[DRE-maint] ruby-gettext-i18n-rails-js_1.3.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please take care of: E: ruby-gettext-i18n-rails-js source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/gettext/jed.js line length is 2360 characters (>512) and mention all licenses/copyright information of vendor/assets/javascripts/gettext/jed.js in your debian/copyright. Thanks!

[DRE-maint] ruby-asciidoctor-plantuml_0.0.7-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, the copyright holder does not seem to match the Author. Is this intentionally? Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

[DRE-maint] ruby-openssl_2.0.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

requested by maintainer .. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] ruby-secure-headers_3.5.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please add all copyright holders to your debian/copyright, Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-string-direction_1.2.0-1_amd64.changes

Hi, I marked your package for accept, but: License: GPL-3 and the term or (at your option) any later version. in the license text do not really match. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] rubocop_0.47.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Miguel, according to README.md: rubocop-0.47.0/README.md:The logo is licensed under a rubocop-0.47.0/README.md:[Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en_GB). rubocop-0.47.0/README.md:Copyright (c) 2012-2017

[DRE-maint] rubocop_0.46.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

same as other version ... === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] schleuder-cli_0.0.1~beta13-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Georg, as the license of this software is only GPL-3, the term "or (at your option) any later version." should not be present in the corresponding license block of your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your

[DRE-maint] tdiary-style-gfm_0.4.0-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, according to tdiary-style-gfm-0.4.0/tdiary-style-gfm.gemspec the license is MIT!? Anyway, the GPL-3+ in your debian/copyright should be better only GPL-3. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you

[DRE-maint] tdiary-style-gfm_0.4.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

same as other version === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] ruby-prof_0.15.9+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please mention the files licensed under the Open Font License in your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

[DRE-maint] ruby-prof_0.15.9+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

as requested by mail ... === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] vagrant-sshfs_1.2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Hans, can you please explain why you say in your debian/copyright that this software is licensed under GPL-2+? All I found in the source tarball is a reference to GPL-2 only!? Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were

[DRE-maint] ruby-sys-filesystem_1.1.7-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, the software is licensed under Artistic 2.0, but in your debian/copyright you refer to the Artistic 1.0 license in /usr/share/common-licenses. I am afraid that does not match, so please add the Artistic 2 license text to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to

[DRE-maint] ruby-hamlit_2.5.0+debian-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, sorry, but: ruby-hamlit-2.5.0+debian/ext/hamlit/houdini/buffer.* seem to be licensed under GPL-2 and should be mentioned in your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new

[DRE-maint] ruby-hamlit_2.5.0+debian-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please mention ruby-hamlit-2.5.0+debian/ext/hamlit/houdini/buffer.* in your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

[DRE-maint] ruby-fog-azure_0.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, according to the file headers the copyright belongs to Microsoft and not to the authors. Can you please change your debian/copyright accordingly? Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-azure-core_0.1.2-1_amd64.changes

This package has the same Apache license issue .. Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers

[DRE-maint] ruby-jquery-datatables-rails_3.3.0.dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andrew, unfortunately I have to reject your package. The license of jquery-datatables-rails-3.3.0/app/assets/stylesheets/dataTables/extras/dataTables.tableTools.scss should be mentioned in your debian/copyright. Further the metadata of some pictures:

[DRE-maint] tdiary-theme_4.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. According to the file headers some files are licensed under Apache-2. Please mention them in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you

[DRE-maint] ruby-premailer_1.8.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, some files premailer-1.8.6/test/files/*.css: just contain a copyright but no license information: * Copyright (c) 2009 Dialect Communications Group (dialect.ca) Please check with upstream whether the BSD-3 license is also valid for them. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to

[DRE-maint] ruby-foreigner_1.7.4-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

as requested on irc === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] Bug#812103: CVE-2015-7519

Hi Linus, as others might be interested in the answer as well, I also send it to debian-lts@. On irc you wrote: 15:05 < Nirkus> have some old redmine running on squeeze-lts (yeah..) and since the update yesterday the following redmine code bails out with "private method `split' called for

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-rbpdf_1.19.0-1_amd64.changes

Hi Antonio, I marked the package for accept, but please add rbpdf-1.19.0/rbpdf-font/lib/fonts/ttf2ufm/* to the LGPL license block in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] ruby-sentry-raven_0.15.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, raven-ruby-0.15.3/lib/raven/okjson.rb is not licensed under Apache-2 Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

[DRE-maint] ruby-reek_3.8.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andrew, please mention the license of reek-3.8.2/spec/samples/redcloth.rb in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-minitar_0.5.4-1_amd64.changes

Hi Markus, I marked the package for accept, but according to README the software is dual licensed, so please mention the Ruby-license in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-thinking-sphinx_3.1.4-2_amd64.changes

Hi Andrew, your package depends on 'builder'. Can you please tell me where I can find this? Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

[DRE-maint] ruby-codemirror-rails_5.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andrew, please take care of these lintian errors: E: ruby-codemirror-rails source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/codemirror/modes/clojure.js E: ruby-codemirror-rails source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/codemirror/modes/cypher.js E: ruby-codemirror-rails

[DRE-maint] diff for passenger in Squeeze

Hi everybody, can someone please have a look at the diff for passenger=2.2.11debian-2 in Squeeze that should solve CVE-2015-7519[1] and nod? Thanks! Thorsten [1] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-7519 diff -Nru passenger-2.2.11debian/ext/apache2/Hooks.cpp

Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-email-reply-parser_0.5.8-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, Pirate Praveen wrote: Upstream has responded "They're both correct." Great, thanks alot for taking care of this. Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-state-machines-activerecord_0.3.0-1_amd64.changes

Hi, I marked your package for accept, but it would be great to add the correct copyright-years to your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

[DRE-maint] ruby-paranoia_2.1.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please use the license text from the LICENSE file in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

[DRE-maint] ruby-email-reply-parser_0.5.8-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please check with upstream whether the copyright holder from the LICENSE file or from metadata.yml is the correct one. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our

[DRE-maint] ruby-totoridipjp_0.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

as requested by email === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-json-schema_2.5.1-1_amd64.changes

Hi, I marked your package for accept, but please add the copyright holders of lib/json-schema/util/uuid.rb to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

[DRE-maint] ruby-minitest-utils_0.2.4+debian-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Neither in the source tarball, nor on the homepage I could find any license information for that package. So how do you know that it is licensed under Expat? Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-rails-assets-colorbox_1.6.3-1_amd64.changes

Hi, libjs-jquery-colorbox is already in the archive. So why don't you use that and maybe update it? Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-ridley_4.2.0-1_amd64.changes

Hi Miguel, I marked your package for accept, but please add Opscode Inc as a copyright holder for some files to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] ruby-saml_0.9.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, unfortunately you forgot some licenses in your debian/copyright. Please add: ruby-saml-0.9.2/lib/schemas/xmldsig-core-schema.xsd ruby-saml-0.9.2/lib/xml_security.rb Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or

[DRE-maint] ruby-binding-of-caller_0.7.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, I found files that are licensed under BSD-2. Other files are written by different authors but have no license information. Please clarify this with upstream. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you

[DRE-maint] ruby-debug-inspector_0.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please clarify the license of ext\debug_inspector\debug_inspector.c At least Yukihiro Matsumoto should appear in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which

[DRE-maint] ruby-diaspora-federation_0.0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Sorry, but policy says full text in debian/coypright. Pointers are only allowed to common-licenses. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

[DRE-maint] ruby-diaspora-federation-rails_0.0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Sorry, but policy says full text in debian/coypright. Pointers are only allowed to common-licenses. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

[DRE-maint] ruby-diaspora-federation_0.0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, unfortunately the AGPL does not belong to the licenses in /usr/share/common-licenses. So please add the full license text to your debian/copyright Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new

[DRE-maint] ruby-ace-rails-ap_3.0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please add the missing license of ace-rails-ap-3.0.3/vendor/assets/javascripts/ace/ace.js to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

[DRE-maint] ruby-diaspora-federation-rails_0.0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Sorry, same AGPL-reason as the other package ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers

[DRE-maint] ruby-open-graph-reader_0.5.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

same reason as other version === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] ruby-open-graph-reader_0.6.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi I would say that something containing this line: div class=copyrightCopyright 2014 a href=http://anticlown.com/;Anticlown Media/a. All rights reserved./div is not really suitable for main. So, please remove open_graph_reader-0.6.1/spec/fixtures/real_world/missing_title.html Thanks!

Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-rails-assets-highlightjs_8.6.0~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, Pirate Praveen wrote: added and uploaded. But I don't think giving full code is required. hmm, but it did not arrive here!? So as per the license requirement, giving a hyperlink to full text was enough. That is true, but policy 12.5 wants to have the verbatim

[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-assets-highlightjs_8.6.0~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, almost done, but the license of rails-assets-highlightjs-8.6.0~dfsg/app/assets/stylesheets/highlightjs/kimbie.* still seems to be missing. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files

[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-assets-highlightjs_8.6.0~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing licenses of app/assets/stylesheets/highlightjs/* to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-rqrcode-rails3_0.1.5-1_amd64.changes

Hi, I marked your package for accept, but you should add all copyright holders to your debian/copyright. Especially those from files in test/* are missing ... Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] squeeze update of rails?

of this update, it's not a problem, we will do our best with your package. Just let us know whether you would like to review and/or test the updated package before it gets released. Thank you very much. Thorsten Alteholz, on behalf of the Debian LTS team. PS: A member of the LTS team might start working

Re: [DRE-maint] squeeze update of rails?

On Sun, 5 Jul 2015, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: That doesn't make sense, rails is EOLed in squeeze... Oh, sorry for the noise, it seems to be too hot over here ... Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-backbone-on-rails_1.1.2.0-1_amd64.changes

Hi, I marked the package for accept, but you forgot to mention the copyright holders of vendor/assets/javascripts/* Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

[DRE-maint] ruby-backbone-on-rails_1.1.2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, as there is no progress here, I assume a typo in the Depends:-line. So please reupload a corrected version. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-cleanroom_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes

Hi Hleb, I marked your package for accept, but why did you do that lintian override? As you didn't close an ITP bug, the lintian warning is rather correct. Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] vagrant-lxc_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Antonio, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention the missing license of scripts/lxc-template in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding rexical_1.0.5-1_amd64.changes

Hi, I marked your package for accept, but please add the LGPL-2+ license of lib\rexical\generator.rb to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

[DRE-maint] ruby-simple-captcha2_0.3.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Neither on the website nor in the metadata I could find any license information. So this software does not seem to be distributable. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were

Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-backbone-on-rails_1.1.2.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

On Wed, 27 May 2015, Pirate Praveen wrote: This package has been in NEW for 6 months. Can you review this? Sure, I am waiting for two dependencies: ruby-jquety-rails and ruby-eco Can you please tell me where I can find them? (and the icing on the cake would be to mention the copyright

[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-assets-diaspora-jsxc_0.0.9~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention the dual license of jquery.slimscroll.js in your debian/copyright. strophe.disco.js just mentions a new copyright holder but no license. This needs to be clarified. Your package also depends on libjs-jsxc. Can you please tell

[DRE-maint] ruby-fog-terremark_0.0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

please reupload to experimental === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] ruby-fog-profitbricks_0.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

please reupload to experimental === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] diaspora-installer needs to go to contrib

Hi, as your package diaspora-installer downloads other stuff in postinst, it needs to go to contrib. Sorry, for overlooking this. Can you please reupload your package? Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-rails-assets-jquery-idletimer_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes

Dear Maintainer, I marked your package for accept, but some files are dual licensed under GPL as well. Please add those to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-assets-jquery.slimscroll_1.3.3~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing license of: app\assets~.slimscroll\examples\libs\prettify\prettify.js to your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were

[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-assets-jquery-fullscreen_1.1.4~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing license of: app\assets~avascripts\jquery-fullscreen\externs\jquery.js to your debian/copyight. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-mini-exiftool_2.5.0-1_amd64.changes

Dear Maintainer, I marked your package for accept, but as the license is pure LGPL2.1, the text or (at your option) any later version. in your debian/copyright is not correct. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-rails-admin_0.6.3~dfsg-1_amd64.changes

Hi, I marked your package for accept, but app/assets/stylesheets/rails_admin/bootstrap/responsive.scss app/assets/stylesheets/rails_admin/bootstrap/bootstrap.scss should be also added to your Apache license block. Thanks! Thorsten ___

Re: [DRE-maint] Comments regarding origami_1.2.7-1_amd64.changes

Hi Antonio On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Antonio Terceiro wrote: Well, I was not super happy with the wordingm, but those _are_ the licensing statements that exist in the upstream sources. Do you have any suggestion on how the text could be improved? I am good at detecting but not at rewording. Maybe

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-d3-rails_3.4.13+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

Dear Maintainer, this package seems to be rather empty. Would it be possible to add the contents to another package? Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

[DRE-maint] ruby-patron_0.4.18-2_i386.changes REJECTED

as requested by zeha === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-uuid_2.3.7-1_amd64.changes

Hi, all files *.rb say in their header: License:: MIT and/or Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike which looks rather strange. Can you please ask upstream what is meant by this and or or? Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers

[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-admin_0.6.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing licenses of files in spec/* to your debian/copyright. I found at least SIL OFL 1.1, Apache, Expat or GPL in it. Or maybe you can just remove the directory from the source tarball. Thanks! Thorsten ===

[DRE-maint] ruby-ftw_0.0.39-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

as requested by sponsor === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] ruby-sidekiq_3.2.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package again. The files ./web/assets/javascripts/application.js ./web/assets/javascripts/dashboard.js are still only available in the minified version, which is not the preferred form for modification. Thorsten === Please feel free

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding rhc_1.30.2-1_amd64.changes

Dear Maintainer, I marked your package for accept, but please mention all copyright holders in your debian/coypright, for example James Miller from lib/rhc/vendor/sshkey.rb. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-request-store_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes

Dear Maintainer, this is a rather small package. The size of the Expat license information is greater than the code size. Wouldn't it be possible to group this stuff with something else? Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] ruby-sidekiq_3.2.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. There are several minified files without source in directory web (e.g. bootstrap.css). Further the licenses of these minified files are not mentioned in debian/copyright. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this

[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-admin_0.6.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, please update your debian/copyright. I found files under an Apache license and Dual licensed under the MIT and GPL licenses, which are not mentioned. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if

Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-entypo-rails_2.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Pirate Praveen wrote: In debian/copyright you mention CC BY 3.0 and SIL Open Font License but you did not add the license text itself. I have added a link to OFL license, I hope that is enough (source itself doesn't contain the full text). No, I am afraid this is not

[DRE-maint] ruby-entypo-rails_2.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

explained in other email === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] ruby-font-awesome-rails_4.0.3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, please add the complete text of OFL to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

[DRE-maint] ruby-celluloid-io_0.15.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing license of lib/celluloid/io/stream.rb to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-semverse_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes

Dear Maintainer, can you please explain why LICENSE.txt says the license is Expat but metadata.yml and semverse.gemspec tell something about Apache 2. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] ruby-kramdown-rfc2629_1.0.13-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention the licenses of lib/kramdown-rfc2629.rb in debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which

[DRE-maint] ruby-semverse_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

old version with wrong license information === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] ruby-nested-form_0.3.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing license of nested-form-0.3.2\spec\dummy\app\assets\javascripts\jquery.js to debian/copyright. Are you sure that you want to distribute nested-form-0.3.2\spec\dummy\tmp\cache\* in the source tarball?

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-client-side-validations_3.2.6+gh-1_amd64.changes

Hi Praveen, I marked your package for accept but please add the dual license of client_side_validations-3.2.6\test\javascript\public\vendor\jquery.metadata.js client_side_validations-3.2.6\test\javascript\public\vendor\qunit.js to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten

[DRE-maint] ruby-source-map_3.0.1+git.20120229.bda06a3f-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing BSD license of ruby-source_map-master\lib\source_map\vlq.rb to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or

[DRE-maint] ruby-minitest-stub-const_0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Your debian/copyright needs some rework. In addition can you please tell me why this package is needed in Debian. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were

[DRE-maint] ruby-entypo-rails_2.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. In debian/copyright you mention CC BY 3.0 and SIL Open Font License but you did not add the license text itself. All *.svg files contain a line: Copyright (C) 2012 by original authors @ fontello.com Can you please explain why

[DRE-maint] ruby-sinon-rails_1.4.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. The license information of: ruby-sinon-rails-1.4.2.1\vendor\assets\javascripts\sinon.js is missing in debian/coypright. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were

[DRE-maint] ruby-em-mongo_0.5.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. According to debian/copyright the license is Expat. According to some file headers is Apache-2.0. Can you please clarify the license status? Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand

[DRE-maint] ruby-http_0.5.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the license of ruby-http-0.5.0\lib\http\uri_backport.rb to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new

[DRE-maint] ruby-re2_0.5.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject you package. The text in LICENSE.TXT does not correspond with the text in debian/copyright. Please adjust debian/copyright accordingly. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were