[DRE-maint] Experiments with git

2011-01-17 Thread Antono Vasiljev
Hello, All. I cloned svn repo with git-svn and experimented a little bit. Local repo size: Git: 34M SVN: 598M WTF? 598MB and there is no local history? Ok. I checked out topmost directory. Lets check trunk/ $ cd trunk $ du -sh 84M Much better, but: - no history - no light branches - no my

Re: [DRE-maint] Experiments with git

2011-01-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 17/01/11 at 13:53 +0200, Antono Vasiljev wrote: Hello, All. I cloned svn repo with git-svn and experimented a little bit. Local repo size: Git: 34M SVN: 598M WTF? 598MB and there is no local history? Ok. I checked out topmost directory. Lets check trunk/ $ cd trunk $ du -sh

[DRE-maint] gem2deb and package naming

2011-01-17 Thread Antono Vasiljev
I tried gem2deb created by Lucas and it was very useful! It generates default control with ruby-anything package name... Does this mean that we going to adapt python-like policy for ruby packages? What naming conventions should I use? -- xmpp:s...@antono.info http://antono.info/

Re: [DRE-maint] gem2deb and package naming

2011-01-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 17/01/11 at 14:02 +0200, Antono Vasiljev wrote: I tried gem2deb created by Lucas and it was very useful! It generates default control with ruby-anything package name... Does this mean that we going to adapt python-like policy for ruby packages? What naming conventions should I use? See

Re: [DRE-maint] Experiments with git

2011-01-17 Thread Joshua Timberman
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Antono Vasiljev antono.vasil...@gmail.com wrote: Almost every big ruby project use git today. Why should we use SVN? So. I would like to know your cons/pros about switching to git. Its my '+1' for git for pkg-ruby-extras. I'm +1 for Git. We use it at Opscode

Re: [DRE-maint] Experiments with git

2011-01-17 Thread Joshua Timberman
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote: svn-buildpackage wouldn't work with git. That's a -1000 considering that our current workflow deeply relies on svn-bp. Would it really be a big deal to change the workflow to use git-buildpackage? I don't even

Re: [DRE-maint] Experiments with git

2011-01-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 17/01/11 at 10:09 -0700, Joshua Timberman wrote: On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote: svn-buildpackage wouldn't work with git. That's a -1000 considering that our current workflow deeply relies on svn-bp. Would it really be a big deal to

Re: [DRE-maint] Experiments with git

2011-01-17 Thread Antono Vasiljev
Excerpts from Lucas Nussbaum's message of Mon Jan 17 20:30:56 +0200 2011: svn-buildpackage wouldn't work with git. That's a -1000 considering that our current workflow deeply relies on svn-bp. Ok. Let's think positive. What required in order to replace svn-buildpackage with

Re: [DRE-maint] Experiments with git

2011-01-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 17/01/11 at 20:55 +0200, Antono Vasiljev wrote: Excerpts from Lucas Nussbaum's message of Mon Jan 17 20:30:56 +0200 2011: svn-buildpackage wouldn't work with git. That's a -1000 considering that our current workflow deeply relies on svn-bp. Ok. Let's think positive. What