Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] libexif-gtk/0.4.0-2

On 2018-04-29 Hugh McMaster <hugh.mcmas...@outlook.com> wrote: > On Sunday, 29 April 2018 10:11 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > > 0.4.0-1 says "Switch to LGPL-2.1+ for libexif-gtk 0.4.0.". Is this > > correct? While COPYING contains a copy of LGPL-2.1 only a singl

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] libexif-gtk/0.4.0-2

ebb93e97ee71883cc265bab268597d10c35d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Metzler <ametz...@bebt.de> Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 13:42:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add lost change: Use 'uversionmangle' instead of 'oversionmangle'. --- debian/watch | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 de

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] libexif-gtk/0.4.0-2

On 2018-04-29 Hugh McMaster wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > Dear mentors and Debian PhotoTools Team, > I am looking for a sponsor for a Team Upload of the package "libexif-gtk". > Version 0.4.0-1 is is currently in Experimental and is

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#911022: flann breaks hugin autopkgtest: undefined symbol: LZ4_resetStreamHC

On 2018-10-16 Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > Okay, confirmed. So the failing autpkgtest is fixed by flann -6 and I > only need to fix hugin's FTBFS. ... which is fixed with the latest hugin upload. ___ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list Pkg-phot

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#911022: flann breaks hugin autopkgtest: undefined symbol: LZ4_resetStreamHC

On 2018-10-14 Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > * Paul Gevers [2018-10-14 21:47]: >> Source: flann, hugin >> Control: found -1 flann/1.9.1+dfsg-4 >> Control: found -1 hugin/2018.0.0+dfsg-2 [...] >> With a recent upload of flann the autopkgtest of hugin fails in testing >> when that autopkgtest is run

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#911022: flann breaks hugin autopkgtest: undefined symbol: LZ4_resetStreamHC

On 2018-10-15 Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > * Andreas Metzler [2018-10-15 17:23]: [...] > > Anyway, this change seems to be a ABI break for flann, I guess it will > > need to add a > > Breaks: hugin (<< fixed-version~) > I don't think that's needed, flann_cpp l

[Pkg-phototools-devel] openexr 2.3.0 and dh 11 - merge request

Hello, in case you have not enabled mail notifications for openexr here is a pointer to a merge-request fixing building openexr with dh compat 11. https://salsa.debian.org/debian-phototools-team/openexr/merge_requests/1 cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#917457: libilmbase23: 2.3.0-3 bumped so name without transition (breaks digikam, gimp, ...)

On 2018-12-29 "Matteo F. Vescovi" wrote: > Andreas, > I'll open a specific transition bug report for that, once I've tested all > r-deps but not earlier. > Thus, I'll leave this bug report closed since it tracks another issue (or > feature, at your choice ;) ). I do not understand your

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#924256: openjpeg2: FTBFS: Can't exec "jh_build": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh line 908.

Control: reassign -1 javahelper 0.72.3 Control: forcemerge 923748 924256 Control: retitle -1 shebang line in jh_build "#!/use/bin/perl" On 2019-03-10 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Source: openjpeg2 > Version: 2.3.0-1.1 > Severity: serious > Justification: ftbfs > Hi > While trying to adress

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#939747: hugin does not run native on wayland

Package: hugin Version: 2019.0.0+dfsg-2 - Forwarded message from Carsten Wolf - Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 12:04:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Carsten Wolf Subject: hugin/2019.0.0+dfsg-2 debian sid/testing crashing on start (amd64 as well x86/32bit) greetings to the debian maintainers of

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Luminance-HDR crashes on opening image

On 2019-11-25 David Jones wrote: > Good afternoon! > I tried reporting it via their SourceForge site, but there's apparently no > way to report an issue there. > Their SourceForge says the best way to get support is to go to their Github > site, but that fails with an error 500. [...] Hello

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#941742: FTBFS against Octave 5

On 2019-10-04 Sébastien Villemot wrote: > Package: src:pfstools > Version: 2.1.0-4 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch ftbfs > Control: block 934630 by -1 > Dear Maintainer, > The Octave 5 transition has started, and pfstools FTBFS against the new > version. > The failure comes from the fact

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Request to join the Debian PhotoTools Team group

On 2020-03-15 wf...@debian.org wrote: [...] > Hi folks, > Thanks for accepting me into the team. Before I do any further harm: > does anybody object against merging the upstream git history into the > upstream branch of libgphoto2? I've already pushed that (but not > master) to Salsa so you can

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#960691: RFS: libexif/0.6.21-7 -- library to parse EXIF files

On 2020-05-15 Hugh McMaster wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > Dear mentors and Debian PhotoTools Team members, > I am looking for a sponsor for the package "libexif" > * Package name: libexif >Version : 0.6.21-7 [..] Will do. cu Andreas -- `What a

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#966904: pfstools: FTBFS: array2d.h:173:9: error: ‘__assert_fail’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘MagickCore::__assert_fail’?

On 2020-08-28 peter green wrote: > Tags 966904 +patch > thanks > The issue is that Magick++.h (indirectly) includes assert.h inside a > namespace. [...] > I would argue that is a bug in imagemagick and have filed bugs in both Debian > and upstream as >

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#966904: pfstools: FTBFS: array2d.h:173:9: error: ‘__assert_fail’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘MagickCore::__assert_fail’?

On 2020-09-24 peter green wrote: > On 24/09/2020 06:25, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] >> Did you note that the ImageMagick6 issue 95 has an comment ("We compiled >> your source under Fedora and Centos without complaint [...] Perhaps >> there is a problem in the Debian

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#976965: hugin-tools: unsolvable dependency "python << 3.9", current testing pkg has "python << 3.10"

On 2020-12-09 Philipp Marek via Pkg-phototools-devel wrote: > Package: hugin-tools > Version: 2020.0~beta1+dfsg-1 > Severity: normal > This package from experimental can't be installed unless the python3=3.7 > from stable package is installed. > I guess that's a typo or so, the current

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#978475: hugin lens calibration gui asserts at startup

Control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/1909484 Forwarded to upstream BTS. -- Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list Pkg-phototools-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Package: luminance-hdr (2.5.1+dfsg-3 and others)

On 2021-05-09 paolo gagini wrote: > Hi, > the software Luminance HDR 2.6.0 is out. > Could you update the package? [...] 2.6.0 has been available in Debian since 2019-08-23, see https://packages.debian.org/luminance-hdr I will upload 2.6.1 soonish. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#985466: buster-pu: package libpano13/2.9.19+dfsg-3+deb10u1

+ + * 850_f02459498cb4_Prevent_string_vulnerability_by_refusing.diff +cherry-picked from 2.9.20 rc3: Fixes format string bug, pasing along +format strings in user specified output filename to printf. +Closes: #985249 + + -- Andreas Metzler Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:12:08 +0100 + libpano13 (2.9.19+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=medium

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Any way to incorporate patches into Debian that make libvigraimpex build again?

On 2021-12-27 Omari Stephens wrote: [...] > If I and/or others were able to get libvigraimpex compiling again, is there > any chance of those changes making it into Debian in some fashion, in order > to unstick the other people who depend on hugin/enfuse/enblend? [...] Good morning, if there

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#998498: pfstools: FTBFS: stl_algobase.h:278:56: error: macro "min" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2

X-Debbugs-Cc: libnetpbm10-...@packages.debian.org On 2021-11-04 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: pfstools > Version: 2.2.0-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm > Hi, > During a rebuild of all

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Fwd: Bits from the Release Team: bookworm freeze dates (preliminary)

On 2022-03-15 Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Matteo, > If I read the message below correctly, it is impossible for us to > upload openexr 3.x anymore, right ? > -- Forwarded message - > [...] > 2022-01-12 - Milestone 1 - Transition and toolchain freeze > 2022-02-12 -

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#1009308: libopenexr-dev: Missing Breaks/Replaces libilmbase-dev

Package: libopenexr-dev Version: 3.1.4-1 Severity: normal ~~~ (sid)root@argenau:/# apt install libopenexr-dev=3.1.4-1 [...] The following additional packages will be installed: libimath-3-1-29 libimath-dev libopenexr-3-1-30 The following packages will be REMOVED: libilmbase-dev* The following

Bug#1050676: enblend-enfuse: FTBFS: dot: maze.c:311: chkSgraph: Assertion `np->cells[0]' failed.

Control: reassign -1 graphviz 2.42.2-7 On 2023-08-27 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Source: enblend-enfuse > Version: 4.2-10 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > Dear maintainer, > enblend-enfuse fails to build from

Bug#1054129: Hugin fails to pass error messages from enblend to user

Control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/2041687 On 2023-10-17 Michael Deegan wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 2023.0~beta1+dfsg-1 > Severity: normal > Hello, like in #799730, I encountered a case where stitching would abort, > and the user would be left wondering why, with

Bug#1055268: hugin crashes to the point of restarting GDM3

On 2023-11-03 carsten wolf wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 2023.0~rc1+dfsg-1 > Severity: normal > Dear Maintainer, > *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** >* What led up to the situation? > starting hugin > import 2x png images to stich. >*

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Apparently uncoordinated libnetpbm transition.

On 2022-07-09 Paul Gevers wrote: > On 26-05-2022 06:17, Andreas Tille wrote: [...] > I checked today why dose [1] was still reporting this issue today. Although > your last commit in salsa suggests you intended to upload, the package > didn't appear in the archive yet. [...] Hello,

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#1009308: libopenexr-dev: Missing Breaks/Replaces libilmbase-dev

Control: severity -1 serious On 2022-04-11 Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > dpkg: error processing archive > /var/cache/apt/archives/libopenexr-dev_3.1.4-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): > trying to overwrite '/usr/include/OpenEXR/Iex.h', which is also in package > libilmbase-dev:amd64 2.

Bug#1019833: hugin: Please transition to wxwidgets3.2

Control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/1989723 On 2022-09-14 s...@techie.net wrote: > Source: hugin > Severity: normal > Control: block 1019416 by -1 > Hi, > Please transition hugin from wxwidgets3.0 to wxwidgets3.2. > wxWidgets 3.2 (a new API/ABI stable release) has been

Re: netpbm-free ready to upload

On 2022-10-06 Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Andreas, > I noticed you added some missing information to d/copyright > of netpbm-free. Thanks a lot for doing so. Do you think it > is time for another upload? I invested a couple of hours but sadly it is not a finished effort. cu Andreas

Bug#1024368: Problems updating libopenexr25 from version 2.5.4-2 to 2.5.7-1

On 2022-11-18 Сергей Фёдоров wrote: > Package: libopenexr25 > Version: 2.5.4-2 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: serfyod...@yandex.ru > Dear Maintainer, > When trying to update the package "libopenexr25" from version 2.5.4-2 to > 2.5.7-1, > the message is displayed: Depends on:

Bug#1023954: WX assertion failure within the raw importer

On 2022-11-13 Michael Deegan wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 2021.0.0+dfsg-3 > Severity: normal > The raw file importer triggers an assertion after selecting the raw importer > (dcraw, in my case) to use: > ASSERT INFO: > ./src/common/sizer.cpp(2267): assert

Bug#1029238: imv not found in $PATH

On 2023-01-20 tester732732 via Pkg-phototools-devel wrote: > Package: imv > Version: 4.3.0-1.1+b3 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > X-Debbugs-Cc: devnull771...@proton.me > Dear Maintainer, >* What led up to the situation? > After installing imv on debian

Bug#1023279: Segfault on startup; stack overflow involving libwx

On 2022-11-01 Michael Deegan wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 2021.0.0+dfsg-3 > Severity: important > Console output: [...] > ERROR: 22:42:22.231532 (./src/hugin1/hugin/GLViewer.cpp:133) > SetUpContext(): Error initialising GLEW: Unknown error. > Segmentation fault > I'm wondering if

Bug#1033617: libopenexr-dev: Cannot just upgrade libopenexr-dev to 3.1.5-4 because of file conflict with older version of libilmbase-dev

On 2023-04-20 Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Andreas, > On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 15:06:14 +0200 Andreas Metzler wrote: > > I think 2.5.7-2 was the last sourceful < 3 upload, so (<< 2.5.7-3) > > should work. > And to be backports and other local packages, I think that

Bug#1034986: xmorph: missing Breaks+Replaces for libmorph when upgrading from bullseye

On 2023-04-27 Helmut Grohne wrote: > Package: xmorph > Version: 1:20150712-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: dpkg unpack error > Attempting to unpack xmorph/1:20150712-1 from Debian bookworm > on a minimal Debian bullseye with libmorph/1:20140707+nmu2.1 > installed, causes an unpack error

Bug#1034986: xmorph: missing Breaks+Replaces for libmorph when upgrading from bullseye

On 2023-04-29 Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > Trivial patch: [...] I will fix this. cu Andreas

Bug#1033617: libopenexr-dev: Cannot just upgrade libopenexr-dev to 3.1.5-4 because of file conflict with older version of libilmbase-dev

ilmbase-dev Breaks/Replaces binNMU-safe. +Closes: #1033617 + + -- Andreas Metzler Fri, 31 Mar 2023 15:02:17 +0200 + openexr (3.1.5-4) unstable; urgency=medium * d/control: Add missing zlib1g-dev dependency. Closes: #1017516 diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 5fecc23..3d783c2 100644 --

Bug#1033617: libopenexr-dev: Cannot just upgrade libopenexr-dev to 3.1.5-4 because of file conflict with older version of libilmbase-dev

On 2023-03-28 Felix Stupp wrote: > Package: libopenexr-dev > Version: 3.1.5-4 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 7.4 > X-Debbugs-Cc: me+debian-b...@banananet.work > Dear Maintainer, > I cannot upgrade this package from version 2.5.7-1 to version 3.1.5-4 > due to a file conflict with

Bug#1036584: libopenjpip-viewer: broken symlink: /usr/bin/opj_jpip_viewer -> ../share/opj_jpip_viewer/opj_jpip_viewer.jar

On 2023-05-24 Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 6:21 PM Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > > Correct patch attached. Stuff was built but the respective dh_install > > call was shadowed and therefore content was not shipped in the package. > [...] > -over

Bug#1036584: libopenjpip-viewer: broken symlink: /usr/bin/opj_jpip_viewer -> ../share/opj_jpip_viewer/opj_jpip_viewer.jar

LEASED; urgency=medium + + * Team upload. + * Fix broken symlink. Closes: #1036584 + + -- Andreas Metzler Wed, 24 May 2023 12:45:48 +0200 + openjpeg2 (2.5.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version 2.5.0 diff -Nru openjpeg2-2.5.0/debian/openjpeg-doc.install openjpeg2-2.5.0/deb

Bug#1036584: libopenjpip-viewer: broken symlink: /usr/bin/opj_jpip_viewer -> ../share/opj_jpip_viewer/opj_jpip_viewer.jar

Hello, if you have not got time for an upload I can look into it. cu Andreas

Re: Question about Luminance HDR package in Bookworm

On 2023-07-24 david wrote: > Hello! > This is the homepage you have listed for it under Properties: > https://qtpfsgui.sourceforge.net/ > Yet that site only lists v2.6.0 as the published version - in 2019. > There's also this site that similarly lists v2.6.0 as the published version, > again

Re: Luminance HDR 2.6.1.1+dfsg-2+b2 from Bookworm repository crashes when run

On 2023-07-21 "xiao sheng wen(肖盛文)" wrote: > 在 2023/7/21 16:41, david 写道: > > Thanks. "sudo apt purge libopenexr25" reported "E: Unable to locate > > package libopenexr25". > It's good! > After you run ldconfig,  Is the crash still occur? > What is your output of run: > ldd

Bug#1023954: WX assertion failure within the raw importer

On 2023-04-25 Michael Deegan wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 2022.0.0+dfsg-2 > Followup-For: Bug #1023954 > Hello, > I can confirm this bug still also occurs with 2022.0.0+dfsg-2. > I'm currently using dcraw as converter of choice (as having to close > Darktable each time I want to import

Bug#302715: Please add ppmsvgalib to netpbm

On 2005-04-02 Michelle Konzack wrote: > Package: netpbm > Version: 2:10.0-8 > Severity: wishlist > Hello Andreas, > please add the 'ppmsvgalib' to the package. I do not like to > compile the packages each time my self by modifiing Makefiles. > And while working on console and with scripts,

Bug#325088: netpbm: pnmtopng -alpha produces incorrect output

On 2005-08-26 Nigel Williams wrote: > Package: netpbm > Version: 2:10.0-8 > Severity: normal > The following sequence of commands should result in an identical bitmap, > but does not. It has a small vertical black bar in it. > --- > pngtopnm yellow_red_gradient.png > x.pnm > pngtopnm -alpha

Bug#266491: Patch against unstable

On 2006-08-17 Nigel Williams wrote: > Here's another fix for the bug, this time against the unstable > version. [...] Hello Nigel, could you please doublecheck whether the problem is still present in recent (11.x) versions? cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His

Bug#1056931: libgphoto2-6: Move files into /usr (incl. DEP17 P7 mitigation)

On 2023-11-26 Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: [...] > Please consider applying this patch at your earliest convenience. Looks good to me, thanks! @Ferenc: I can fix this via a Team upload, unless you do not want me to. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends

Bug#1056931: libgphoto2-6: Move files into /usr (incl. DEP17 P7 mitigation)

On 2023-12-06 Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: [...] > Are there any blockers, or could this move forward? > I expect all other packages will have fixes in unstable on December > 10th, and then I would like to continue with the next steps for the > udev rules migrations. Hello, I have just made the

Bug#1061667: netpbm: ppmtowinicon crash makes kcemu FTBFS

On 2024-01-28 Adrian Bunk wrote: > ppmtowinicon -andpgms \ > kcemu-winicon_16x16.ppm kcemu-winicon_16x16.alpha.pgm \ > kcemu-winicon_32x32.ppm kcemu-winicon_32x32.alpha.pgm \ > kcemu-winicon_48x48.ppm kcemu-winicon_48x48.alpha.pgm \ > > kcemu-winicon.ico > malloc():

Re: Photoswipe

On 2024-01-31 Tino Mettler wrote: > I'd like to bring Photoswipe into Debian. There is an open RFP for it, > but that applies to an old upstream version that was based on jQuery > and less complex. Meanwhile, nhe nature of the project has changed a > lot, and now Photoswipe is NodeJS based. I

Bug#1065747: libgphoto2-2t64: drop unnecessary DEP17 diversions

Control: tags -1 pending On 2024-03-09 Helmut Grohne wrote: > Package: libgphoto2-6t64 > Version: 2.5.31-2.1 > Severity: minor > Tags: patch > User: helm...@debian.org > Usertags: dep17p7 > Hi, > Chris Hofstaedtler recently added protective diversions for Multi-Arch: > same shared file loss in

Bug#1066963: xmorph: FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

Source: xmorph Version: 1:20150712-5 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hello, there are multiple implicit function errors when trying to build xmorph, some trivial, but also an API issue: 8X-- In file included from RgbaImage.c:935: RgbaImage.c: In function 'rgbaImageWarp': warp.h:19:20: