Re: Bug#594093: NEON pass failure on ffmpeg

2010-09-13 Thread Loïc Minier
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
 the general idea is to start an upload with an 'dummy' debian/changelog
 entry indicating the next version, and finalize it using git-dch(1) just
 before the upload.

 Would you mind creating it with UNRELEASED as the target dist?  This
 helps dch figure out that it should add to the current changelog rather
 than increment the version in the changelog.

Thanks!
-- 
Loïc Minier

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Bug#594093: NEON pass failure on ffmpeg

2010-09-13 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Mo, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:28:32 (CEST), Loïc Minier wrote:

 On Fri, Aug 27, 2010, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
 the general idea is to start an upload with an 'dummy' debian/changelog
 entry indicating the next version, and finalize it using git-dch(1) just
 before the upload.

  Would you mind creating it with UNRELEASED as the target dist?  This
  helps dch figure out that it should add to the current changelog rather
  than increment the version in the changelog.

hm. this hides the upload target of upcoming upload. But if it helps
git-dch, it might make sense to communicate this via other means.

ok, I'll try with UNRELEASED.

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Bug#594093: NEON pass failure on ffmpeg

2010-08-27 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 01:42:17 (CEST), Loïc Minier wrote:

 On Thu, Aug 26, 2010, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
 For the base flavor, I totally agree. For the specialized neon flavor,
 I'm not sure if that's so important. But I have to admit that I'm really
 not an expert for armel, so I fully trust your judgement here.

  Actually my test logic was wrong; I realized when implementing the v7
  part I mentioned: if v7 isn't enabled by default, then the NEON pass
  should enable it since NEON implies v7.  v6t2 was a distraction, I
  removed it.

thanks!

  I committed this to ffmpeg git, but I didn't understand the way the
  changelog was maintained (apparently you create an entry after the last
  upload?).  Mind fixing it up?

I've just fixed it up.

the general idea is to start an upload with an 'dummy' debian/changelog
entry indicating the next version, and finalize it using git-dch(1) just
before the upload.

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Processed: Re: Bug#594093: NEON pass failure on ffmpeg

2010-08-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 clone 594093 -1
Bug#594093: mplayer: wrong byteorder on 16-bit displays with -vo x11 (-vo sdl 
works)?
Bug 594093 cloned as bug 594417.

 reassign -1 src:ffmpeg
Bug #594417 [mplayer] mplayer: wrong byteorder on 16-bit displays with -vo x11 
(-vo sdl works)?
Bug reassigned from package 'mplayer' to 'src:ffmpeg'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions mplayer/2:1.0~rc3+svn20100502-3.
 found -1 4:0.6-1
Bug #594417 [src:ffmpeg] mplayer: wrong byteorder on 16-bit displays with -vo 
x11 (-vo sdl works)?
Bug Marked as found in versions ffmpeg/4:0.6-1.
 severity -1 important
Bug #594417 [src:ffmpeg] mplayer: wrong byteorder on 16-bit displays with -vo 
x11 (-vo sdl works)?
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'

 retitle -1 FTBFS/armel: neon flavor requires 'ubfx' instruction
Bug #594417 [src:ffmpeg] mplayer: wrong byteorder on 16-bit displays with -vo 
x11 (-vo sdl works)?
Changed Bug title to 'FTBFS/armel: neon flavor requires 'ubfx' instruction' 
from 'mplayer: wrong byteorder on 16-bit displays with -vo x11 (-vo sdl works)?'
 reassign 594093 mplayer
Bug #594093 [mplayer] mplayer: wrong byteorder on 16-bit displays with -vo x11 
(-vo sdl works)?
Ignoring request to reassign bug #594093 to the same package
 fixed 594093 2:1.0~rc4~try1.dsfg1-1
Bug #594093 [mplayer] mplayer: wrong byteorder on 16-bit displays with -vo x11 
(-vo sdl works)?
Bug Marked as fixed in versions mplayer/2:1.0~rc4~try1.dsfg1-1.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
594093: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594093
594417: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594417
-1: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=-1
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers