Re: please upload: pd-pdogg

2011-04-26 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Apr 25, 2011, at 1:44 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/25/2011 06:13 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I'd like to keep the short-form dh packages i think everybody now agrees that what we are discussing should be irrelevant of whether a

Re: please upload: pd-pdogg

2011-04-26 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-04-26 18:40, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I am not saying the same version of the same Makefile sure. What made the current thing hard to fix? nothing. it was trivial. This HURD/kFreeBSD build issue was going to be fixed upstream

Re: please upload: pd-pdogg

2011-04-25 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Apr 24, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 13:02, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote: I see that some bugs (buils system, mostly) will require uploading all (or most) of the pd externals. Can we do something to avoid that? hmm, i'm not sure if i

Re: please upload: pd-pdogg

2011-04-25 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/25/2011 06:13 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I'd like to keep the short-form dh packages i think everybody now agrees that what we are discussing should be irrelevant of whether a specific package uses dh or cdbs or whatever. that I've

Re: please upload: pd-pdogg

2011-04-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
I see that some bugs (buils system, mostly) will require uploading all (or most) of the pd externals. Can we do something to avoid that? hmm, i'm not sure if i understand what you mean: i thought bugs can only be fixed by providing fixed versions. if a package is FTBFS because of broken

Re: please upload: pd-pdogg

2011-04-24 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 13:02, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote: I see that some bugs (buils system, mostly) will require uploading all (or most) of the pd externals. Can we do something to avoid that? hmm, i'm not sure if i understand what you mean: i thought bugs can only be fixed

Re: please upload: pd-pdogg

2011-04-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 11-04-24 at 12:16pm, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 13:02, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote: I see that some bugs (buils system, mostly) will require uploading all (or most) of the pd externals. Can we do something to avoid that? hmm, i'm not sure if i

Re: please upload: pd-pdogg

2011-04-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 06:26:37PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On 11-04-24 at 12:16pm, Felipe Sateler wrote: This is the key part: for most pd externals, the makefile is essentially the same. Does it make sense to centralize that? What do others think? Do you mean using CDBS for

Re: please upload: pd-pdogg

2011-04-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 11-04-24 at 09:39pm, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 06:26:37PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On 11-04-24 at 12:16pm, Felipe Sateler wrote: This is the key part: for most pd externals, the makefile is essentially the same. Does it make sense to centralize that?

Re: please upload: pd-pdogg

2011-04-22 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:35, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 some of the pd-packages have an FTBFS bug reported. i fixed all of those packages (i knew of), and would appreciate if somebody could upload the package, as given in the

please upload: pd-pdogg

2011-04-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 some of the pd-packages have an FTBFS bug reported. i fixed all of those packages (i knew of), and would appreciate if somebody could upload the package, as given in the subject (i admit i don't type this entire letter for each of the packages).