Your message dated Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:18:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#446653: Attempting to use PTStitcher crashes hugin
has caused the Debian Bug report #446653,
regarding Attempting to use PTStitcher crashes hugin
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
446653: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=446653
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: hugin
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: normal
I have used Hugin successfully for many image panoramas using the "nona"
engine, but I would like to use the exposure correction provided by the
"PTSticher" engine. Any time I attempt to perform a render using
PTSticher, a file prompt appears, which I fill-in, and then the
stitching-in-progress dialog appears for a short time (less than a
second) before Hugin exits with only the message
"Illegal instruction" given in its terminal output. The exit code of the
program is 132.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages hugin depends on:
ii hugin-bin 0.6.1-1+b1 hugin binaries
ii hugin-tools 0.6.1-1+b1 some tools for hugin
ii libpano12-bin 2.8.3-1 panorama tools utilities
hugin recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-1
Brian Sipos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (11/08/2008):
> Yes, the new exposure correction is a major improvement and, I
> suppose, would invalidate this bug. I recommend closing the bug.
Thanks, acting accordingly.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
