...@debian.org wrote:
hi Joseph,
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:49:56PM +0100, Joseph Herlant wrote:
Hi Antonio, hi Ruby extras maintainers,
I see that the package rbenv version 4.0 has been fully prepared by
Laurent Arnoud and Cédric Boutillier in the git repository in July. It
also gets rid
Hi Antonio, hi Ruby extras maintainers,
I see that the package rbenv version 4.0 has been fully prepared by
Laurent Arnoud and Cédric Boutillier in the git repository in July. It
also gets rid of lithian warnings about supported policy versions and
obsolete DM-Upload-Allowed flag.
Would it help
Great!
Many many thanks! ;-)
Regards,
Joseph
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:21:48PM +0100, Joseph Herlant wrote:
Hi Antonio,
A friend and I installed and tested the version of rbenv from your git repo.
Then installed
Package: nanoc
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Asciidoc has been split in different packages in #637006 and #729242.
This split has arrived in Testing.
To lower the number of dependencies to install during the build, could
you evaluate the switch of the build-depends from asciidoc to
Package: ruby-mizuho
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Asciidoc has been split in different packages in #637006 and #729242.
This split has arrived in Testing.
To lower the number of dependencies to install during the build, could
you evaluate the switch of the build-depends from asciidoc to
Hi,
I think this is due to the way the links are rendered in general.
To achieve your goal you would need to use the following:
mailto:debian.a...@manchmal.in-ulm.de[Christoph Biedl]
instead of:
Christoph Biedl
See:
Hi,
I'm the current maintainer of asciidoc in Debian and I'd like to help
maintaining the asciidoctor package (especially fixing the different
bugs that are blocking me on the EOL of asciidoc, transitioning to
asciidoctor).
Are there specifics to know related to this specific package I should
Thanks a lot for the quick answer! :)
> I can reproduce in a chroot with "dpkg-buildpackage -B"
> (there's likely some way to do the same in sbuild).
I'm now able to reproduce it with the following flags: `--arch-any
--no-arch-all`
I'll try to fix it this morning.
Thanks for the help!
Joseph
Hi Adrien,
Thanks for reporting. I was looking into it already.
My only problem is that I can't reproduce it when using sbuild in my
gbp buildpackage locally. I tried with different parameters but can't
understand why.
The missing files should have been installed by dh_install as they are
defined