Re: dpkg source format 3 (quilt) packages, was: RFS: a52dec.git

2010-01-28 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 10.12.2009 16:02, schrieb Felipe Sateler: On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 09:38 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Rationale: switching to v3 at this point introduces even more inconsistency in our packaging and obviously our advocated tool 'git-buildpackage' doesn't cope with this new format properly

Re: dpkg source format 3 (quilt) packages, was: RFS: a52dec.git

2009-12-10 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 07:37 +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: 2009/12/10 Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de: Dmitrijs Ledkovs dmitrij.led...@gmail.com writes: Hello DD's Please sponsor new revision of a52dec. 1) Hopefully I generated changelog with git-dch correctly 2) There is

Re: dpkg source format 3 (quilt) packages, was: RFS: a52dec.git

2009-12-10 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 09:38 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com writes: Is this really the intended way? TBH, I have doubts, and would find it more natural if the patches would be applied to the debian branch then, as it would retain the invariant that a

dpkg source format 3 (quilt) packages, was: RFS: a52dec.git

2009-12-09 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Dmitrijs Ledkovs dmitrij.led...@gmail.com writes: Hello DD's Please sponsor new revision of a52dec. 1) Hopefully I generated changelog with git-dch correctly 2) There is warning from lintian about man pages. I cannot currently reproduce it outside chroot and still looking for ways to fix