouched. You should revert the
commit that adds docs/man/mma-gb.1 and add it as a patch in
debian/patches that creates this file and (if applicable) report it
upstream (this link should give you some info:
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/) . At this point you will probably
also want to add a .gitignore file to ignore the .pc folder.

Cheers,
Miguel

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Joel Roth jo...@pobox.com wrote:
 On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:45:50AM +, Miguel Colon wrote:
 Hello:

 That should work. Try to pull the commit I just made to make sure.

 It should complain at dh_installchangelogs now.


 Great. It goes much further. A few lintian warnings remain.

 W: mma source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
 W: mma source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.7-1
 W: mma source: no-human-maintainers
 W: mma source: ancient-standards-version 3.7.3 (current is 3.9.1)
 W: mma: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/mma-gb

 Will study the patches you made.

 Regards,

 Joel



 Cheers,
 Miguel
 --
 Joel Roth

 ___
 pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
 pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: [SCM] mma packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.7, created. upstream/1.7

2011-02-01 Thread Joel Roth
Michael and others,

I wonder if I made a mistake in merging the upstream
version.

When I try building this package, I get a huge raft
of errors. 

Could someone see if these are common or readily solved?

thanks,

Joel



-- 
Joel Roth

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers