Maintainer scripts (postinst, postrm, etc) in packages are to always use
invoke-rc.d, exceptions are almost always a package bug. Even when using
systemd. The naming is unfortunate, yes.
But users and admins are to use service, and never invoke-rc.d.
And the systemd glue in invoke-rc.d is curr
[Martin Pitt]
> "service", not invoke-rc.d, but I do agree that it would be better to
> completely drop that magic. This would be a nice way to gradually teach people
> about the init system neutral APIs, and also find/fix places which hardcode
> calling /etc/init.d/.
Will service respect policy-r
On 26 December 2016 at 06:18, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Am 25.12.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Felipe Sateler:
> > PR 4978 was closed in favor of 4972. However, it has not been merged
> > yet. The patch is small so at least I don't have a problem with
> > backporting. However, we prefer patches to be merge
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.o
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #849316 (http://bugs.debian.org/849316)
# Bug title: machinctl: fails to list anything
On 12/29/2016 01:59 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Martin Pitt]
>> "service", not invoke-rc.d, but I do agree that it would be better to
>> completely drop that magic. This would be a nice way to gradually teach
>> people
>> about the init system neutral APIs, and also find/fix places which har
Hi Andreas,
Sorry for not replying earlier, but I wanted to mull this over some
before answering.
On 12/27/2016 10:49 AM, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 01:34:41PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> Hi there,
>> (Cc'd a lot of people, so that hopefully everybody relevant
>> i
Hello Andreas, all,
Andreas Henriksson [2016-12-27 10:49 +0100]:
> At the same time for Buster it might be time to let go of this. Just
> leave init-d-script broken in this regard (and hopefully find someone
> willing to maintain it and handle its other issues). But in that case
> I also think the
Package: systemd
Version: 232-8
When running a SELinux enabled system /sys/devices/system/cpu/online
is mislabeled after boot:
root@test1:/root/selinux/policy# restorecon -vv -R -F -n /sys
Would relabel /sys/devices/system/cpu/online from
system_u:object_r:sysfs_t:s0 to system_u:object_r:cpu_onli