Re: [SCM] pd-pmpd packaging branch, master, updated. upstream/0.9-4-g86cd593
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 00:22:50 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Aug 22, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 08:18:24PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 21/08/10 18:00, eighthave-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit b50fc79d8a856062d9a05100dd83a7fca3bf696b Author: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org Date: Sat Aug 21 17:43:50 2010 -0400 added gitignore for clean git-status diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 000..3c2f99e --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +debian/files +debian/pd-pmpd.debhelper.log +debian/pd-pmpd.substvars +debian/pd-pmpd/ +*.o +*.pd_linux +.pc I can't think of any reason not to do this... but we don't seem to have this in any of our other packages (or at least, most). Any reason why we haven't done this before? I dislike silencing cruft, as in my packaging development routines cruft is a sign of something potentially forgotten or gone wrong: A normal packaging build and successive cleanup should leave no traces behind[1]. Sounds reasonable. I don't have a strong opinion, so I am happy to remove the .gitignore if you think I should. I think ignoring the .pc directory is okay. We also (have to) tolerate the existance of .git after all. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] pd-pmpd packaging branch, master, updated. upstream/0.9-4-g86cd593
On Aug 22, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 08:18:24PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 21/08/10 18:00, eighthave-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit b50fc79d8a856062d9a05100dd83a7fca3bf696b Author: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org Date: Sat Aug 21 17:43:50 2010 -0400 added gitignore for clean git-status diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 000..3c2f99e --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +debian/files +debian/pd-pmpd.debhelper.log +debian/pd-pmpd.substvars +debian/pd-pmpd/ +*.o +*.pd_linux +.pc I can't think of any reason not to do this... but we don't seem to have this in any of our other packages (or at least, most). Any reason why we haven't done this before? I dislike silencing cruft, as in my packaging development routines cruft is a sign of something potentially forgotten or gone wrong: A normal packaging build and successive cleanup should leave no traces behind[1]. Sounds reasonable. I don't have a strong opinion, so I am happy to remove the .gitignore if you think I should. .hc Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is related to the telescope. -Edsger Dykstra ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] pd-pmpd packaging branch, master, updated. upstream/0.9-4-g86cd593
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 08:18:24PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 21/08/10 18:00, eighthave-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit b50fc79d8a856062d9a05100dd83a7fca3bf696b Author: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org Date: Sat Aug 21 17:43:50 2010 -0400 added gitignore for clean git-status diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 000..3c2f99e --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +debian/files +debian/pd-pmpd.debhelper.log +debian/pd-pmpd.substvars +debian/pd-pmpd/ +*.o +*.pd_linux +.pc I can't think of any reason not to do this... but we don't seem to have this in any of our other packages (or at least, most). Any reason why we haven't done this before? I dislike silencing cruft, as in my packaging development routines cruft is a sign of something potentially forgotten or gone wrong: A normal packaging build and successive cleanup should leave no traces behind[1]. - Jonas [1] Currently this is not always true when using patches and dpkg source format 3.0 (quit). That is a special case, however, which hopefully will be resolved upstream in dpkg-source and/or git-buildpackage. Until then I personally work around it locally - I noticed that others hardcode workarounds in packaging. which I dislike but (until now) have silently ignored. -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] pd-pmpd packaging branch, master, updated. upstream/0.9-4-g86cd593
On 21/08/10 18:00, eighthave-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit b50fc79d8a856062d9a05100dd83a7fca3bf696b Author: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org Date: Sat Aug 21 17:43:50 2010 -0400 added gitignore for clean git-status diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 000..3c2f99e --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +debian/files +debian/pd-pmpd.debhelper.log +debian/pd-pmpd.substvars +debian/pd-pmpd/ +*.o +*.pd_linux +.pc I can't think of any reason not to do this... but we don't seem to have this in any of our other packages (or at least, most). Any reason why we haven't done this before? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
