Paul van Tilburg escreveu isso aí:
libopenid-ruby 2.0.4 (Debian: 1.1.4-3)
Antionio, is 2.0 a big difference from 1.1? A different API maybe even?
Or can we just update this?
Yes, there is big difference, to the extent that a new package will be
needed.
--
Antonio Terceiro [EMAIL
://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-ruby-extras/packages/libcairo-ruby/branches/1.5.1-1+bug487204/
--
Antonio Terceiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://people.softwarelivre.org/~terceiro/
GnuPG ID: 0F9CB28F
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras
Package: libgd-ruby1.8
Version: 0.7.4.1-6
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When using interlace option, ruby segfaults:
--8-8---8--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ irb -rGD
image = GD::Image.new(100,100)
= #GD::Image:0x2b85b01eb9a8
that, what do you think?
[1] http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/qareport.cgi
[2] See pkg-perl's own QA report:
http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/qareport.cgi
--
Antonio Terceiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://people.softwarelivre.org/~terceiro/
GnuPG ID: 0F9CB28F
, somebody can resume ITP work).
Ah, yes, it's a good idea and can be done almost trivially. for
example with the just commited revision 616 :)
Nice, thank you very much! :)
--
Antonio Terceiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://people.softwarelivre.org/~terceiro/
GnuPG ID: 0F9CB28F
starts at [1].
Antonio Terceiro dijo [Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 01:15:50PM -0300]:
Hi all,
I was just wondering: since our QA report tool [1] supports listing
packages not in the repository yet as work in progress [2], why don't we
remove the packages-wip/ directory from our repository
, then some solution could
be worked out with upstream.
--
Antonio Terceiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://people.softwarelivre.org/~terceiro/
GnuPG ID: 0F9CB28F
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:06:03 -0300
Source: libmocha-ruby
Binary: libmocha-ruby libmocha-ruby1.8
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
Maintainers
pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
Description:
librmagick-ruby - ImageMagick API for Ruby
librmagick-ruby-doc - ImageMagick API for Ruby (documentation)
librmagick-ruby1.8 - ImageMagick API for Ruby 1.8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:06:38 -0300
Source: libmocha-ruby
Binary: libmocha-ruby libmocha-ruby1.8
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
- Forwarded message from Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org -
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:38:11 -0300
From: Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
To: Vincent Fourmond fourm...@debian.org
Cc: Jérémy Lal je...@edagames.com, 557778-subscr...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: [DRE
maintainers if SONAME bumps are missed
again ;-)...
There she goes !
Vincent, currently building the newer librmagick with test disabled.
Thank you very much for having a look at it!
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro
signature.asc
rake-0.8.7
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:59:44 -0300
Source: libopenid-ruby
Binary: libopenid-ruby libopenid-ruby1.8
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.1.8debian-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Antonio Terceiro terce
!
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
... the
problem is a broken upstream build system.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
the previous package was not removed yet ...
I should report a bug soon.
In the mean time, I'm sponsoring this upload. (sorry if I'm being
intrusive).
On the contrary, thank you very much.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro
signature.asc
Description
you have a look at that ?
No, I didn't notice.
According to the logs on buildd.d.o, something fails during the
extconf.rb phase. I don't have access to non-intel hardware to test, but
I will install a kfreebsd VM and try since it also fails there.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
Hello,
Michal Suchanek escreveu isso aí:
People on ruby-gnome2 list suggest gio2 for I/O but this is not
avaialble in the Debian package.
This is being worked on. You should expect an upload of a new version of
ruby-gnome2 in a few weeks.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
http
that instead?
(Any missing build dependencies are also available under pkg-ruby-extras/)
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
tag 583901 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The newest upstream release of ruby-gnome2 is being worked on. It will
drop the gnome-vfs binding as well as the dependency on gnome-vfs.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro
signature.asc
Description: Digital
/ruby/vendor_ruby/pkg-config.rb:233:in `parse_pc': .pc for fontconfig
doesn't exist. (RuntimeError)
The problem is caused by ruby-pkg-config, which at the moment only
supports i386 and amd64. I've already identified the problem and will
upload a fixed version soon.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce
Vincent Fourmond escreveu isso aí:
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Antonio Terceiro
In the file /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/dh_ruby.rb, it gets argv
from the caller, but does not pull the installation directory from
there. Rather, it sets package to the result
packaging helper, so ideally all other Ruby packages
should depend on it. The problem with breaking these dependencies is that
we would have second class Ruby packages that cannot use the standard
build tools because they are build dependencies of the build tool
itself.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce
`), and then builds for 1.9 in the same
directory. This all happens before the tests are run, so when you add
ext/mri to the $LOAD_PATH in the test file, it only contains a 1.9
.so, and that's why the 1.8 tests segfault.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro
and allows maintainers to tell gem2deb to use the directory
passed by dh_auto_install.
See a56b6bdf for the implementation and 3092732e for some documentation:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ruby-extras/gem2deb.git;a=summary
Suggestions and patches are welcome.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen escreveu isso aí:
Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org writes:
Actually I've implemented this in a way that the existing packages
will not break and allows maintainers to tell gem2deb to use the
directory passed by dh_auto_install.
That looks like a much
the suite.
Please
update your programs to use Gtk::StatusIcon instead of Gtk::TrayIcon!
-- Paul van Tilburg pau...@debian.org, Thu, 24 Mar 2007 08:28:24 +0200
+
+This package now also replaces ruby-glade2 and ruby-gconf.
Would you like to elaborate?
--
Antonio Terceiro terce
.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras
...@opscode.com
Changed-By: Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
Description:
coderay- Helper programs for CodeRay Ruby lib for syntax highlighting
libcoderay-ruby - Transitional package for coderay
libcoderay-ruby1.8 - Transitional package for coderay
ruby-coderay - Ruby library for syntax
to avoid building the build-dependencies with gem2deb itself.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
run against the installed code.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
On 20/08/11 at 12:50 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
Package: gem2deb
Version: 0.2.6
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
It would be great if gem2deb made it easier to create packages that can
be tested by autopkgtest
will need to add the appropriate binary package stanzas
to debian/control, and check the dependencies for each sub-package, and
make sure the tests for all of them are run during package build.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
one month ago:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2011/07/msg00049.html
That message contained all the whats, whys and hows, but unfortunately
we only got a reply for 1 out of the 5 affected packages.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
?
In the case of glade, for example, Gtk::Builder can load the .glade files, so
the source must be adjusted to use that instead of the glade bindings.
Other possibility is packages depending on stuff they don't actually need, so
each package in question needs to be checked individually.
--
Antonio
. You can even move your upload to DELAYED/0, or
upload directly to incoming, if you want.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
it be safely removed? If not, I'm
not sure how to proceed, perhaps asking upstream to remove license
notice would fit the clauses listed in the second paragraph.
It is required to the operation of the library.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras
The build is still failing in some architectures. I have reopened this
bug and will investigate the problem.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby
on these OSes.
Given they both use GNU libc, we can use the same way (endian.h)
used for the Linux case already; this is what the attached patch does.
There is actually a few more portability issues there. I already pushed
some patches upstream and will package a git snapshot soon.
--
Antonio
')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby
Mehdi Dogguy escreveu isso aí:
On 21/09/2011 00:18, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Package: ruby-ffi
Severity: serious
Can you please mention the version and suite in which this bug exists?
Otherwise, this bug's metadata is incomplete and makes Stable Release
Managers (and people looking
Syntax OK
Syntax OK
Syntax OK
Syntax OK
Syntax OK
Syntax OK
Syntax OK
Syntax OK
Syntax OK
Syntax OK
Syntax OK
This would make sure all code has proper syntax, at least for the Ruby versions
the package claims to support.
What do you guys think about this?
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
1.8 is not
changing anymore, I am marking this bug as wontfix.
If you want to have proper threading with GTK Ruby programs, you should
be using Ruby 1.9. This will be the default Ruby on Debian really soon.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
of how to implement this on
the gem2deb side, we will totally consider it.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
Description:
libatk1-ruby - Transitional package for ruby-atk
libatk1-ruby1.8 - Transitional package for ruby-atk
, then. :-)
BTW ruby-gnome2 would not benefit from this change because it does not
use gem2deb.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
is only the first step.
After that you need to start a new changelog entry -- because the fixed
package must be a different version -- and upload the package.
I have uploaded a new version of ruby-rdiscount. Please review the last
2 commits in the master branch.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
`
The deprecation message is just a warning. The real problem is
uninitialized constant Gem, which is a bug in the package.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
ruby /dev/null which gem /dev/null; then
PATH=$(ruby -rubygems -e 'puts Gem.user_dir')/bin:$PATH
fi
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby
-based packages such as
ruby-dataobjects-sqlite3. Could you please take a look?
This will be fixed in a gem2deb upload really soon now.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
from running the test script against both
ruby1.8 and ruby1.9.1 (a second run, after having the C code built to
remove unecessary cruft): they have similar results.
Please keep me and the bug report in Cc:
Thanks,
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital
are only available to that interpreter.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi
there is not much we can do to stop the program installed
from runninnd under ruby1.8
rbenv can only help you (with the approach I proposed in the previous
message) if you call `gem` and without sudo.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Jurij,
Jurij Smakov escreveu isso aí:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:54:07AM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Dear sparc porters,
I need some help from you to make ruby-ffi build correctly on sparc.
The source actually compiles OK, but the test suite crashes with an
Illegal instruction
@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
Description:
capistrano - Executes commands in parallel on multiples servers
Changes:
capistrano (2.9.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release.
* Package being adopted by the Debian Ruby team.
* Package migrated
! With your patch the package builds fine (including passing
the entire test suite on both Ruby 1.8 and 1.9).
Thank you very much for your help with this. :-)
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby
in copy)
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
ruby-ffi-test-ia64.rb
Description: application/ruby
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
, got 2.90211670708434e-102
Expected 2.7, got 2.90085606709136e-102
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
ruby-ffi-test-armhf.rb
Description: application/ruby
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Adam D. Barratt escreveu isso aí:
severity 656809 important
thanks
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 19:28 -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Source: ruby-ffi
Severity: grave
Justification: fails to build from source
No. The correct severity for a FTBFS would be serious in the majority
of cases
can help with
investigating this.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi
of this).
Thanks for reporting.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman
information
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg
wins. ;-)
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg
Theo Cushion escreveu isso aí:
On 14 Feb 2012, at 16:50, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Theo Cushion escreveu isso aí:
Hi,
I'm in the process of back porting Ruby 1.9.3 from Precise to Lucid.
My aim is to get Passenger running using Ruby 1.9.3 on Lucid with
nginx. However, I've run
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras
transitions to ruby-setup, which
allows any version of ruby
Thanks for your report.
However, ruby-pkg-tools is deprecated and is very unlikely that we will
change anything on it anymore.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro
signature.asc
Description
-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
Description:
libohai-ruby - Transitional package for ohai
libohai-ruby1.8 - Transitional package for ohai
ohai - Detects data about your operating system and reports it in JSON
ohai-doc - Transitional
your copyright file.
Oh, crap, I make the binary package reference the JS files provided by
the libjs-* packages but forgot that they are in the source package
anyway.
debian/copyright adjusted and uploaded, thanks!
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital
for spotting that. This
compressed JavaScript thing is really a PITA.
I guess you skipped ruby-coffee-script and ruby-coffee-rails because
they depend on this, right? Could you please fasttrack this package plus
those other two?
Thanks for you work!
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
Description:
capistrano - Executes commands in parallel on multiple servers
Closes: 655389
Changes:
capistrano (2.12.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release.
* Fix typo in the short description (Closes: #655389
-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
Description:
libohai-ruby - Transitional package for ohai
libohai-ruby1.8 - Transitional package for ohai
ohai - Detects data about your operating system and reports it in JSON
ohai-doc - Transitional
reassign 674810 rails
found 674810 2.3.14.1
fixed 674810 2:2.3.14.2
thanks
This bug was fixed in the rails package, so I am reassigning it.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras
.
The fixed package is on git:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-mysql.git;a=commitdiff;h=86f0e699f562857287d21a8e288811553b7c64ae
I can upload this fix, if you agree.
But for Jessie (Wheezy+1), I am all for droping ruby-mysql and doing
what you suggested.
--
Antonio Terceiro
-3464 has to be split between ruby-actionpack-3.2
and ruby-activesupport-3.2.
I am working on this, expect uploads RSN.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg
in advance for your insights.
Cédric
I requested the installation of the build deps for ruby-gherkin in a
armhf porterbox to be able to investigate. This far into the freeze,
it's very unlikely that we will get this newer ruby-gherkin and the
newer cucumber into wheezy, though.
--
Antonio
and will stop working [1],
I think that gem2deb should no longer add it to the initial version
of the debian/control file.
Makes sense - I just did it in the git repo, but that won't be uploaded
before wheezy is out.
Thanks for the heads up.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
Francesco Poli escreveu:
I think you should use the
Control: tags -1 + pending
syntax, unless you Bcc the control bot...
I just forgot to Bcc: control@ - just bounced the original message to
there :-)
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
: 3.2.11, 3.1.10, 3.0.19, 2.3.15
snip
This probably affects squeeze and wheezy too. Please contact me in case you
need any help!
Yes, this affects both squeeze and wheezy, but on different packages. A
fix for wheezy is under way, and wheezy will follow.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce
rails from stable should not be affected, but please double-check.
The fix for this is actually spread over two packages, so I am cloning
this bug to the other one. Thanks for reporting.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the
vulnerability?
All of the Rails packages in Debian are properly updated with the fixes
for the recently disclosed vulnerabilities.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
will be updating it shortly to the latest version without
the
vulnerability?
All of the Rails packages in Debian are properly updated with the fixes
for the recently disclosed vulnerabilities.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
Antonio thanks for your reply.
But when
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 03:17:17PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Besides, since rails3 is a meta package which depends on the packages
for the various components of Rails, and the fixes for those security
problems were in their respective components, so no upgrade of the
rails3 package itself
cloning this bug to that package as well.
Thanks,
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
-rdiscount 1.6.8-3
ii ruby-redcloth 4.2.9-2
-- no debconf information
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
to reproduce this in an empty Redmine
installation?
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
Uploaders field in
debian/control or changed by line in debian/changelog
I works for me as well.
Can you reproduce the problem in a clean environment (i.e. a clean user
account, or a clean chroot)?
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
` to depend on the rails 4 components.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin
, but
feel free to ping after some time if you don't see any updates.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
Control: tag -1 unreproducible
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:15:48PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org writes:
hurd-i386 is not a release architecture, so this bug cannot have a
severity that high.
Oops, sorry, I keep forgetting to override reportbug when
of question since in Ruby 1.9 Rubygems is part
of Ruby itself.
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
Are you going to upload 0.6.4? Can I?
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org
of packages ruby-rack depends on:
ii ruby 1:1.9.3
ii ruby1.8 [ruby-interpreter]1.8.7.358-7
ii ruby1.9.1 [ruby-interpreter] 1.9.3.194-8.1+b1
ruby-rack recommends no packages.
ruby-rack suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Antonio Terceiro terce
1 - 100 of 312 matches
Mail list logo
