Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 860696 860683
Bug #860696 [src:ruby-spy] ruby-spy: FTBFS on i386: ERROR: Test "ruby2.3"
failed: SyntaxError:
/<>/debian/ruby-spy/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/spy/subroutine.rb:229:
syntax error, unexpected '-', expecting '|'
Unable to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 860683 src:ruby-spy
Bug #860683 [src:ruby-liquid] ruby-liquid: FTBFS on i386: ERROR: Test "ruby2.3"
failed: SyntaxError: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/spy/subroutine.rb:229: syntax
error, unexpected '-', expecting '|'
Bug reassigned from
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:50:38 -0300
with message-id <20170419185038.3cu7hjcyfutwy...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#860747: dh_ruby: please inject versioned dependency on
ruby metapackage
has caused the Debian Bug report #860747,
regarding dh_ruby: please inject versioned
Package: gem2deb
Version: 0.33.1
Severity: normal
Please have compiled Ruby extensions depend on compatible versions of
the ruby metapackage; for instance, an extension built only for 2.3
would depend on ruby (>= 2.3), ruby (<< 2.4), and an extension built
for both 2.3 and 2.4 would depend on
Christian Hofstaedtler writes:
> Looking at the m68k buildlogs for ruby-fast-xs ... the version of
> ruby-fast-xs installed as part of the telegram build was built for
> ruby2.2, but ruby itself was already ruby2.3. This just does not
> work.
Good point. I'd missed that
Hi, Antonio. Thanks for the quick response!
Antonio Terceiro writes:
> ruby-fast-xs is broken on m68k because it is a very old binary, from before
> this was implemented, and AFAICT it can't be built anymore because something
> else is not available.
The ruby-fast-xs
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #860747 {Done: Antonio Terceiro } [gem2deb] dh_ruby:
please inject versioned dependency on ruby metapackage
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #860747 to the same values
previously set
> reassign -1
Control: reopen -1
Control: reassign -1 ruby-all-dev
Control: retitle -1 ruby-all-dev: include upper bound on generated ruby
dependencies
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 03:53:57PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Hi, Antonio. Thanks for the quick response!
>
> Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-liquid
Version: 3.0.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418-i386 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in stretch on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Source: ruby-timers
Version: 4.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418-i386 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in stretch on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Source: ruby-seamless-database-pool
Version: 1.0.17-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418-i386 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in stretch on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
sid chroot),
Source: ruby-rspec
Version: 3.5.0c3e0m0s0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418-i386 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in stretch on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package
Source: ruby-net-ldap
Version: 0.12.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in stretch on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Source: ruby-awesome-print
Version: 1.6.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418-i386 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in stretch on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package
Source: ruby-spy
Version: 0.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418-i386 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in stretch on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:26:31 +0200
with message-id <20170419082631.ga44...@sx.intern.ewave.at>
and subject line Re: [DRE-maint] Bug#860512: ruby-ronn: fails on m68k (no
fast_xs)
has caused the Debian Bug report #860512,
regarding ruby-ronn: fails on m68k (no fast_xs)
to be marked
16 matches
Mail list logo