Re: Processing of lame_3.98.4-1_i386.changes
Am 06.08.2010 14:41, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: Yes, I think so. It was there for transition purposes in ubuntu, but I think we no longer need it their as well Alright, I think lame and xvidcore are ready for a new upload. - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Processing of lame_3.98.4-1_i386.changes
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 07:50:41 (EDT), Fabian Greffrath wrote: > I've got two more questions with regard to lame: > > - Shouldn't we remove the .la file from the -dev package? Yes, we should. > - Should the shared lib package really Provides: liblame0? Yes, I think so. It was there for transition purposes in ubuntu, but I think we no longer need it their as well -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Processing of lame_3.98.4-1_i386.changes
I've got two more questions with regard to lame: - Shouldn't we remove the .la file from the -dev package? - Should the shared lib package really Provides: liblame0? - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
