maintainers if SONAME bumps are missed
again ;-)...
There she goes !
Vincent, currently building the newer librmagick with test disabled.
Thank you very much for having a look at it!
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro
signature.asc
- Forwarded message from Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org -
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:38:11 -0300
From: Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
To: Vincent Fourmond fourm...@debian.org
Cc: Jérémy Lal je...@edagames.com, 557778-subscr...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: [DRE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:06:38 -0300
Source: libmocha-ruby
Binary: libmocha-ruby libmocha-ruby1.8
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
Maintainers
pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
Description:
librmagick-ruby - ImageMagick API for Ruby
librmagick-ruby-doc - ImageMagick API for Ruby (documentation)
librmagick-ruby1.8 - ImageMagick API for Ruby 1.8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:06:03 -0300
Source: libmocha-ruby
Binary: libmocha-ruby libmocha-ruby1.8
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
, then some solution could
be worked out with upstream.
--
Antonio Terceiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://people.softwarelivre.org/~terceiro/
GnuPG ID: 0F9CB28F
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
, somebody can resume ITP work).
Ah, yes, it's a good idea and can be done almost trivially. for
example with the just commited revision 616 :)
Nice, thank you very much! :)
--
Antonio Terceiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://people.softwarelivre.org/~terceiro/
GnuPG ID: 0F9CB28F
starts at [1].
Antonio Terceiro dijo [Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 01:15:50PM -0300]:
Hi all,
I was just wondering: since our QA report tool [1] supports listing
packages not in the repository yet as work in progress [2], why don't we
remove the packages-wip/ directory from our repository
that, what do you think?
[1] http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/qareport.cgi
[2] See pkg-perl's own QA report:
http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/qareport.cgi
--
Antonio Terceiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://people.softwarelivre.org/~terceiro/
GnuPG ID: 0F9CB28F
Package: libgd-ruby1.8
Version: 0.7.4.1-6
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When using interlace option, ruby segfaults:
--8-8---8--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ irb -rGD
image = GD::Image.new(100,100)
= #GD::Image:0x2b85b01eb9a8
://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-ruby-extras/packages/libcairo-ruby/branches/1.5.1-1+bug487204/
--
Antonio Terceiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://people.softwarelivre.org/~terceiro/
GnuPG ID: 0F9CB28F
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras
Paul van Tilburg escreveu isso aí:
libopenid-ruby 2.0.4 (Debian: 1.1.4-3)
Antionio, is 2.0 a big difference from 1.1? A different API maybe even?
Or can we just update this?
Yes, there is big difference, to the extent that a new package will be
needed.
--
Antonio Terceiro [EMAIL
301 - 312 of 312 matches
Mail list logo