[DRE-maint] Bug#832247: blocked by bug #842855

Control: reopen -1 Control: fixed -1 origami-pdf/2.0.0-1 Control: block -1 by 842855 (This time with the correct control commands.) On 01-Nov-2016, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 09:18:10AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > > Thank you for fixing the source package. Which is the bug

[DRE-maint] Processed: Re: Bug#832247: blocked by bug #842855

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #832247 [origami-pdf] origami-pdf: Section should not be “ruby” Bug 832247 is not marked as done; doing nothing. > fixed -1 origami-pdf/2.0.0-1 Bug #832247 [origami-pdf] origami-pdf: Section should not be “ruby” Marked as fixed in versions

[DRE-maint] Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#832247: closed by Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org> (Bug#832247: fixed in origami-pdf 2.0.0-1)

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #832247 {Done: Antonio Terceiro } [origami-pdf] origami-pdf: Section should not be “ruby” 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add

[DRE-maint] Bug#832247: closed by Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org> (Bug#832247: fixed in origami-pdf 2.0.0-1)

Control: reopen -1 Control: block -1 by #842855 On 01-Nov-2016, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 09:18:10AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > > Thank you for fixing the source package. Which is the bug report > > for fixing the archive? > > #842855 Thank you. I've set this bug

[DRE-maint] Bug#832247: closed by Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org> (Bug#832247: fixed in origami-pdf 2.0.0-1)

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 09:18:10AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > On 28-Oct-2016, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > >* Change Section: to `utils` (Closes: #832247) > > Thank you for fixing the source package. Which is the bug report for > fixing the archive? #842855 signature.asc

[DRE-maint] ruby-github-markup_1.5.0+dfsg-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 23:09:41 +0530 Source: ruby-github-markup Binary: ruby-github-markup Architecture: source Version: 1.5.0+dfsg-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers

[DRE-maint] Processing of ruby-github-markup_1.5.0+dfsg-2_source.changes

ruby-github-markup_1.5.0+dfsg-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ruby-github-markup_1.5.0+dfsg-2.dsc ruby-github-markup_1.5.0+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Re: [DRE-maint] [PKG-Openstack-devel] Python3 and Lua bindings split out of the LXC packages

On 10/31/2016 11:23 PM, Evgeni Golov wrote: > Ohai, > > your package currently has a "Depends: lxc" in Debian. > > My short analysis told me that this is because that it uses one of the lxc-* > binaries we ship in there. If it is the case: carry on, happy hacking and > thanks for

[DRE-maint] Bug#842737: marked as done (ohai: FTBFS: Could not find 'addressable' (>= 0) among 31 total gem(s) (Gem::LoadError))

Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:19:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#842737: fixed in chef 12.14.60-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #842737, regarding ohai: FTBFS: Could not find 'addressable' (>= 0) among 31 total gem(s)

[DRE-maint] chef_12.14.60-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:59:34 -0200 Source: chef Binary: chef ruby-chef-config Architecture: source Version: 12.14.60-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers

[DRE-maint] Processing of chef_12.14.60-2_source.changes

chef_12.14.60-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: chef_12.14.60-2.dsc chef_12.14.60-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) ___

[DRE-maint] Processed: Re: Bug#842737: ohai: FTBFS: Could not find 'addressable' (>= 0) among 31 total gem(s) (Gem::LoadError)

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 ruby-chef-config Bug #842737 [src:ohai] ohai: FTBFS: Could not find 'addressable' (>= 0) among 31 total gem(s) (Gem::LoadError) Bug reassigned from package 'src:ohai' to 'ruby-chef-config'. No longer marked as found in versions ohai/8.21.0-1. Ignoring

[DRE-maint] Bug#842737: ohai: FTBFS: Could not find 'addressable' (>= 0) among 31 total gem(s) (Gem::LoadError)

Control: reassign -1 ruby-chef-config Control: found -1 12.14.60-1 Hi, thanks for the bug report On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 08:05:04PM +, Chris Lamb wrote: > >

[DRE-maint] Bug#839333: marked as done (ruby-prof: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.3" failed.)

Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:07:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#839333: fixed in ruby-prof 0.16.2+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #839333, regarding ruby-prof: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.3" failed. to be marked as done. This

[DRE-maint] ruby-prof_0.16.2+dfsg-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:24:40 +0530 Source: ruby-prof Binary: ruby-prof Architecture: source Version: 0.16.2+dfsg-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers

[DRE-maint] Processing of ruby-prof_0.16.2+dfsg-1_source.changes

ruby-prof_0.16.2+dfsg-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ruby-prof_0.16.2+dfsg-1.dsc ruby-prof_0.16.2+dfsg.orig.tar.gz ruby-prof_0.16.2+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

[DRE-maint] Bug#839333: ruby-prof: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.3" failed.

On Sat, 1 Oct 2016 10:41:49 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > amd64. I'm unable to reproduce it on a clean chroot, tests went fine during build with sbuild and during autopkgtest. signature.asc

Re: [DRE-maint] my packages maintainership

Hello, On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 09:43:46AM -0600, Joshua Timberman wrote: > I'd like to be removed as maintainer/uploader for the packages I once > maintained. I haven't touched any of these in years and I haven't been > involved in any kind of Debian/Ubuntu distribution packaging either.

[DRE-maint] ruby-sidekiq_4.2.3+dfsg-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:00:06 +0530 Source: ruby-sidekiq Binary: ruby-sidekiq Architecture: source Version: 4.2.3+dfsg-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers

[DRE-maint] Processing of ruby-sidekiq_4.2.3+dfsg-1_source.changes

ruby-sidekiq_4.2.3+dfsg-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ruby-sidekiq_4.2.3+dfsg-1.dsc ruby-sidekiq_4.2.3+dfsg.orig.tar.gz ruby-sidekiq_4.2.3+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

[DRE-maint] ruby-sentry-raven_2.1.2-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:05:52 +0530 Source: ruby-sentry-raven Binary: ruby-sentry-raven Architecture: source Version: 2.1.2-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers

[DRE-maint] Processing of ruby-sentry-raven_2.1.2-1_source.changes

ruby-sentry-raven_2.1.2-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ruby-sentry-raven_2.1.2-1.dsc ruby-sentry-raven_2.1.2.orig.tar.gz ruby-sentry-raven_2.1.2-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

[DRE-maint] my packages maintainership

Hey folks I'd like to be removed as maintainer/uploader for the packages I once maintained. I haven't touched any of these in years and I haven't been involved in any kind of Debian/Ubuntu distribution packaging either. coderay ohai ruby-mixlib-authentication ruby-mixlib-cli ruby-mixlib-config

Re: [DRE-maint] [Pkg-linaro-lava-devel] Python3 and Lua bindings split out of the LXC packages

On Tuesday 01 November 2016 03:53 AM, Evgeni Golov wrote: > your package currently has a "Depends: lxc" in Debian. > > My short analysis told me that this is because that it uses one of the lxc-* > binaries we ship in there. If it is the case: carry on, happy hacking and > thanks for

[DRE-maint] ruby-sprockets-es6_0.9.2-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 12:04:42 +0530 Source: ruby-sprockets-es6 Binary: ruby-sprockets-es6 Architecture: source Version: 0.9.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers

[DRE-maint] Processing of ruby-sprockets-es6_0.9.2-1_source.changes

ruby-sprockets-es6_0.9.2-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ruby-sprockets-es6_0.9.2-1.dsc ruby-sprockets-es6_0.9.2.orig.tar.gz ruby-sprockets-es6_0.9.2-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)