On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:03:46AM -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> > * the second one is that librmagick-ruby is very easily broken by
> > newer versions of imagemagick, which is actually very hard to track.
> > This will need some thinking; possibly a solution would be a strict
> > versioned
> * the second one is that librmagick-ruby is very easily broken by
> newer versions of imagemagick, which is actually very hard to track.
> This will need some thinking; possibly a solution would be a strict
> versioned dependency along if only binNMUs for each imagemagick
> release ?
What
