On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 04:54:43PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> I had jackd1 in master/upstream and jackd2 in
>> master.jackd2/upstream.jackd2. Given that we want to re-introduce
>> jackd1, it might be a good idea to fix this (if possible). OTOH, we
>> could create a dedicated jackd1 re
Hi Adrian,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 04:18:54PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
It looks like the branches in our jackd repo have been merged. Was this
intended?
Yes, it was intended.
Once upon a time (some weeks ago) we decided to switch from jackd1 to
jackd2, without looking back, i.e. treating
Hi!
It looks like the branches in our jackd repo have been merged. Was this
intended?
I had jackd1 in master/upstream and jackd2 in
master.jackd2/upstream.jackd2. Given that we want to re-introduce
jackd1, it might be a good idea to fix this (if possible). OTOH, we
could create a dedicated jackd1
