[DRE-maint] diaspora-installer needs to go to contrib

Hi, as your package diaspora-installer downloads other stuff in postinst, it needs to go to contrib. Sorry, for overlooking this. Can you please reupload your package? Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-

Re: [DRE-maint] diaspora-installer needs to go to contrib

On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Pirate Praveen wrote: Do I have to upload to contrib even if all the components are free software? It just needs more time to package all the software it downloads. Yes, as soon as your package downloads something not in the archive, it has to go to contrib. Thorsten

[DRE-maint] ruby-fog-terremark_0.0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

please reupload to experimental === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-ma

[DRE-maint] ruby-fog-profitbricks_0.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

please reupload to experimental === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-ma

[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-assets-diaspora-jsxc_0.0.9~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention the dual license of jquery.slimscroll.js in your debian/copyright. strophe.disco.js just mentions a new copyright holder but no license. This needs to be clarified. Your package also depends on libjs-jsxc. Can you please tell m

Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-backbone-on-rails_1.1.2.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

On Wed, 27 May 2015, Pirate Praveen wrote: This package has been in NEW for 6 months. Can you review this? Sure, I am waiting for two dependencies: ruby-jquety-rails and ruby-eco Can you please tell me where I can find them? (and the icing on the cake would be to mention the copyright holder

[DRE-maint] ruby-simple-captcha2_0.3.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Neither on the website nor in the metadata I could find any license information. So this software does not seem to be distributable. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected,

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding rexical_1.0.5-1_amd64.changes

Hi, I marked your package for accept, but please add the LGPL-2+ license of lib\rexical\generator.rb to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://

[DRE-maint] vagrant-lxc_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Antonio, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention the missing license of scripts/lxc-template in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which

[DRE-maint] ruby-backbone-on-rails_1.1.2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, as there is no progress here, I assume a typo in the Depends:-line. So please reupload a corrected version. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-cleanroom_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes

Hi Hleb, I marked your package for accept, but why did you do that lintian override? As you didn't close an ITP bug, the lintian warning is rather correct. Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.ali

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-backbone-on-rails_1.1.2.0-1_amd64.changes

Hi, I marked the package for accept, but you forgot to mention the copyright holders of vendor/assets/javascripts/* Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debia

[DRE-maint] squeeze update of rails?

this update, it's not a problem, we will do our best with your package. Just let us know whether you would like to review and/or test the updated package before it gets released. Thank you very much. Thorsten Alteholz, on behalf of the Debian LTS team. PS: A member of the LTS team might sta

Re: [DRE-maint] squeeze update of rails?

On Sun, 5 Jul 2015, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: That doesn't make sense, rails is EOLed in squeeze... Oh, sorry for the noise, it seems to be too hot over here ... Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-rqrcode-rails3_0.1.5-1_amd64.changes

Hi, I marked your package for accept, but you should add all copyright holders to your debian/copyright. Especially those from files in test/* are missing ... Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers

[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-assets-highlightjs_8.6.0~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing licenses of app/assets/stylesheets/highlightjs/* to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files

[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-assets-highlightjs_8.6.0~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, almost done, but the license of rails-assets-highlightjs-8.6.0~dfsg/app/assets/stylesheets/highlightjs/kimbie.* still seems to be missing. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files whic

[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-assets-highlightjs_8.6.0~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

*sigh* as this license does not appear in /usr/share/common-licenses others add the complete license text of CC-BY-SA to their debian/copyright Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which

Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-rails-assets-highlightjs_8.6.0~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, Pirate Praveen wrote: added and uploaded. But I don't think giving full code is required. hmm, but it did not arrive here!? So as per the license requirement, giving a hyperlink to full text was enough. That is true, but policy 12.5 wants to have the verbatim version

[DRE-maint] ruby-open-graph-reader_0.5.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

same reason as other version === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maint

[DRE-maint] ruby-open-graph-reader_0.6.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi I would say that something containing this line: Copyright 2014 http://anticlown.com/";>Anticlown Media. All rights reserved. is not really suitable for main. So, please remove open_graph_reader-0.6.1/spec/fixtures/real_world/missing_title.html Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to re

[DRE-maint] ruby-diaspora-federation-rails_0.0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Sorry, same AGPL-reason as the other package ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers ma

[DRE-maint] ruby-diaspora-federation_0.0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, unfortunately the AGPL does not belong to the licenses in /usr/share/common-licenses. So please add the full license text to your debian/copyright Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new fil

[DRE-maint] ruby-ace-rails-ap_3.0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please add the missing license of ace-rails-ap-3.0.3/vendor/assets/javascripts/ace/ace.js to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

[DRE-maint] ruby-diaspora-federation-rails_0.0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Sorry, but policy says full text in debian/coypright. Pointers are only allowed to common-licenses. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___

[DRE-maint] ruby-diaspora-federation_0.0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Sorry, but policy says full text in debian/coypright. Pointers are only allowed to common-licenses. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

[DRE-maint] ruby-debug-inspector_0.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please clarify the license of ext\debug_inspector\debug_inspector.c At least Yukihiro Matsumoto should appear in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which ad

[DRE-maint] ruby-binding-of-caller_0.7.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, I found files that are licensed under BSD-2. Other files are written by different authors but have no license information. Please clarify this with upstream. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you up

[DRE-maint] ruby-saml_0.9.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, unfortunately you forgot some licenses in your debian/copyright. Please add: ruby-saml-0.9.2/lib/schemas/xmldsig-core-schema.xsd ruby-saml-0.9.2/lib/xml_security.rb Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-ridley_4.2.0-1_amd64.changes

Hi Miguel, I marked your package for accept, but please add Opscode Inc as a copyright holder for some files to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

[DRE-maint] ruby-minitest-utils_0.2.4+debian-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Neither in the source tarball, nor on the homepage I could find any license information for that package. So how do you know that it is licensed under Expat? Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-rails-assets-colorbox_1.6.3-1_amd64.changes

Hi, libjs-jquery-colorbox is already in the archive. So why don't you use that and maybe update it? Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mai

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-json-schema_2.5.1-1_amd64.changes

Hi, I marked your package for accept, but please add the copyright holders of lib/json-schema/util/uuid.rb to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org ht

[DRE-maint] ruby-jquery-datatables-rails_3.3.0.dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andrew, unfortunately I have to reject your package. The license of jquery-datatables-rails-3.3.0/app/assets/stylesheets/dataTables/extras/dataTables.tableTools.scss should be mentioned in your debian/copyright. Further the metadata of some pictures: jquery-datatables-rails-3.3.0/app/asset

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-azure_0.7.5-1_amd64.changes

Hi Sagar, I marked your package for accept, but you should not include the complete license text of the Apache license in your debian/copyright. The pointer to /usr/share/common-licenses is sufficient. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintain

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-azure-core_0.1.2-1_amd64.changes

This package has the same Apache license issue .. Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers

[DRE-maint] ruby-fog-azure_0.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, according to the file headers the copyright belongs to Microsoft and not to the authors. Can you please change your debian/copyright accordingly? Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new file

[DRE-maint] ruby-hamlit_2.5.0+debian-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please mention ruby-hamlit-2.5.0+debian/ext/hamlit/houdini/buffer.* in your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

[DRE-maint] ruby-hamlit_2.5.0+debian-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, sorry, but: ruby-hamlit-2.5.0+debian/ext/hamlit/houdini/buffer.* seem to be licensed under GPL-2 and should be mentioned in your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new

[DRE-maint] ruby-bootstrap-switch-rails_3.3.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please mention bootstrap-switch-rails-3.3.3/vendor/assets/javascripts/* in your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

[DRE-maint] ruby-sys-filesystem_1.1.7-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, the software is licensed under Artistic 2.0, but in your debian/copyright you refer to the Artistic 1.0 license in /usr/share/common-licenses. I am afraid that does not match, so please add the Artistic 2 license text to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to r

[DRE-maint] vagrant-sshfs_1.2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Hans, can you please explain why you say in your debian/copyright that this software is licensed under GPL-2+? All I found in the source tarball is a reference to GPL-2 only!? Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were reje

[DRE-maint] ruby-prof_0.15.9+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

as requested by mail ... === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintaine

[DRE-maint] ruby-prof_0.15.9+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please mention the files licensed under the Open Font License in your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. _

[DRE-maint] tdiary-style-gfm_0.4.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

same as other version === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainer

[DRE-maint] tdiary-style-gfm_0.4.0-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, according to tdiary-style-gfm-0.4.0/tdiary-style-gfm.gemspec the license is MIT!? Anyway, the GPL-3+ in your debian/copyright should be better only GPL-3. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you uplo

[DRE-maint] schleuder-cli_0.0.1~beta13-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Georg, as the license of this software is only GPL-3, the term "or (at your option) any later version." should not be present in the corresponding license block of your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your f

[DRE-maint] rubocop_0.46.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

same as other version ... === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-mainta

[DRE-maint] rubocop_0.47.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Miguel, according to README.md: rubocop-0.47.0/README.md:The logo is licensed under a rubocop-0.47.0/README.md:[Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en_GB). rubocop-0.47.0/README.md:Copyright (c) 2012-2017 B

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-string-direction_1.2.0-1_amd64.changes

Hi, I marked your package for accept, but: License: GPL-3 and the term or (at your option) any later version. in the license text do not really match. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists

[DRE-maint] ruby-secure-headers_3.5.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please add all copyright holders to your debian/copyright, Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ru

[DRE-maint] ruby-openssl_2.0.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

requested by maintainer .. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maint

[DRE-maint] ruby-asciidoctor-plantuml_0.0.7-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, the copyright holder does not seem to match the Author. Is this intentionally? Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. _

[DRE-maint] ruby-gettext-i18n-rails-js_1.3.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please take care of: E: ruby-gettext-i18n-rails-js source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/gettext/jed.js line length is 2360 characters (>512) and mention all licenses/copyright information of vendor/assets/javascripts/gettext/jed.js in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorste

[DRE-maint] ruby-totoridipjp_0.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

as requested by email === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@

[DRE-maint] ruby-paranoia_2.1.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please use the license text from the LICENSE file in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___

[DRE-maint] ruby-email-reply-parser_0.5.8-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please check with upstream whether the copyright holder from the LICENSE file or from metadata.yml is the correct one. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concern

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-state-machines-activerecord_0.3.0-1_amd64.changes

Hi, I marked your package for accept, but it would be great to add the correct copyright-years to your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.

Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-email-reply-parser_0.5.8-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, Pirate Praveen wrote: Upstream has responded "They're both correct." Great, thanks alot for taking care of this. Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http:/

[DRE-maint] diff for passenger in Squeeze

Hi everybody, can someone please have a look at the diff for passenger=2.2.11debian-2 in Squeeze that should solve CVE-2015-7519[1] and nod? Thanks! Thorsten [1] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-7519 diff -Nru passenger-2.2.11debian/ext/apache2/Hooks.cpp passenger-2.

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-thinking-sphinx_3.1.4-2_amd64.changes

Hi Andrew, your package depends on 'builder'. Can you please tell me where I can find this? Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mail

[DRE-maint] ruby-codemirror-rails_5.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andrew, please take care of these lintian errors: E: ruby-codemirror-rails source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/codemirror/modes/clojure.js E: ruby-codemirror-rails source: source-is-missing vendor/assets/javascripts/codemirror/modes/cypher.js E: ruby-codemirror-rails sourc

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-minitar_0.5.4-1_amd64.changes

Hi Markus, I marked the package for accept, but according to README the software is dual licensed, so please mention the Ruby-license in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainer

[DRE-maint] ruby-reek_3.8.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andrew, please mention the license of reek-3.8.2/spec/samples/redcloth.rb in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___

[DRE-maint] ruby-sentry-raven_0.15.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, raven-ruby-0.15.3/lib/raven/okjson.rb is not licensed under Apache-2 Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-rbpdf_1.19.0-1_amd64.changes

Hi Antonio, I marked the package for accept, but please add rbpdf-1.19.0/rbpdf-font/lib/fonts/ttf2ufm/* to the LGPL license block in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@

[DRE-maint] Bug#812103: CVE-2015-7519

Hi Linus, as others might be interested in the answer as well, I also send it to debian-lts@. On irc you wrote: 15:05 < Nirkus> have some old redmine running on squeeze-lts (yeah..) and since the update yesterday the following redmine code bails out with "private method `split' called for ni

[DRE-maint] ruby-foreigner_1.7.4-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

as requested on irc === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@li

[DRE-maint] ruby-premailer_1.8.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, some files premailer-1.8.6/test/files/*.css: just contain a copyright but no license information: * Copyright (c) 2009 Dialect Communications Group (dialect.ca) Please check with upstream whether the BSD-3 license is also valid for them. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respon

[DRE-maint] tdiary-theme_4.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. According to the file headers some files are licensed under Apache-2. Please mention them in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you

[DRE-maint] ruby-re2_0.5.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject you package. The text in LICENSE.TXT does not correspond with the text in debian/copyright. Please adjust debian/copyright accordingly. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were r

[DRE-maint] ruby-http_0.5.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the license of ruby-http-0.5.0\lib\http\uri_backport.rb to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new fi

[DRE-maint] ruby-em-mongo_0.5.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. According to debian/copyright the license is Expat. According to some file headers is Apache-2.0. Can you please clarify the license status? Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand w

[DRE-maint] ruby-sinon-rails_1.4.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. The license information of: ruby-sinon-rails-1.4.2.1\vendor\assets\javascripts\sinon.js is missing in debian/coypright. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected

[DRE-maint] ruby-entypo-rails_2.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. In debian/copyright you mention CC BY 3.0 and SIL Open Font License but you did not add the license text itself. All *.svg files contain a line: Copyright (C) 2012 by original authors @ fontello.com Can you please explain why thi

[DRE-maint] ruby-minitest-stub-const_0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Your debian/copyright needs some rework. In addition can you please tell me why this package is needed in Debian. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected

[DRE-maint] ruby-source-map_3.0.1+git.20120229.bda06a3f-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing BSD license of ruby-source_map-master\lib\source_map\vlq.rb to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or i

[DRE-maint] Bug#747405: missing license in debian/copyright

Package: ruby-gnome2 Version: 2.2.0-1 Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, please add the missing license of: goocanvas/sample/demo-fifteen.rb goocanvas/sample/demo-primitives.rb goocanvas/sample/demo.r

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-client-side-validations_3.2.6+gh-1_amd64.changes

Hi Praveen, I marked your package for accept but please add the dual license of client_side_validations-3.2.6\test\javascript\public\vendor\jquery.metadata.js client_side_validations-3.2.6\test\javascript\public\vendor\qunit.js to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten __

[DRE-maint] ruby-nested-form_0.3.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing license of nested-form-0.3.2\spec\dummy\app\assets\javascripts\jquery.js to debian/copyright. Are you sure that you want to distribute nested-form-0.3.2\spec\dummy\tmp\cache\* in the source tarball? Tho

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-semverse_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes

Dear Maintainer, can you please explain why LICENSE.txt says the license is Expat but metadata.yml and semverse.gemspec tell something about Apache 2. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.a

[DRE-maint] ruby-kramdown-rfc2629_1.0.13-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention the licenses of lib/kramdown-rfc2629.rb in debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which addr

[DRE-maint] ruby-semverse_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

old version with wrong license information === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-rub

[DRE-maint] ruby-celluloid-io_0.15.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing license of lib/celluloid/io/stream.rb to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files wh

Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-entypo-rails_2.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Pirate Praveen wrote: In debian/copyright you mention CC BY 3.0 and SIL Open Font License but you did not add the license text itself. I have added a link to OFL license, I hope that is enough (source itself doesn't contain the full text). No, I am afraid this is not en

[DRE-maint] ruby-entypo-rails_2.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

explained in other email === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintaine

[DRE-maint] ruby-font-awesome-rails_4.0.3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, please add the complete text of OFL to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

[DRE-maint] ruby-sidekiq_3.2.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. There are several minified files without source in directory web (e.g. bootstrap.css). Further the licenses of these minified files are not mentioned in debian/copyright. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email

[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-admin_0.6.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, please update your debian/copyright. I found files under an Apache license and "Dual licensed under the MIT and GPL licenses", which are not mentioned. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-request-store_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes

Dear Maintainer, this is a rather small package. The size of the Expat license information is greater than the code size. Wouldn't it be possible to group this stuff with something else? Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-r

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding rhc_1.30.2-1_amd64.changes

Dear Maintainer, I marked your package for accept, but please mention all copyright holders in your debian/coypright, for example James Miller from lib/rhc/vendor/sshkey.rb. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-ex

[DRE-maint] ruby-ftw_0.0.39-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

as requested by sponsor === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainer

[DRE-maint] ruby-sidekiq_3.2.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package again. The files ./web/assets/javascripts/application.js ./web/assets/javascripts/dashboard.js are still only available in the minified version, which is not the preferred form for modification. Thorsten === Please feel free t

[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-admin_0.6.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing licenses of files in spec/* to your debian/copyright. I found at least SIL OFL 1.1, Apache, Expat or GPL in it. Or maybe you can just remove the directory from the source tarball. Thanks! Thorsten === Please

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-uuid_2.3.7-1_amd64.changes

Hi, all files *.rb say in their header: License:: MIT and/or Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike which looks rather strange. Can you please ask upstream what is meant by this "and or or"? Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers maili

[DRE-maint] ruby-crass_0.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortumnately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing licenses of: test/support/serialization/bootstrap.css test/support/serialization/pure.css to your debian/copyright. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why

[DRE-maint] ruby-patron_0.4.18-2_i386.changes REJECTED

as requested by zeha === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@l

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-d3-rails_3.4.13+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

Dear Maintainer, this package seems to be rather empty. Would it be possible to add the contents to another package? Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debi

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding origami_1.2.7-1_amd64.changes

Dear Maintainer, I marked your package for accept, but you should name your license blocks LGPL-3+ and GPL-3+ and maybe rework the wording of the blocks a bit ... Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintai

Re: [DRE-maint] Comments regarding origami_1.2.7-1_amd64.changes

Hi Antonio On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Antonio Terceiro wrote: Well, I was not super happy with the wordingm, but those _are_ the licensing statements that exist in the upstream sources. Do you have any suggestion on how the text could be improved? I am good at detecting but not at rewording. Maybe

  1   2   >