Hello, All.
I cloned svn repo with git-svn and experimented a little bit.
Local repo size:
Git: 34M
SVN: 598M
WTF? 598MB and there is no local history?
Ok. I checked out topmost directory. Lets check trunk/
$ cd trunk
$ du -sh
84M
Much better, but:
- no history
- no light branches
- no my
On 17/01/11 at 13:53 +0200, Antono Vasiljev wrote:
Hello, All.
I cloned svn repo with git-svn and experimented a little bit.
Local repo size:
Git: 34M
SVN: 598M
WTF? 598MB and there is no local history?
Ok. I checked out topmost directory. Lets check trunk/
$ cd trunk
$ du -sh
I tried gem2deb created by Lucas and it was very useful!
It generates default control with ruby-anything package name...
Does this mean that we going to adapt python-like policy for
ruby packages?
What naming conventions should I use?
--
xmpp:s...@antono.info
http://antono.info/
On 17/01/11 at 14:02 +0200, Antono Vasiljev wrote:
I tried gem2deb created by Lucas and it was very useful!
It generates default control with ruby-anything package name...
Does this mean that we going to adapt python-like policy for
ruby packages?
What naming conventions should I use?
See
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Antono Vasiljev
antono.vasil...@gmail.com wrote:
Almost every big ruby project use git today. Why should we use SVN?
So. I would like to know your cons/pros about switching to git.
Its my '+1' for git for pkg-ruby-extras.
I'm +1 for Git. We use it at Opscode
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote:
svn-buildpackage wouldn't work with git.
That's a -1000 considering that our current workflow deeply relies on
svn-bp.
Would it really be a big deal to change the workflow to use git-buildpackage?
I don't even
On 17/01/11 at 10:09 -0700, Joshua Timberman wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote:
svn-buildpackage wouldn't work with git.
That's a -1000 considering that our current workflow deeply relies on
svn-bp.
Would it really be a big deal to
Excerpts from Lucas Nussbaum's message of Mon Jan 17 20:30:56 +0200 2011:
svn-buildpackage wouldn't work with git.
That's a -1000 considering that our current workflow deeply relies on
svn-bp.
Ok. Let's think positive. What required in order to replace
svn-buildpackage with
On 17/01/11 at 20:55 +0200, Antono Vasiljev wrote:
Excerpts from Lucas Nussbaum's message of Mon Jan 17 20:30:56 +0200 2011:
svn-buildpackage wouldn't work with git.
That's a -1000 considering that our current workflow deeply relies on
svn-bp.
Ok. Let's think positive. What