On Mon 2017-02-06 17:18:59 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I've masked the user service dirmngr.socket on one user. Out of
> curiosity i tried to see what it looked like, and i got some crazy
> spew.
>
> then i tried unmasking and re-masking and it to try to capture the
> problem, and it didn'
Package: systemd
Version: 232-15
Severity: normal
I've masked the user service dirmngr.socket on one user. Out of
curiosity i tried to see what it looked like, and i got some crazy
spew.
then i tried unmasking and re-masking and it to try to capture the
problem, and it didn't come back.
Then i
Hi,
On 06/02/17 17:36, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 06.02.2017 um 18:07 schrieb James Cowgill:
>> Source: systemd
>> Version: 232-15
>> Severity: important
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> While testing #852811 I discovered that systemd does not build within an
>> overlayfs schroot (which all my mips chroots are setu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.o
Am 06.02.2017 um 18:07 schrieb James Cowgill:
> Source: systemd
> Version: 232-15
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> While testing #852811 I discovered that systemd does not build within an
> overlayfs schroot (which all my mips chroots are setup as). Specifically
> the "test-copy" test fails with
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #758279 (http://bugs.debian.org/758279)
# Bug title: systemd: Manpage systemd-sleep st
Source: systemd
Version: 232-15
Severity: important
Hi,
While testing #852811 I discovered that systemd does not build within an
overlayfs schroot (which all my mips chroots are setup as). Specifically
the "test-copy" test fails with:
> FAIL: test-copy
> ===
>
> test_copy_file
> tes
Hi,
On 06/02/17 13:52, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 06.02.2017 um 11:21 schrieb James Cowgill:
>> On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 12:16:41 + James Cowgill wrote:
>>> Control: retitle -1 udev: Doesn't start after upgrade mipsel, powerpc
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> FWIW, and as predicted by comments on the upstream bu
Source: systemd
Version: 232-15
Severity: normal
In test-execute.c the test_exec_privatenetwork test is not run if
the ip binary is not found:
src/test/test-execute.c:r = find_binary("ip", NULL);
src/test/test-execute.c-if (r < 0) {
src/test/test-execute.c-log_erro
Source: systemd
Version: 232-15
Severity: normal
In test/test-execute.c the test_exec_capabilityboundingset is skipped if
capsh is not found:
test/test-execute.c:/* We use capsh to test if the capabilities are
test/test-execute.c:r = find_binary("capsh", NULL);
test/test-execute.c
Source: systemd
Version: 232-15
Severity: normal
Several of the upstream tests require root privileges as otherwise they
do nothing:
if (geteuid() != 0)
return;
It seems we missed issues because of that like the recent RAS/seccomp
incident has shown [1].
E.g. test-seccomp was rightfully f
Package: systemd
Version: 232-15
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Installed Debian on the acer chromebook R13 (mediatek MT8173 SOC,
board called elm (oak)) armv8 with the kernel source from chromeos
site and built myself for that devi
Am 06.02.2017 um 11:21 schrieb James Cowgill:
> On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 12:16:41 + James Cowgill wrote:
>> Control: retitle -1 udev: Doesn't start after upgrade mipsel, powerpc
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> FWIW, and as predicted by comments on the upstream bugreport, this also
>> fails on at least mipsel. I hav
On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 12:16:41 + James Cowgill wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 udev: Doesn't start after upgrade mipsel, powerpc
>
> Hi,
>
> FWIW, and as predicted by comments on the upstream bugreport, this also
> fails on at least mipsel. I haven't checked the other mips arches yet.
Yes it also
Issue is still there on most recent (at the moment) Debian Sid /
Cinnamon. It seems to be completly random, Cinnamon freezes and I need
to reboot computer from console. After 1-2 hours or even after 5 hours
after login to Cinnamon.
Isn't there any fix yet? This is quite annoying.
15 matches
Mail list logo