[1]
View Full Collection!!! [2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
Links:
--
[1]
http://massmail.benefistutu.com/mailster/315/91d9675d6940e68e7e5eed2b26a6518b/aHR0cDovL3BhcmtlcnJvYmluc29uc2FyYXNvdGEuY29tLw
[2]
On Jan 6, 2018 09:36, "Sam Hartman" wrote:
> "Samuel" == Samuel Thibault writes:
Samuel> Hello,
Samuel> Sam Hartman, on sam. 06 janv. 2018 06:09:44 -0500, wrote:
>> * Will limiting the number of streams speech-dispatcher opens
>>
Sam Hartman, on sam. 06 janv. 2018 09:26:39 -0500, wrote:
> That makes sense to me, but is different than your earlier answer of it
> shouldn't matter because they are dormant.
I just meant that the presence of the modules themselves is not a
problem.
> If there's a benefit in suspending the
> "Samuel" == Samuel Thibault writes:
Samuel> Sam Hartman, on sam. 06 janv. 2018 07:36:25 -0500, wrote:
>> > "Samuel" == Samuel Thibault writes:
>>
Samuel> Hello,
Samuel> Sam Hartman, on sam. 06 janv. 2018 06:09:44 -0500,
Scott Leggett, on sam. 06 janv. 2018 23:47:42 +1100, wrote:
> How about this?
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2010-January/006033.html
Thanks for the pointers!
> the speakup daemons need to be modified so that they can be run as a
> normal user instead of root
I have
On 2017-12-30.01:11, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Incompatibility between espeakup and pulseaudio is a recurring issue
> which AIUI has never actually been settled (or nobody took the time to
> implement a solution in Debian).
Yes, one bug tracking this is #864829.
> - currently espeakup runs as
Sam Hartman, on sam. 06 janv. 2018 07:36:25 -0500, wrote:
> > "Samuel" == Samuel Thibault writes:
>
> Samuel> Hello,
> Samuel> Sam Hartman, on sam. 06 janv. 2018 06:09:44 -0500, wrote:
> >> * Will limiting the number of streams speech-dispatcher opens
>
> "Samuel" == Samuel Thibault writes:
Samuel> Hello,
Samuel> Sam Hartman, on sam. 06 janv. 2018 06:09:44 -0500, wrote:
>> * Will limiting the number of streams speech-dispatcher opens
>> have any significant improvement. Are there actual costs to
>>
Hello,
Sam Hartman, on sam. 06 janv. 2018 06:09:44 -0500, wrote:
> * Will limiting the number of streams speech-dispatcher opens have any
> significant improvement. Are there actual costs to having the
> sd_generic and sd_dummy streams open even when they are unneeded?
I don't think there
I'd appreciate being copied on replies.
hi.
A while ago I was looking at the power usage of our GUI screen reader
stack. I came back to that project recently.
I'm running stock stretch with Orca. I'm running pulseaudio and
speech-dispatcher both as user processes.
I was initially suspicious
10 matches
Mail list logo