FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:17.12-1
Current version: 1:17.12.1-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a da
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 20:52:41 +1100
Source: rosegarden
Binary: rosegarden
Architecture: source
Version: 1:17.12.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
Changed-By: Stuart Prescott
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:17.04-2
Current version: 1:17.12-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:17.04-1
Current version: 1:17.04-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
rosegarden 1:17.04-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-12-06
It is affected by these RC bugs:
881083: rosegarden: rosegarden FTBFS: Qt5LinguistTools*.cmake moved to
qttools5-dev
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2017 08:52:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#881083: fixed in rosegarden 1:17.04-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #881083,
regarding rosegarden FTBFS: Qt5LinguistTools*.cmake moved to qttools5-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Source: rosegarden
Version: 1:17.04-1
Severity: serious
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/rosegarden.html
...
-- Not building unit tests, using a static library for rosegarden
CMake Error at src/CMakeLists.txt:742 (find_package):
By not providing
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:16.06-1
Current version: 1:17.04-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Your message dated Sun, 27 Aug 2017 15:50:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#871213: fixed in rosegarden 1:17.04-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #871213,
regarding rosegarden: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target
'src/svnversion.h', needed by '
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source rosegarden
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'rosegarden'
Limit currently set to 'source':'rosegarden'
> tags 871213 + pending
Bug #871213 [src:rosegard
rosegarden 1:16.06-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-09-04
It is affected by these RC bugs:
871213: rosegarden: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target
'src/svnversion.h', needed by 'src/CMakeFiles/rosegardenprivate
Source: rosegarden
Version: 1:16.06-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:16.06-1
Severity: wishlist
User: p...@hungry.com
Usertags: appstream-modalias
Hi.
The rosegarden package is one of the packages in the Debian archive that
should be proposed for installation when a given hardware dongle is
inserted or available. Thanks to the
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:16.02-2
Current version: 1:16.06-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:16.02-1
Current version: 1:16.02-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jul 2016 10:27:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#831099: fixed in rosegarden 1:16.02-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #831099,
regarding rosegarden: FTBFS with GCC 6: PitchBendSequenceDialog.cpp:922:73:
error: call of overloaded 'abs(double)' is
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jul 2016 10:27:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#825993: fixed in rosegarden 1:16.02-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #825993,
regarding Rosegarden is not proposed when opening .rg files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Source: rosegarden
Version: 1:16.02-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160713 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS with GCC 6 on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid using the gcc-defaults package
available in experimental to make
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer writes:
qt-at-spi in initiated from
./X11/Xsession.d/90qt-a11y
You might want to take a look at that file and also try
unsetting QT_ACCESSIBILITY and QT_LINUX_ACCESSIBILITY_ALWAYS_ON
Yes, running `rosegarden` in an environment where
QT_ACCESSIBILITY=0
On lunes, 11 de abril de 2016 11:24:46 A. M. ART Alexis wrote:
> Just wanted to add that i too experience this issue, which i've
> worked around by renaming:
>
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt4/plugins/accessiblebridge/libqspiaccessiblebrid
> ge.so
>
> to:
>
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt4/plugins
ding state information... Done The
following packages will be REMOVED:
caribou caribou-antler gnome gnome-core gnome-orca
python-pyatspi python3-pyatspi qt-at-spi
-- END --
I tried installing qt-at-spi and running rosegarden, and it
still is not crashing when selecting the menus? Is the Orca
scr
[Alexis 2016-04-11]
> (i can't simply uninstall the qt-at-spi package, as that's transitively a
> dependency of gnome-core.)
I tried installing qt-at-spi and running rosegarden, and it still is not
crashing
when selecting the menus? Is the Orca screen reader needed too?
C
On 2016-06-01 10:34, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I agree that the approach has some disadvantage, and the one you quotes
> is the major one, but I believe it is less of a disadvantage for
> unskilled users than having Rosegarden fail to show up as an alternative
> when he is tryi
[Sebastian Ramacher]
> No, please don't. Please get file fixed to report the correct mimetype
> instead.
I'm not convinced that is possible. I've asked about this in
http://bugs.debian.org/825994 >.
Do you agree that it should be possible to click (or double click) on
Hi
On 2016-06-01 10:01:24, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> Package: rosegarden
> Version: 1:16.02-1
> Tags: patch
>
> When saving a file in Rosegarden, and then trying to use the KDE file
> manager to open the file, Rosegarden is not listed as an option for
> opening the
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:16.02-1
Tags: patch
When saving a file in Rosegarden, and then trying to use the KDE file
manager to open the file, Rosegarden is not listed as an option for
opening the file. The reason as far as I understand it is that the MIME
type for the file as reported by
Just wanted to add that i too experience this issue, which i've
worked around by renaming:
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt4/plugins/accessiblebridge/libqspiaccessiblebridge.so
to:
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt4/plugins/accessiblebridge/.libqspiaccessiblebridge.so
(i can't simply uninstall the q
rosegarden 1:15.12.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-03-27
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
814496: liblrdf: FTBFS: make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'distclean'.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailin
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:15.10.2-1
Current version: 1:15.12.1-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a da
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:15.10.1-1
Current version: 1:15.10.2-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a da
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:14.12-1
Current version: 1:15.10.1-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a da
e to a Ubuntu Bug concerning qt-at-spi (QTs
accessability).
>
> Removing it, and it worked...
This is a useful insight -- unfortunately, I still can't actually find anyone
who can make it crash with or without qt-at-spi installed.
While this bug certainly makes rosegarden unusable
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #785576 [rosegarden] rosegarden: crash. start, click view
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> tags -1 + help
Bug #785576 [rosegarden] rosegarden: crash. start, click view
Added tag(s) help.
--
785576: http
rosegarden 1:14.12-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-06-28
It is affected by these RC bugs:
785576: rosegarden: crash. start, click view
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
managed to
get additional details.
It would help if you were able to get a backtrace to work out where this was
coming from. There's a rosegarden-dbg package that you will definitely need and
I imagine you will need libqt4-dbg too.
https://wiki.debian.org/HowToGetABacktrace
thank
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #785576 [rosegarden] rosegarden: crash. start, click view
Added tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible.
--
785576: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785576
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #785576 [rosegarden] rosegarden: crash. start, click view
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #785576 to the same tags previously set
--
785576: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785576
Debian Bug Track
rosegarden 1:14.12-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-06-15
It is affected by these RC bugs:
785576: rosegarden: crash. start, click view
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:14.02-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
start rosegarden
click menu (View) (others crash too)
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:14.02-2
Current version: 1:14.12-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Your message dated Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:37:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#640673: fixed in rosegarden 1:14.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #640673,
regarding rosegarden: [i18n] Error in german translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:14.02-1
Current version: 1:14.02-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Your message dated Mon, 12 May 2014 15:45:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#747770: fixed in rosegarden 1:14.02-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #747770,
regarding rosegarden: FTBFS: error: Failed to find required libz library
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Source: rosegarden
Version: 1:14.02-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140510 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> check
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:13.10-1
Current version: 1:14.02-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:13.06-1
Current version: 1:13.10-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 640673 https://sourceforge.net/p/rosegarden/bugs/1423/
Bug #640673 [rosegarden] rosegarden: [i18n] Error in german translation
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://sourceforge.net/p/rosegarden/bugs/1423/'.
>
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2014 23:21:48 +1100
with message-id <201403092321.48199.stu...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#390409: rosegarden: "System timer resolution is too
low"
has caused the Debian Bug report #390409,
regarding rosegarden: "System timer resolut
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:13.04-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu trusty ubuntu-patch
Dear Maintainer,
What led up to the situation?
Ran Rosegarden in a terminal.
What was the outcome of this action?
Lots of debugging messages are
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:13.04-1
Current version: 1:13.06-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:12.04-1
Current version: 1:13.04-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:12.04-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream fixed-upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://sourceforge.net/p/rosegarden/bugs/1375/
Dear Maintainer,
exporting files (not saving, which works) with umlauts or other special
characters in their file name saves the
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://sourceforge.net/p/rosegarden/bugs/1375/
Bug #694406 [rosegarden] rosegarden: Exporting file with umlaut in file name,
the name is incorrectly saved
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://sourceforge.net/p/rosegarden/bugs/1375/'
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:11.11.42-1
Current version: 1:12.04-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a da
Your message dated Sun, 13 May 2012 22:52:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#667622: fixed in rosegarden 1:12.04-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #667622,
regarding rosegarden desktop file needs German L10n of Comment entry
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 13 May 2012 22:52:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#667359: fixed in rosegarden 1:12.04-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #667359,
regarding rosegarden: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Sun, 13 May 2012 22:52:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#663450: fixed in rosegarden 1:12.04-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #663450,
regarding rosegarden: Rosegarden should recommend wavpack
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 13 May 2012 22:52:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#655098: fixed in rosegarden 1:12.04-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #655098,
regarding rosegarden: multiarch - FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
rosegarden_12.04-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
extra.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debu
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:11.11.42-1~bpo60+1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
*** Please type your report below this line ***
I just noticed that GNOME uses the Comment entry of desktop files to
show a tooltip when hovering the mouse pointer over a menu entry.
Therefore the Comment entry needs a
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:11.11.42-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid wheezy
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.7
The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
gcc-4.7/g++-4.7, but succeeds to build with gcc-4.6/g++-4.6. The
severity of this report may
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:11.11.42-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Recording audio using Rosegarden crashes the program as the audio preview is
generated if wavpack is not installed. The audio was successfully recorded in
the ~/rosegarden folder. I tried to open it with a new instance
Package: rosegarden
Version: rosegarden: multiarch - FTBFS
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear maintainer,
in Ubuntu we apply this patch to fix FTBFS in multiarch, such as armel.
Could please kindly consider to apply this change at debian package too?
rosegarden
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:11.11.11-1
Current version: 1:11.11.42-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
rosegarden_11.11.42-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override
says extra.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, d
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2011 01:17:29 +0100
with message-id
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #652300,
regarding Rosegarden: On install: Triggers installation of KDE.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2011 23:47:57 +
with message-id <201112162348.04197.stuart+deb...@nanonanonano.net>
and subject line Bug#652300: Rosegarden: Recommended packages are required for
normal operation
has caused the Debian Bug report #652300,
regarding Rosegarden: On i
Hi Alessio,
> reverted, please leave a comment on the report before closing it.
ok -- thanks for your continued work on rosegarden (and so many other
packages!)
cheers
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescott--www.nanonanonano.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message p
Hi Stuart,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Stuart Prescott
wrote:
> If the user had already installed a pdf viewer and web browser, this wouldn't
> have been a problem -- perhaps the real bug is that xfce did not do so by
> default. Now, users will complain that they get weird error messages wh
Hi Alessio,
I see that you've recently changed the recommends on konqueror and okular down
to suggests in rosegarden:
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 871f7b3..f93662e 100644 (file)
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -43,11 +43,11 @@ Recommends:
cups-bsd
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:11.11.11-1
When I tried to install using command line apt-get
IT PRESUMABLY ATTEMPTED TO INSTALL KDE!
Install with --no-install-recommends went OK.
I suggest removing the recommends triggering this action ASAP.
I am using Debian GNU/Linux Testing Wheezy
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:11.06-1
Current version: 1:11.11.11-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a da
Your message dated Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:20:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#640991: fixed in rosegarden 1:11.11.11-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #640991,
regarding rosegarden: desktop file needs GenericName entries
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
rosegarden_11.11.11-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override
says extra.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, d
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:11.06-1~bpo60+1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
*** Please type your report below this line ***
The desktop file needs GenericName entries. Localized Name entries do
not need to be added when they don't differ from the original Name. The
attached patch fixes this
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:11.06-1
Tag: patch
Severity: minor
in data/locale/de.ts there is a translation error: Fifths is being
translated as "Fünftel". Whats really ment here is "Quinten", which is
a musical interval of 7 chromatic steps.
--- rosegarden-11.06/data/loca
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:53:49 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Black text on black background
has caused the Debian Bug report #591915,
regarding rosegarden: Black text on black background
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:11.02-2
Current version: 1:11.06-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
rosegarden_11.06-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
extra.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debu
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:11.02-1
Current version: 1:11.02-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Your message dated Tue, 17 May 2011 08:55:03 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Closing bug#591915
has caused the Debian Bug report #405765,
regarding rosegarden: percussion key mapping editor broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Tue, 17 May 2011 08:41:28 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Closing bug#405765
has caused the Debian Bug report #405765,
regarding rosegarden: percussion key mapping editor broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Tue, 17 May 2011 08:24:53 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #17408,
regarding rosegarden: verbose messages written to terminal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2011 21:36:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#592143: fixed in rosegarden 1:11.02-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #592143,
regarding rosegarden: Incorrect MIME type in .desktop file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
rosegarden_11.02-2_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
extra.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debu
Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2011 18:55:28 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#598405: [rosegarden] Segfaults when opening notation
editor
has caused the Debian Bug report #598405,
regarding [rosegarden] Segfaults when opening notation editor
to be marked as done.
This means that
Version: 1:11.02-1
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:47 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Running 1:11.02-1 right now and the notation editor doesn't crash the
> application anymore. Generally Rosegarden seems to be quite stable,
> however I haven't been using it that much recently.
Th
Hi,
Running 1:11.02-1 right now and the notation editor doesn't crash the
application anymore. Generally Rosegarden seems to be quite stable,
however I haven't been using it that much recently.
K.Ch.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:27:24PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
is this reproducible with the latest release in Debian testing?
Thanks in advance.
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0
___
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:10.10-2
Current version: 1:11.02-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
rosegarden_11.02-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
extra.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debu
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:10.04.2-1
Current version: 1:10.10-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a da
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
rosegarden_10.10-2_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
extra.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debu
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:10.04.2-1+b1
Severity: normal
I get random segfaults all over the place. Most happen on various actions in
the notation editor, but sometimes
it also crashes in the main view when e.g. merging tracks. I haven't found a
way to deterministically reproduce
any o
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:10.04.2-1+b1
Severity: wishlist
new upstream release with a lot of bugfixes
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.33.7-rt29-1-amd64 (S
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:10.04.2-1+b1
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Steps:
1. Installed rosegarden
2. Opened it
3. Clicked on a track to create a new segment
4. Tried to open notation editor to edit the segment
5. Crash.
All other editors work
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:10.04.2-1+b1
Severity: normal
Hi!
In the file
/usr/share/applications/rosegarden.desktop
the MIME type audio/x-flac is listed.
The result is that Rosegarden is proposed (or even the default) as an
application
to open FLAC files on the right-click menu in
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:10.04.2-1+b1
Severity: normal
Within "Configure Rosegarden", under "General" and "Behaviour", there is a
"Details" button for the Sequencer status. It produces a window that contains
black text on a black background.
FYI: The status of the rosegarden source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:1.7.3-1.1
Current version: 1:10.04.2-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a da
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Jonas,
> Rosegarden needs some love.
>
> If noone objects, I will provide it some - including "infecting" it with
> CDBS.
A quick look at the current git will show that I have already given it a lot
love, updated it t
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo