Re: LAME LGPL Modifications

2011-05-07 Thread fabian
Hey Andres,

 On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Mark Taylor m...@mp3dev.org wrote:
 I'd be happy to just delete this text from the README.

great, thanks for achieving this!

Cheers,
Fabian


___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: LAME LGPL Modifications

2011-05-06 Thread Andres Mejia
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Andres Mejia mcita...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Mark Taylor m...@mp3dev.org wrote:
 Hi Andres,

 I'd be happy to just delete this text from the README.

 Not sure if my sourceforge account will still work.  It would be
 quicker one of the other developers was willing to remove this text?
 Hence I'm forwarding to lame-...@lists.sf.net.

 Mark

 Ok. Thank you very much!

 Also, I'm going to assume I can remove this text from the README in
 the tarballs for any of the releases from LAME.

Before I rush to this, let me say that I hope nobody minds if I remove
this text from the tarball of LAME that will be redistributed
(hopefully) in Debian. Of course if anyone has objections, feel free
to raise them.

 On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:50 AM,  cer...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
 Hello,

 I'm sorry to bother you. I'm sure you have already been
 contacted with regards to LAME and the modifications you
 made to its license over 10 years ago. There's a possibility
 that LAME can be redistributed alongside Debian (despite the
 patent issues with LAME) if a certain issue is resolved.
 This issue is with regards to the modifications you
 introduced in the README file. The modifications are
 repeated below.

 This code is distributed under the GNU LESSER PUBLIC LICENSE
 (LGPL, see www.gnu.org) with the following modification:

 1. If you determine that distribution of LAME requires a
 patent license,
   and you obtain a patent license, you may distribute LAME
 even though
   redistribution of LAME may also require a patent license.

 2. You agree not to enforce any patent claims for any aspect of
   MPEG audio compression, or any other techniques contained in
   the LAME source code.

 The issue is mainly with the second modification which
 contradicts the terms of the LGPL which states.

 You may not impose any further restrictions on the
 recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein.

 This contradiction makes LAME undistributable (see [1] and [2]).

 I have sent a message to the Free Software Foundation and
 the Software Freedom Law Center in regards to this issue
 (see [3]). So far I haven't received a response from either
 of them. I have received a response from one of the current
 LAME developers however (I had CC'd the lame-dev mailing
 list). Since the time these extra restrictions were
 introduced, no other file was updated to add these
 restrictions. Thus there is confusion as to whether LAME is
 still licensed solely under LGPL or if these modifications
 to the LGPL which are stated in the README file also apply.
 The current LAME developers would like to remove those extra
 restrictions if they knew for sure that those restrictions
 only applied to the README or at least any file that doesn't
 contain any licensing information.

 Since you were the only person to introduce these changes,
 this is why I am sending you this lengthy message via
 sourceforge.net's messaging system. If you agree to have
 these modifications to the LGPL dropped for LAME, could you
 send a message to the current LAME developers allowing them
 to drop the modifications? You could also send me a message
 and I will route the message to them (I am not a LAME
 developer).

 Regards,
 Andres Mejia
 Email: mcita...@gmail.com

 1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2010/08/msg00049.html
 2.
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2011-April/017869.html
 3.
 https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=201105030019.30226.mcitadel%40gmail.comforum_name=lame-dev

 --
 This message has been sent to you, a registered SourceForge.net user,
 by another site user, through the SourceForge.net site.  This message
 has been delivered to your SourceForge.net mail alias.  You may reply
 to this message using the Reply feature of your email client, or
 using the messaging facility of SourceForge.net at:
 https://sourceforge.net/sendmessage.php?touser=1387939




 Again, thank you very much. :-)

 --
 Regards,
 Andres Mejia




-- 
Regards,
Andres Mejia

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers