[DRE-maint] Processed: found 769359 in ruby-fog/1.22.0-2

2014-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: found 769359 ruby-fog/1.22.0-2 Bug #769359 [ruby-fog-sakuracloud,ruby-fog] ruby-fog-sakuracloud,ruby-fog: error when trying to install together Marked as found in versions ruby-fog/1.22.0-2. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

[DRE-maint] Processed: found 769359 in ruby-fog-sakuracloud/0.1.1-1

2014-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: found 769359 ruby-fog-sakuracloud/0.1.1-1 Bug #769359 [ruby-fog-sakuracloud,ruby-fog] ruby-fog-sakuracloud,ruby-fog: error when trying to install together Marked as found in versions ruby-fog-sakuracloud/0.1.1-1. thanks Stopping processing here.

[DRE-maint] origami_1.2.7-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2014-11-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 18:06:05 -0200 Source: origami Binary: ruby-origami origami Architecture: source all Version: 1.2.7-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers

Re: [DRE-maint] Comments regarding origami_1.2.7-1_amd64.changes

2014-11-13 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Antonio On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Antonio Terceiro wrote: Well, I was not super happy with the wordingm, but those _are_ the licensing statements that exist in the upstream sources. Do you have any suggestion on how the text could be improved? I am good at detecting but not at rewording. Maybe

[DRE-maint] Bug#769463: ruby-fog-sakuracloud: missing dependency on ruby-fog-core

2014-11-13 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Package: ruby-fog-sakuracloud Version: 0.1.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 missing dependencies Dear Maintainer, Trying to load ruby-fog-sakuracloud in irb, the interactive Ruby interpreter yields the following: irb(main):001:0 require fog/sakuracloud LoadError: cannot load