[DRE-maint] RFS libsinatra-ruby_0.9.3-1 or sinatra_0.9.3-1

2009-07-22 Thread Laurent Vallar
Hi, On Wed,Jul,22,2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On Mon,Jul,20,2009, Paul van Tilburg wrote: [...] If a lib is called libfoo-ruby, one always has to wonder whether the source package is libfoo-ruby, foo-ruby, ruby-foo, rfoo, foo4r, etc. I know one can do some queries to find out the

Re: [DRE-maint] RFS libsinatra-ruby_0.9.3-1 or sinatra_0.9.3-1

2009-07-22 Thread Paul van Tilburg
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:46:46PM +0200, Laurent Vallar wrote: On Wed,Jul,22,2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: I think that what Paul means is that he would prefer the source package name to be libsinatra-ruby, not just sinatra. Indeed. I don't have a preference for one or the other solution.

Re: [DRE-maint] RFS libsinatra-ruby_0.9.3-1 or sinatra_0.9.3-1

2009-07-22 Thread Paul van Tilburg
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 03:22:38PM -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote: On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:55:12PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg wrote: On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:46:46PM +0200, Laurent Vallar wrote: Do i have to change SVN directory name too (i.e. doing a 'svn move sinatra libsinatra-ruby' in