[DRE-maint] Bug#557778: librmagick's little problems...

2010-01-08 Thread Antonio Terceiro
maintainers if SONAME bumps are missed again ;-)... There she goes ! Vincent, currently building the newer librmagick with test disabled. Thank you very much for having a look at it! -- Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro signature.asc

[DRE-maint] Bug#557778: Bug#557778: same problem here

2009-12-09 Thread Antonio Terceiro
- Forwarded message from Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org - Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:38:11 -0300 From: Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org To: Vincent Fourmond fourm...@debian.org Cc: Jérémy Lal je...@edagames.com, 557778-subscr...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: [DRE

[DRE-maint] Accepted libmocha-ruby 0.9.8-1 (source all)

2009-11-20 Thread Antonio Terceiro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:06:38 -0300 Source: libmocha-ruby Binary: libmocha-ruby libmocha-ruby1.8 Architecture: source all Version: 0.9.8-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org

[DRE-maint] Accepted librmagick-ruby 2.9.1-1 (source all amd64)

2009-04-25 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Maintainers pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org Description: librmagick-ruby - ImageMagick API for Ruby librmagick-ruby-doc - ImageMagick API for Ruby (documentation) librmagick-ruby1.8 - ImageMagick API for Ruby 1.8

[DRE-maint] Accepted libmocha-ruby 0.9.5-1 (source all)

2009-02-15 Thread Antonio Terceiro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:06:03 -0300 Source: libmocha-ruby Binary: libmocha-ruby libmocha-ruby1.8 Architecture: source all Version: 0.9.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org

Re: [DRE-maint] Packaging a module built with libinline-ruby

2008-09-22 Thread Antonio Terceiro
, then some solution could be worked out with upstream. -- Antonio Terceiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.softwarelivre.org/~terceiro/ GnuPG ID: 0F9CB28F ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http

Re: [DRE-maint] getting rid of packages-wip/ in our SVN repository

2008-09-16 Thread Antonio Terceiro
, somebody can resume ITP work). Ah, yes, it's a good idea and can be done almost trivially. for example with the just commited revision 616 :) Nice, thank you very much! :) -- Antonio Terceiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.softwarelivre.org/~terceiro/ GnuPG ID: 0F9CB28F

Re: [DRE-maint] getting rid of packages-wip/ in our SVN repository

2008-09-16 Thread Antonio Terceiro
starts at [1]. Antonio Terceiro dijo [Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 01:15:50PM -0300]: Hi all, I was just wondering: since our QA report tool [1] supports listing packages not in the repository yet as work in progress [2], why don't we remove the packages-wip/ directory from our repository

[DRE-maint] getting rid of packages-wip/ in our SVN repository

2008-09-13 Thread Antonio Terceiro
that, what do you think? [1] http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/qareport.cgi [2] See pkg-perl's own QA report: http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/qareport.cgi -- Antonio Terceiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.softwarelivre.org/~terceiro/ GnuPG ID: 0F9CB28F

[DRE-maint] Bug#497191: libgd-ruby1.8: interlace option segfaults on amd64

2008-08-30 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Package: libgd-ruby1.8 Version: 0.7.4.1-6 Severity: normal Tags: patch When using interlace option, ruby segfaults: --8-8---8-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ irb -rGD image = GD::Image.new(100,100) = #GD::Image:0x2b85b01eb9a8

[DRE-maint] Bug#487204: libcairo-ruby: backported fix from upstream CVS (was Bug#487204: Upstream)

2008-08-03 Thread Antonio Terceiro
://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-ruby-extras/packages/libcairo-ruby/branches/1.5.1-1+bug487204/ -- Antonio Terceiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.softwarelivre.org/~terceiro/ GnuPG ID: 0F9CB28F signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Pkg-ruby-extras

Re: [DRE-maint] Possible problems in your Debian packages

2008-06-02 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Paul van Tilburg escreveu isso aí: libopenid-ruby 2.0.4 (Debian: 1.1.4-3) Antionio, is 2.0 a big difference from 1.1? A different API maybe even? Or can we just update this? Yes, there is big difference, to the extent that a new package will be needed. -- Antonio Terceiro [EMAIL

<    1   2   3   4