Package: ruby-gir-ffi
Severity: normal
Failing tests was fixed in upstream repository. They should
be enabled at build time.
https://github.com/mvz/ruby-gir-ffi/issues/25
--
http://shelr.tv - screencasting for terminal
___
Excerpts from Lucas Nussbaum's message of Mon Jan 17 21:41:15 +0200 2011:
I think so, yes. All the docs refer to it, the new processes need to be
defined, etc, etc. For what benefit? OK, git is faster, and I prefer git
for new projects too.
It's easier to contribute and live in
Hello, All.
I cloned svn repo with git-svn and experimented a little bit.
Local repo size:
Git: 34M
SVN: 598M
WTF? 598MB and there is no local history?
Ok. I checked out topmost directory. Lets check trunk/
$ cd trunk
$ du -sh
84M
Much better, but:
- no history
- no light branches
- no my
I tried gem2deb created by Lucas and it was very useful!
It generates default control with ruby-anything package name...
Does this mean that we going to adapt python-like policy for
ruby packages?
What naming conventions should I use?
--
xmpp:s...@antono.info
http://antono.info/
Excerpts from Lucas Nussbaum's message of Mon Jan 17 20:30:56 +0200 2011:
svn-buildpackage wouldn't work with git.
That's a -1000 considering that our current workflow deeply relies on
svn-bp.
Ok. Let's think positive. What required in order to replace
svn-buildpackage with
Hello!
ant0no-guest
Its me. I going to package 2 tools:
- Glog: https://github.com/antono/glog
- Shellcast: https://github.com/red-brigade/shellcast
I personally interested in bugfixes for some annoying
libncurses-ruby bugs (#520374 and similar for 1.9.1).
I'll also try to bake package for
).
6) Trying to build package with debuild and patching fails
I need advice/comments on my workflow and help in updating dpatches.
Thank you in advance!
[1] https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-on-rails
--
Antono Vasiljev antono.vasil...@gmail.com
antono.info
.
|-- cleanup.sh
|-- libgems-build
