Re: [DRE-maint] rbenv 4.0 ready for an upload.

[Joseph Herlant]

Hi Antonio,

A friend and I installed and tested the version of rbenv from your git repo.
Then installed and played with ruby 1.9.2, 2.0 from rbenv and it worked fine.
That's why I asked for this package release.

Best regards,
Joseph


On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org wrote:
 hi Joseph,

 On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:49:56PM +0100, Joseph Herlant wrote:
 Hi Antonio, hi Ruby extras maintainers,

 I see that the package rbenv version 4.0 has been fully prepared by
 Laurent Arnoud and Cédric Boutillier in the git repository in July. It
 also gets rid of lithian warnings about supported policy versions and
 obsolete DM-Upload-Allowed flag.

 Would it help if I build and upload the package to mentors and make a
 RFS to get it into Debian?

 not really. What will help is if you confirm you have tested that
 version and it works fine. Then feel free to ping me and I will
 upload it.

 Is someone already working on this?

 Thanks for any answer.

 Regards,

 Joseph

 --
 Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org

___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers

[DRE-maint] rbenv 4.0 ready for an upload.

[Joseph Herlant]

Hi Antonio, hi Ruby extras maintainers,

I see that the package rbenv version 4.0 has been fully prepared by
Laurent Arnoud and Cédric Boutillier in the git repository in July. It
also gets rid of lithian warnings about supported policy versions and
obsolete DM-Upload-Allowed flag.

Would it help if I build and upload the package to mentors and make a
RFS to get it into Debian?
Is someone already working on this?

Thanks for any answer.

Regards,

Joseph

___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers

Re: [DRE-maint] rbenv 4.0 ready for an upload.

[Joseph Herlant]

Great!

Many many thanks! ;-)

Regards,
Joseph


On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org wrote:
 On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:21:48PM +0100, Joseph Herlant wrote:
 Hi Antonio,

 A friend and I installed and tested the version of rbenv from your git repo.
 Then installed and played with ruby 1.9.2, 2.0 from rbenv and it worked fine.
 That's why I asked for this package release.

 Just uploaded, enjoy! :)

 --
 Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org

___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers

[DRE-maint] Bug#850357: nanoc: Move from asciidoc to asciidoc-base as build dependency

[Joseph Herlant]

Package: nanoc
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

Asciidoc has been split in different packages in #637006 and #729242.
This split has arrived in Testing.

To lower the number of dependencies to install during the build, could
you evaluate the switch of the build-depends from asciidoc to
asciidoc-base instead of asciidoc please?

asciidoc-base is enough to build manpages and html pages.

Thanks for your help,
Joseph

___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers

[DRE-maint] Bug#850360: ruby-mizuho: Move from asciidoc to asciidoc-base as build dependency

[Joseph Herlant]

Package: ruby-mizuho
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

Asciidoc has been split in different packages in #637006 and #729242.
This split has arrived in Testing.

To lower the number of dependencies to install during the build, could
you evaluate the switch of the build-depends from asciidoc to
asciidoc-base instead of asciidoc please?

asciidoc-base is enough to build manpages and html pages.

Thanks for your help,
Joseph

___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers

[DRE-maint] Bug#895188: asciidoctor: E-mail addresses are rendered twice [manpage backend]

[Joseph Herlant]

Hi,

I think this is due to the way the links are rendered in general.

To achieve your goal you would need to use the following:
mailto:debian.a...@manchmal.in-ulm.de[Christoph Biedl]

instead of:
Christoph Biedl 

See: https://asciidoctor.org/docs/asciidoc-syntax-quick-reference/#links

Is that acceptable?

Thanks
Joseph

___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers

[DRE-maint] Asciidoctor: I'd like to help

[Joseph Herlant]

Hi,

I'm the current maintainer of asciidoc in Debian and I'd like to help
maintaining the asciidoctor package (especially fixing the different
bugs that are blocking me on the EOL of asciidoc, transitioning to
asciidoctor).

Are there specifics to know related to this specific package I should
know? (Aside of requesting access to the ruby team in alioth)

Is the following documents the most up-to-date to align with the way
it has been packaged so far?
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging

Thanks for your reply,
Joseph

___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers

[DRE-maint] Bug#895613: asciidoctor FTBFS: test failures

[Joseph Herlant]

Thanks a lot for the quick answer! :)

> I can reproduce in a chroot with "dpkg-buildpackage -B"
> (there's likely some way to do the same in sbuild).

I'm now able to reproduce it with the following flags: `--arch-any
--no-arch-all`
I'll try to fix it this morning.

Thanks for the help!
Joseph

___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers

[DRE-maint] Bug#895613: asciidoctor FTBFS: test failures

[Joseph Herlant]

Hi Adrien,

Thanks for reporting. I was looking into it already.
My only problem is that I can't reproduce it when using sbuild in my
gbp buildpackage locally. I tried with different parameters but can't
understand why.
The missing files should have been installed by dh_install as they are
defined in ruby-asciidoc.install.
The only diff I see is that it runs dh binary-arch instead of dh binary.
Do you have the documentation of all the options you use on the buildd
environments please? I can't seem to find it.

Thanks for your help,
Joseph

___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers