Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Mi, Jan 27, 2010 at 19:52:35 (CET), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 07:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> http://release.debian.org/~adsb/ffmpeg_binNMUs.txt is what I believe to
>>> be the list of packages potentially needing binNMUs.
>>>
>>> Exclud
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 07:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> http://release.debian.org/~adsb/ffmpeg_binNMUs.txt is what I believe to
> be the list of packages potentially needing binNMUs.
>
> Excluding those packages which have either had sourceful uploads in the
> past day or so (e.g. vtk) or have
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 07:57 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Mo, Dez 21, 2009 at 23:17:42 (CET), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > Please go ahead with the uploads introducing symbol versioning. In
> > order to ease transition, we'll schedule the required binNMUs once the
> > package has migrated t
On Mo, Dez 21, 2009 at 23:17:42 (CET), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead with the uploads introducing symbol versioning. In
> order to ease transition, we'll schedule the required binNMUs once the
> package has migrated to testing.
While ffmpeg not migrated to testing yet (will most proba
Hi,
Apologies for the delay in getting back to you.
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 09:27 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> We currently FFmpeg version 0.5 in lenny and squeeze. I noticed
> difficulties when trying to update the distro packages to a recent svn
> checkout, because the SONAME of libavutil ha