On 13/11/14 03:29, Russ Allbery wrote:
Tim Wootton t...@tee-jay.demon.co.uk writes:
or just build without the dependency in the 1st place like it used to
be. After all it's not like it adds anything that's essential.
No, including the dependency is the right approach and is consistent with
On Mi, 12 nov 14, 18:43:49, John Holland wrote:
BTW I don't want to sound like an anti-systemd zealot but I did also
try to replace systemd with sysinitv on this VM to see if that would
make a difference. When I tried to remove the systemd-named packages
and their dependencies it basically
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 05:53:14AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Nov 01, Bill Allombert ballo...@debian.org wrote:
Is there alternative documents describing the interfaces for packages to
interoperate with systemd, and transition documents available for packagers
and
users that need to
