Re: Introducing symbol versioning in FFmpeg

2010-01-30 Thread Luk Claes
Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Mi, Jan 27, 2010 at 19:52:35 (CET), Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 07:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>> http://release.debian.org/~adsb/ffmpeg_binNMUs.txt is what I believe to >>> be the list of packages potentially needing binNMUs. >>> >>> Exclud

Re: Introducing symbol versioning in FFmpeg

2010-01-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 07:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > http://release.debian.org/~adsb/ffmpeg_binNMUs.txt is what I believe to > be the list of packages potentially needing binNMUs. > > Excluding those packages which have either had sourceful uploads in the > past day or so (e.g. vtk) or have

Re: Introducing symbol versioning in FFmpeg

2010-01-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 07:57 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Mo, Dez 21, 2009 at 23:17:42 (CET), Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Please go ahead with the uploads introducing symbol versioning. In > > order to ease transition, we'll schedule the required binNMUs once the > > package has migrated t

Re: Introducing symbol versioning in FFmpeg

2010-01-25 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Mo, Dez 21, 2009 at 23:17:42 (CET), Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Please go ahead with the uploads introducing symbol versioning. In > order to ease transition, we'll schedule the required binNMUs once the > package has migrated to testing. While ffmpeg not migrated to testing yet (will most proba

Re: Introducing symbol versioning in FFmpeg

2009-12-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, Apologies for the delay in getting back to you. On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 09:27 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > We currently FFmpeg version 0.5 in lenny and squeeze. I noticed > difficulties when trying to update the distro packages to a recent svn > checkout, because the SONAME of libavutil ha